LATEST NEWS / TOP STORIES

Charlie Kirk: ‘Did Joe Biden have a serious medical event in Vegas that has been covered up?’

Got a weird lead on a story that people should look into. I got a call from a source close to Las Vegas Metro. The official story was that Joe Biden’s trip was cut short last week due to COVID. However, according to this source, US Secret Service informed LV Metro that there was an emergency situation involving Joe Biden and to close necessary streets so that POTUS could be transported immediately to University Medical, which they began to do in earnest. Then, mysteriously, there was a stand down order and the USSS informed local Vegas PD that they were going to “medivac” POTUS to Johns Hopkins, which they presumed meant fly him back east ASAP. Apparently the rumor mill in the police department was that Joe Biden was dying or possibly already dead.

I didn’t think too much about this lead, seemed too wild to be true, but given that Joe Biden has been out of public sight for days and dropped out of the race via an 𝕏 post, and his brother James indicated health was a factor, I’m beginning to grow more curious if COVID or something else has been more serious than reported. If anyone with LV Metro has information, please email Freedom@CharlieKirk.com. I want to hear if there is more to the official story than what they’re telling us

UPDATE: I’ve received multiple emails like this one confirming many elements of the story. Many have confirmed that a call went out to block streets to get Biden to University Medical trauma center ASAP, and then the plan abruptly changed and they got him out on AF1 very quickly. I have not confirmed the IDs of these people, but there are an overwhelming number of stories corroborating essentially the same account that I felt comfortable sharing. I have people diving deeper into this now.

People have sent me a post from Emily Goodin, senior White House correspondent for the DailyMail from July 17th. She documented that the flight time from Vegas to Dover was 3hrs 48 mins—extremely fast—and that AF1 flew so fast the “plane shook.” This seems to confirm reports of how urgently AF1 took off out of Vegas. The questions now are:

Did Joe Biden have a serious medical event in Vegas that has been covered up?

Did that medical event contribute to his decision to pull out of the race?

How precarious is Joe Biden’s current health condition?

Boxer Ryan Garcia: “Jesus Is The Greatest.’

Boxing sensation Ryan Garcia, 25, shocked the world Saturday in a stunning upset against previously undefeated World Boxing Council junior welterweight world champion Devin Haney, and much of his pre- and post-fight media centered on the protection of children against trafficking and violence.

PBD: Ryan Garcia Unfiltered

Ryan Garcia sat down with Patrick Bet-David to talk about his most recent win against Devin Haney, feud with Logan Paul, alleged encounter with Bohemian Grove, and a possible rematch with Gervonta Davis. He also mentioned a positive move into politics to help the children caught up in the conflict in the middle east.

Garcia made headlines by revealing his upcoming meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, where they plan to explore avenues for aiding the children affected by the conflict in Gaza.

Ryan Garcia On X

“I have a meeting with Bibi Netanyahu within two weeks…wants to show me Gaza, wants to show me around. He wants to talk to me, and I told him, like, I just want to propose how can we help children on both sides.”

Boxer Ryan Garcia announces Netanyahu meeting and trip to help children in Gaza. Boxing megastar Ryan Garcia announced he will soon meet with Israeli Prime Benjamin Netanyahu and discuss ways to help children in war-ravaged Gaza.

The boxer echoed this sentiment as the motivation to go to a war-weary Gaza. “I’m all about supporting children,” he said. “I’m not part of Hamas. I love Israel. Israel loves me. I love people from Gaza and Palestine. “You know, I know everybody gets so, ‘Oh, you say Palestine then you can’t say Israel!'” Garcia continued. “Bro, at the end of the day, I’m here to save the kids. However I could do that, I’m going to do it, you know, on both sides.

“I Barely Tried” – Ryan Garcia Reflects on his Fight Against Devin Haney

” In March, Garcia posted to X that he would donate upwards of $20 million to Gaza following his fight with Haney, and he told Bet-David the details regarding a donation are still being worked out. “You can hate on me all you want,” Garcia said.

“If I’m going to send $20 million to Gaza, I’m gonna send $20 million to Israel if it helps out kids. “It all needs to be addressed,” he continued. “So, that’s my whole stance on it. Again, I’m a Christian, of course I’m going to love Israel and the Holy Land, but, Palestine people, I have a heart for them.

Jesus had a heart for the Gentiles. … I love everybody, and I’ll leave it at that.”

THREE KNOCKDOWNS | Devin Haney vs. Ryan Garcia Fight Highlights

Elon Musk Calls For A Renewed Focus On Law And Order: “Time To Make Crime Illegal Again”

In a recent statement on X that has sparked widespread discussion, Elon Musk has weighed in on the issue of crime, advocating for a return to stricter enforcement measures. Musk’s blunt declaration, “Time to make crime illegal again,” encapsulates his belief in the importance of law and order in society.

Steve Scalise: Our Union is Struggling Under Biden’s Far-Left Agenda

Under the Biden administration, as the United States contends with a multitude of urgent domestic challenges, a critical question emerges: where do our priorities truly lie? With a border reportedly inundated by over 22+ million immigrants, a harrowing opioid crisis claiming tens of thousands of American lives each year, and a host of economic difficulties such as record inflation, unattainable housing, escalating violent crime rates, and soaring grocery prices, the nation stands at a pivotal juncture.

Democrats and the media are reportedly using unreliable data to reference crime statistics.

Musk’s remark comes at a time when concerns about crime rates have been on the rise. From violent offenses to property crimes, communities across the country are grappling with the impacts of criminal activity on safety, security, and quality of life.

The call to “make crime illegal again” underscores Musk’s belief in the necessity of robust law enforcement and deterrents to prevent criminal behavior. For Musk, the rule of law is fundamental to the functioning of society, providing the framework within which individuals can thrive and communities can prosper.

Debate Ignites As Congress Members Wave Ukrainian Flags Post $95 Billion Aid Package—Should American Flags Fly Instead?

“Pretty sure the last time we saw American flags being waved in the halls of Congress was And they threw those people in prison”

In the aftermath of Congress passing a monumental $95 billion aid package to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan, a stirring debate has erupted over the symbolism displayed by some members of Congress. As the news broke of the significant financial support allocated to these nations emerged, images flooded social media and news outlets, capturing Congress members waving Ukrainian flags in a show of solidarity. However, amidst this display, questions have arisen regarding whether American flags should have taken precedence in this moment of national decision-making

“The Ukranian-Russian border is our border!” — Rep. Gerald Connolly, D-Virginia

“Our border is being invaded by 8+ million illegal aliens

Fentanyl is killing tens of thousands of Americans

We have record inflation, unaffordable housing, rising violent crime, and grocery bills that cost double

And what does Congress do?

Wave Ukrainian flags”

Dc_Draino

Under the Biden administration, as the United States grapples with a myriad of pressing domestic challenges, a poignant question arises: where do our priorities lie? With a border invaded by over 22+ million immigrants, a devastating opioid crisis claiming tens of thousands of American lives annually, and a slew of economic woes including record inflation, unaffordable housing, rising violent crime rates, and skyrocketing grocery bills, the nation finds itself at a crossroads.

In the face of such formidable challenges, the actions of Congress have come under scrutiny. While these critical domestic issues continue to plague communities across the country, the recent sight of congressional members waving Ukrainian flags following the passage of a substantial $95 Billion aid package to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan has sparked controversy and raised questions about the allocation of attention and resources.

“Put those damn flags away. It is a disgrace to display any other flag than the American flag in the House Chamber!” — Rep. Anna Paulina Luna

The juxtaposition is stark: on one hand, the relentless influx of illegal immigration strains resources, exacerbates social tensions, and challenges the integrity of the nation’s borders. With millions of undocumented immigrants residing within the country, concerns about national security, public safety, and the strain on social services loom large. The urgency to address these issues and implement effective immigration policies that balance compassion with enforcement has never been more acute.

Meanwhile, the opioid epidemic continues to ravage communities, claiming lives at an alarming rate. Fentanyl, a potent synthetic opioid, has emerged as a leading cause of overdose deaths, infiltrating neighborhoods and devastating families across the nation. Tens of thousands of lives are lost each year to this lethal drug, underscoring the need for comprehensive strategies to combat drug trafficking, expand access to treatment and recovery services, and address the root causes of addiction.

‘To all of our voters demoralized by what the House did today: keep fighting. It won’t be easy, but we’re going to save this country.’ – J.D.Vance

Furthermore, the economic challenges facing Americans are undeniable. Record levels of inflation erode purchasing power and strain household budgets, making essentials such as housing and groceries increasingly unaffordable for many families. Rising violent crime rates further compound these hardships, undermining public safety and eroding trust in law enforcement.

In light of these pressing concerns, the decision of Congress to prioritize symbolic gestures over substantive action has sparked frustration and disillusionment among many Americans. While demonstrating solidarity with international allies is undoubtedly important, it must not come at the expense of addressing the urgent needs of the American people.

“If you ask DC politicians, Ukraine is the 51st state. Absolutely insane.”

Charlie Kirk

As the nation navigates these turbulent times, it is imperative that elected officials heed the calls for action from their constituents. Meaningful progress on immigration reform, combating the opioid crisis, addressing economic inequality, and ensuring public safety requires a steadfast commitment to putting the interests of the American people first.

In the end, the true measure of leadership lies not in grand gestures or symbolic displays, but in tangible results that improve the lives of all Americans. As the nation confronts its challenges with resilience and determination, it is imperative that Congress rises to the occasion and prioritizes the pressing needs of the nation above all else.

Congress Members Wave Ukrainian Flags After A $95 Billion Aid Package To Ukraine, Israel And Taiwan Is Passed

“Our border is being invaded by 8+ million illegal aliens

Fentanyl is killing tens of thousands of Americans

We have record inflation, unaffordable housing, rising violent crime, and grocery bills that cost double

And what does Congress do?

Wave Ukrainian flags”

Dc_Draino

As the United States grapples with a myriad of pressing domestic challenges, a poignant question arises: where do our priorities lie? With a border invaded by over 22+ million immigrants, a devastating opioid crisis claiming tens of thousands of American lives annually, and a slew of economic woes including record inflation, unaffordable housing, rising violent crime rates, and skyrocketing grocery bills, the nation finds itself at a crossroads.

In the face of such formidable challenges, the actions of Congress have come under scrutiny. While these critical domestic issues continue to plague communities across the country, the recent sight of congressional members waving Ukrainian flags following the passage of a substantial $95 Billion aid package to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan has sparked controversy and raised questions about the allocation of attention and resources.

The juxtaposition is stark: on one hand, the relentless influx of illegal immigration strains resources, exacerbates social tensions, and challenges the integrity of the nation’s borders. With millions of undocumented immigrants residing within the country, concerns about national security, public safety, and the strain on social services loom large. The urgency to address these issues and implement effective immigration policies that balance compassion with enforcement has never been more acute.

“If you ask DC politicians, Ukraine is the 51st state. Absolutely insane.” — Charlie Kirk

“The Ukranian-Russian border is our border!” — Rep. Gerald Connolly, D-Virginia

Meanwhile, the opioid epidemic continues to ravage communities, claiming lives at an alarming rate. Fentanyl, a potent synthetic opioid, has emerged as a leading cause of overdose deaths, infiltrating neighborhoods and devastating families across the nation. Tens of thousands of lives are lost each year to this lethal drug, underscoring the need for comprehensive strategies to combat drug trafficking, expand access to treatment and recovery services, and address the root causes of addiction.

Furthermore, the economic challenges facing Americans are undeniable. Record levels of inflation erode purchasing power and strain household budgets, making essentials such as housing and groceries increasingly unaffordable for many families. Rising violent crime rates further compound these hardships, undermining public safety and eroding trust in law enforcement.

“Put those damn flags away. It is a disgrace to display any other flag than the American flag in the House Chamber!” — Rep. Anna Paulina Luna

In light of these pressing concerns, the decision of Congress to prioritize symbolic gestures over substantive action has sparked frustration and disillusionment among many Americans. While demonstrating solidarity with international allies is undoubtedly important, it must not come at the expense of addressing the urgent needs of the American people.

‘To all of our voters demoralized by what the House did today: keep fighting. It won’t be easy, but we’re going to save this country.’ – J.D.Vance

As the nation navigates these turbulent times, it is imperative that elected officials heed the calls for action from their constituents. Meaningful progress on immigration reform, combating the opioid crisis, addressing economic inequality, and ensuring public safety requires a steadfast commitment to putting the interests of the American people first.

In the end, the true measure of leadership lies not in grand gestures or symbolic displays, but in tangible results that improve the lives of all Americans. As the nation confronts its challenges with resilience and determination, it is imperative that Congress rises to the occasion and prioritizes the pressing needs of the nation above all else.

ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith Calls Out Democrats, Again Over Trump Hush Money Trial: ‘I’m Utterly DISGUSTED With What I’m Seeing. They’ve Clearly POLITICIZED This’

In recent remarks, Stephen A. Smith didn’t hold back his criticism of the ongoing hush money trial involving former President Trump, expressing his desire to witness Trump’s defeat through lawful means. This trial marks a historic moment as Trump becomes the first former U.S. president to stand trial in a criminal case, with proceedings commencing in Manhattan this week.

At the heart of the case lies allegations that Trump unlawfully manipulated business records while reimbursing his former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, for payments made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels to conceal an alleged affair prior to the 2016 presidential election. Smith contended that the Democrats’ insistence on commencing Trump’s trial before the election, despite his efforts to postpone it, underscores their fears regarding Biden’s ability to beat Trump in the polls.

“That appears to be their strategy, but I’m going to tell you, it’s not working. It’s not working at all,” Smith told Fox News’s Sean Hannity on Thursday. “And to be quite honest, I don’t mind the fact that it’s not working because I might not be a supporter of Donald Trump, but I want him to lose the right way.”

“Primarily I have voted Democrat throughout my life, but I’m utterly disgusted with what I’m seeing…They’ve clearly politicized this thing with Donald Trump because they can’t come up with a strategy to offset the momentum he’s clearly gained.”

Stephen A. Smith

“I want him to lose because you have better ideas and you make your case to the American people better than he does. That’s why I want him to lose,” he continued, citing President Biden. “I don’t want him to lose the way they’re trying to make him lose.”

Professional Remote Control Robot Hybrid Lawn Mower

Click Here: Remote Controlled Robot Hybrid Lawn Mower – Farm, Lawn, Garden and Home Orchard: Yamaha Engine

Miracle At Six Months: A Young Woman Expresses Gratitude To Dr. Ben Carson For Saving Her Life

Wow! This is powerful. During Q+A at our Texas A&M Turning Point USA event tonight, a young woman took the mic to thank Dr. Carson for saving her life when she was just six months old. The condition is called craniosynostosis and Dr. Carson operated on her at John’s Hopkins in November 1995. Her name is Sara Bowker. No one knew she was coming or planned to thank Dr. Carson publicly.

Remarkable.

Charlie Kirk
Dr. Ben Carson Hugs Sara Bowker At TPUSA

Dr. Ben Carson: A Remarkable Journey of Perseverance and Achievement

In the annals of American history, the name Dr. Ben Carson stands as a testament to the power of determination, intellect, and resilience. His life story reads like a modern-day odyssey, marked by remarkable achievements and unwavering dedication to excellence.

Born in Detroit, Michigan, on September 18, 1951, Benjamin Solomon Carson Sr. grew up in challenging circumstances. Raised by a single mother in poverty, Carson faced numerous obstacles from an early age. Despite these adversities, he exhibited an extraordinary intellect and an insatiable thirst for knowledge.

Carson’s academic prowess began to shine through during his school years. He excelled in his studies, demonstrating a remarkable aptitude for science and mathematics. However, his journey was not without its hurdles. Struggling with poor grades initially, Carson faced ridicule and doubt from his peers and teachers. Yet, undeterred by these setbacks, he resolved to prove his detractors wrong through sheer determination and hard work.

Multi-Functional, Movable Folding Drop Leaf Dining Table with Storage, Drawers And Cushion Chairs – Extendable Kitchen Console

Portable Folding Drop Leaf Dining Table on Wheels with Storage, Drawers And Cushion Chairs

With unwavering determination, Carson pursued his dream of becoming a physician. He attended Yale University, where he earned a degree in psychology, and later enrolled at the University of Michigan Medical School. Despite facing financial challenges, Carson remained focused on his goal, ultimately graduating with honors in 1977.

Ben Carson – Gifted Hands Audiobook

In the audiobook Gifted Hands, the inspiring story of Ben Carson, M.D. takes readers into the life of an inner-city youngster who rose above his circumstances to become director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins University Hospital.

Carson’s career as a neurosurgeon would soon catapult him to national prominence. Renowned for his groundbreaking surgical techniques and innovative approaches to complex medical cases, he quickly emerged as a leading figure in the field of neurosurgery. In 1987, Carson made medical history by successfully separating conjoined twins, a feat that garnered worldwide acclaim and solidified his reputation as a pioneering surgeon.

Beyond his achievements in medicine, Carson has also made significant contributions to education and public service. In 2008, he authored the best-selling memoir “Gifted Hands,” which chronicles his life story and serves as an inspiration to countless individuals facing adversity. Subsequently, Carson transitioned into politics, serving as the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under the Trump administration from 2017 to 2021.

Throughout his remarkable journey, Dr. Ben Carson has remained a beacon of hope and inspiration for millions around the world. His story serves as a powerful reminder that with perseverance, determination, and unwavering faith in oneself, even the loftiest dreams can be achieved. As he continues to inspire future generations, Dr. Carson’s legacy will endure as a testament to the boundless potential of the human spirit.

Lovestruck Fleece Blanket – Fluffy Soft Texture – Warm And Cozy – Couch, Sofa, Bedroom Throw

Lovestruck Fleece Blanket – Fluffy Soft Texture – Warm And Cozy – Home Living Room, Bedroom Decor Throw

Newly Naturalized US Citizen Dismissed From Trump Jury Shares Initial Impression Of Trump’s Skin Color:

‘You know he looked less orange, definitely like more yellowish, like yellow.’ 🤡🌏

In a recent interview on April 16th, Trump legal spokesperson Alina Habba joined ‘Fox & Friends First’ to discuss the latest developments in the former president’s hush money trial in New York City.

Trump attorney warns there is ‘no chance’ he gets a fair trial

Interviewer: Do you think Donald J. Trump will be able to get a fair trial?

Alina Habba: No chance. There is no chance of a fair trial here. Remember, just because it’s a jury doesn’t mean that the judge can’t sway them to go one way or another or make things difficult so that jury selection is impossible. That’s what happened yesterday. They spent the first few hours doing things that probably should have been done before a jury was waiting. That discourages jurors to want to sit on a panel. And then they come in and they are told that they can’t get off from Passover if they observe it. That you will have no break other than Wednesday in the middle of the week. That messes up everybody’s schedules. And people don’t want to sit for that. That’s why we saw half of the jurors say they could not be impartial and want to walk.

Interviewer: What’s your reaction, Alina, to the judge saying we understand that former President Trump wants to go to the Supreme Court for his other case. It’s not going to happen. Might not be able to take off one day to see his son graduate high school. Is this standard for judges to turn requests like that down or do they make those sorts of accommodations, usually?

Click Here: Remote Controlled Hybrid Pro Lawn Mower

Professional Remote Control Robot Hybrid Lawn Mower – Farm, Lawn, Garden and Home Orchard: Yamaha Engine

Alina Habba: No. Accommodations are always made by judges. That’s why you go over the schedule. If there wasn’t such a rigid schedule you wouldn’t be doing that in practice. Did you go over it. You look at holidays and things of that nature. Remember, something about this, Carley. This case has been investigated for 8 years. It wasn’t brought by Cy Vance and now D.A. Bragg is bringing this case after the President had announced that he was running for office again. There’s no coincidences here. So now he wants to rush it because November 2024 is an election and is he probably hoping he has got this in the bag. Even though it’s on completely discredited witnesses, that we know have perjured themselves. It’s ridiculous. So, yeah, that’s an accommodation that would normally be made. It’s not just a discourtesy to the President. It’s to all the people in there, the jurors. The attorneys that observe holidays, never mind Barron’s high school graduation. There is absolutely no rush after 8 years other than the fact that November 2024 is election day.

Interviewer: And to your point on the quote, unquote rush job that Merchan is doing he said well, I may grant the President allowance to go see his son graduate if we are moving along. That’s a warning shot. Don’t slow this thing up, Donald Trump’s attorney and ie don’t slow it up doing your job, attorneys, which is to advocate for the best interest of your client. Before we let you know, we know the media is going to have a lot of influence in this case if they haven’t done so already. Washington releasing too much personal information on a potential juror with lives, works, multiple details about his family. Should that reporter get reprimanded by this court for literally jeopardizing the anonymous juror rule so important to the juries prudence in our country?

Alina Habba: Yeah. I think it is important. I think being a part of a jury I think being a part of a jury is a critical part of our service to our country. Being able to do so impartiality is incredibly critical, and right now what we’ve seen between the judge and these journalists is that your jepordizing the safety of individuals and you really shouldn’t do that. Generally speaking it will discourage people from sitting on the panel and they will say they can’t sit even if they could serve. Yeah, so it’s a problem. They should not be able to do it.

Interviewer: This style expected to last until, what, June? The former President is required to be there every day that this trial is in session.

The View’s Resident Legal Genius Sunny Hostin Believes Trump Will Get An Impartial Jury —

As long as it’s filled with people who hate him and a Trump supporter doesn’t “sneak onto the jury.”

🤡🌎

The View Speaking On Trump Trial

US Flag Inspired Design Fleece Blanket – Soft And Cozy Sofa, Couch, Bed Throw – Gift Ideas

US Themed Soft Fleece Blanket

SHOCKING! Trump Trial FIX IS IN! Dismissed Juror Admits Outrageous POLITICAL BIAS!

Viva Frei discusses the ongoing criminal persecution of President Donald Trump in New York.

“Donald Trump is going to get a jury of his peers in New York if his peers consist of MSM consuming brain dead morons who want him lynched”

Viva Frei
Trump Trial: The FIX IS IN

Frei criticizes the judicial process, highlighting perceived biases and conflicts of interest among the judge, jury, and prosecutors. He expresses skepticism about Trump receiving a fair trial due to what they view as a tainted jury pool consisting of individuals with strong anti-Trump sentiments.

Donald Trump is now the first President in American history to be criminally prosecuted in the wonderful corrupt state of New York

Viva frei

Frei cites an interview with a dismissed juror who openly expressed negative opinions about Trump, suggesting that such biases undermine the fairness of the trial.

Additionally, the he criticizes Trump’s treatment by the media and accuses the judicial system in New York of being corrupt and politically motivated. Overall, Viva Frei condemns a miscarriage of justice and calls for scrutiny of the legal proceedings.

“The most important part is the undeniable political bias of any jury pool in New York. Thank you for playing and assisting in exposing the fact that Trump will never get a fair trial in New York. Regarding Kyle D Cheney, it’s unclear if he has any relation to Liz Cheney, the bipartisan member of the January 6 Kangaroo Court committee that sought to get Trump at all costs.”

Viva Frei

Professional Remote Control Robot Hybrid Lawn Mower

Professional Remote Control Robot Hybrid Lawn Mower

Stephen A. Smith Blasts Democrats As ‘Cowards’ In Lawfare Battles Against Trump: ‘Millions Of People Can See The Extent To Which The Other Side Is Willing To Go Just To Keep Him Out Of Office..’

ESPN’s renowned sports media personality, Stephen A. Smith, didn’t mince words when addressing Democrats’ fervor for prosecuting Donald Trump. In his scathing remarks, Smith asserted that Democrats were merely echoing Trump’s claim that the trials were nothing more than political theatrics.

Smith’s critique comes at a pivotal moment as Trump’s hush money trial commences jury selection, coinciding with his active 2024 presidential campaign. With Trump facing a staggering 88 felony charges spread across four indictments, Smith contends that Democrats should concentrate their efforts on defeating Trump on the campaign trail rather than in court.

Addressing his liberal counterparts, Smith articulated, “To my liberal friends out there, all you’re doing is showing that you’re scared you can’t beat him on the issues and the merits,” Smith said. “That’s why he keeps saying it’s a political campaign against me. That’s why he keeps saying they can’t beat me at the election, at the polls — this is the only way they can do it.” He emphasized Trump’s repeated claim that the legal battles are a strategic move to derail his political ambitions. Smith emphasized that voters are becoming more aware of the extent to which Democrats are willing to go to prevent Trump from returning to the White House, expressing concern over the resulting lack of national unity

“And they’re going to say, ‘Hey, you trumped us up against him again,’ and we’ll have no peace when all you gotta do is figure out a way to beat him on the issues,” Smith said. “But you haven’t been able to do it.”

Smith’s critique echoes a sentiment shared by millions: the need to redirect focus from legal maneuvering to substantive policy debates, where the true battle for the nation’s future lies.

Professional Remote Control Robot Hybrid Lawn Mower

Click Here: Remote Controlled Robot Hybrid Lawn Mower – Farm, Lawn, Garden and Home Orchard: Yamaha Engine

Marjorie Taylor Green: ‘KILL FISA!’

“Mike Johnson set up a private classified briefing room and inside members are being told that people are going to die if we don’t pass FISA!

Now, some Republicans are saying reauthorizing FISA for 2 years rather than 5 will solve our problems.

Stop kicking the can down the road!”

KILL FISA!!

Marjorie Taylor Greene

Could Your Car Be Spying On You? A Woman Shares Her Experience

Your vehicle might be capturing your driving habits, such as speed and abrupt braking, and subsequently transmitting this information to a central database.

Is your car spying on you? This is what one woman said happened to her

Modern vehicles are no longer just modes of transportation; they are evolving into sophisticated machines equipped with microphones, cameras, and sensors that relay signals through complex computer systems. However, the convenience of these features comes with a significant caveat, as highlighted by the Mozilla Foundation in a report from September 2023. According to the report, every interaction with your car generates a minute record of your activities, raising concerns about privacy and data security.

‘Discovered a staggering 603 records’

One woman’s experience sheds light on these worries. Temieka Clay, an Atlanta resident, found herself perplexed when she received a denial letter while applying for new car insurance. The letter directed her to review her LexisNexis report for further insights. To her astonishment, Clay discovered a staggering 603 records from the OnStar computer system in her Chevy Camaro.

General Motors (GM) had been sharing her car’s data with data brokers, unbeknownst to Clay. The data collected included details on acceleration events, high-speed events, and hard braking events. “Your car is essentially turning into a computer and collecting data on you as you drive. And that data is worth something, particularly to your insurance company,” remarked Michael Brooks, the executive director of the Center for Auto Safety.

‘80% increase in her insurance’

Clay’s suspicions were confirmed when she noticed an 80% increase in her insurance premiums, despite having a clean driving record. A proposed class-action lawsuit filed in federal court in Florida echoed Clay’s concerns, alleging that GM’s data-sharing practices unfairly impacted insurance premiums.

Following public outcry and legal action, GM announced the termination of its partnerships with two data brokers. A GM spokesperson emphasized the company’s commitment to customer trust and privacy, stating, “Customer trust is a priority for us, and we are actively evaluating our privacy processes and policies.”

However, the lack of comprehensive laws and regulations regarding data privacy in the automotive industry remains a pressing issue. According to Brooks, there are currently no federal mandates requiring automakers to implement privacy protections for vehicle owners or cybersecurity measures for their vehicles.

Clay’s experience serves as a wake-up call for consumers to exercise their rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act by requesting their LexisNexis consumer disclosure reports. The revelation that vehicles are capable of gathering and transmitting sensitive driving habits data underscores the urgent need for stronger privacy safeguards.

In response to inquiries, LexisNexis Risk Services highlighted the increasing complexity of auto insurance rates, citing factors such as rising claim frequency, escalating repair costs, and risky driving behaviors like speeding. Telematics-based insurance programs, they argue, offer consumers an opportunity to improve their driving habits and mitigate risk.

‘Monitoring over 10 million vehicles’

The issue extends beyond GM, with other major players in the automotive and insurance industries also engaging in data collection practices. In 2022, LexisNexis Risk Services disclosed that they were monitoring over 10 million vehicles and had contracts with five of the ten largest auto insurers.

‘No ONE Is Ready For What’s Coming In Just Days, Biden’s Border DISASTER Exposed’

Biden is warning of a major terror attack on U.S. soil at the same time President Biden suddenly plans to reverse course on the U.S. border. This is a disaster in the making. Senator Rand Paul joins Redacted to talk about the great Covid cover-up.

VIDEO: Redacted News Live

Tucker Carlson: ‘How Does The Government Of Israel Treat Christians? In The West, Christian Leaders Don’t Seem Interested In Knowing The Answer. They Should Be.’

Here’s The View Of A Pastor From Bethlehem.

Live Update: Total Solar MAGA Eclipse 2024

Get ready to mark your calendars and set your alarms for the return of the solar MAGA eclipse, because 2024 is gearing up for a celestial event that will have skygazers across North America buzzing with excitement. As the moon once again eclipses in front of the sun, casting its eerie shadow across the Earth, it’s time to prepare for an awe-inspiring spectacle that promises to be nothing short of epic.

The Eclipse Phenomenon: A Brief Overview

Solar eclipses occur when the moon passes between the Earth and the sun, obscuring the sunlight and casting a shadow on our planet. This phenomenon is a cosmic ballet of perfect alignment, where the sizes and distances of the sun, moon, and Earth align just right for the moon to cover the sun entirely or partially, depending on your location. Crafted by the divine, this celestial marvel unfolds as a flawless orchestration of cosmic forces, seamlessly synchronizing the sizes and distances of the sun, moon, and Earth to allow the moon to either entirely or partially obscure the sun, depending on your vantage point.

50 Cent Posts FJB Eclipse Video On X

The Great American Eclipse: Round Two

In August 2017, millions of people across the United States were treated to the Great American Eclipse, a rare event that captivated the nation from coast to coast. Now, just seven years later, the stage is set for another stunning show in the sky. On April 8, 2024, the moon’s shadow will once again traverse the North American continent, offering spectators a chance to witness this celestial spectacle in all its glory.

WATCH LIVE: 2024 Total Solar Eclipse Sweeps Across America

A Epic Cosmic and Political Encounter

The return of the eclipse in 2024 and the Trump 2024 campaign aren’t just events; they’re moments of unity, wonder, and civic engagement that bring people together. Whether you’re marveling at the celestial spectacle or lending your support to Trump, these experiences offer opportunities for reflection, inspiration, and connection with the world around us.

Video: Solar Eclipse

It’s not just about witnessing the beauty of the cosmos or participating in the democratic process; it’s also about the broader significance of safeguarding our Constitutional rights, freedoms, and liberties. The Trump 2024 campaign represents a chance for citizens to exercise their voice in critical 2024 election, to shape the future of the nation, and to ensure that our values of democracy and liberty endure.

As we come together to experience the eclipse and engage in the political discourse of the campaign, let us also remember the importance of preserving our fundamental principles and resisting any threats to our democratic republic. Let us stand united to bring back our Constitutional rights, freedoms, and liberty and to stop any ideologies that seek to undermine them.

Illustration: Watching Solar Eclipse 2024

So mark your calendars, gather your friends and family, and get ready for an unforgettable year filled with celestial wonders and political significance of Trump 2024.

Order Here: Trump 2024 Caps Here

Michael Shellenberger: “BRAZIL IS ON THE BRINK”

Brazilian Judge Opens Investigation Into Elon Musk After Vowing To Defy Court Order To Block Accounts On X

“I’m reporting to you from Brazil, where a dramatic series of events are underway.

At 5:52 pm Eastern Time, today, April 6, 2024, X corporation, formerly known as Twitter, announced that a Brazilian court had forced it to “block certain popular accounts in Brazil.”

Then, less than one hour later, the owner of X, @ElonMusk announced that X would defy the court’s order, and lift all restrictions.

“As a result,” said Musk, “we will probably lose all revenue in Brazil and have to shut down our office there. But principles matter more than profit.”

At any moment, Brazil’s Supreme Court could shut off all access to X/Twitter for the people of Brazil.
It is not an exaggeration to say that Brazil is on the brink of dictatorship at the hands of a totalitarian Supreme Court Justice named Alexandre de Moraes.

Elon Musk On The Brazilian Constitution

President Lula da Silva is participating in the push toward totalitarianism. Since taking office, Lula has massively increased government funding of the mainstream news media, most of which are encouraging increased censorship.

What Lula and de Moraes are doing is an outrageous violation of Brazil’s constitution and the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights.

Judge Alexandre de Moraes: Orders Investigation Into Elon Musk Over “Obstruction” To Close Popular Brazilian Accounts On X

At this moment, Brazil is not yet a dictatorship. It still has elections and the Brazilian people have other means at their disposal to confront authoritarianism.

But the Federal Supreme Court and the Superior Electoral Court are directly interfere in those elections through censorship.

Three days ago I published the Twitter Files for Brazil. They show that Moraes has violated the Brazilian Constitution. Moraes illegally demanded that Twitter reveal private information about Twitter users who used hashtags he considered inappropriate. He demanded access to Twitter’s internal data, violating the platform’s policy. He censored, on his own initiative and without any respect for due process, posts on Twitter by parliamentarians from the Brazilian Congress. And Moraes tried to turn Twitter’s content moderation policies into a weapon against supporters of then-president Jair Bolsonaro.

I say this as an independent and non-partisan journalist. I’m not a fan of either Bolsonaro or Trump. My political views are very moderate. But I know censorship when I see it.

The Twitter Files also revealed that Google, Facebook, Uber, WhatsApp and Instagram betrayed the people of Brazil. If such evidence is proven, the executives of these companies behaved like cowards: they provided the Brazilian government with personal registration data and telephone numbers without a court order and, therefore, violating the law.
When Twitter refused to provide Brazilian authorities with private user information, including direct messages, the government attempted to sue Twitter’s top Brazilian lawyer.

When I lived in Brazil in 1992, I was very left-wing. At the time, Lula and the PT’s slogans were “Without fear of being happy”.

In recent days, I have spoken to dozens of Brazilians, including professors, journalists and respected lawyers. Everyone tells me they are shocked by what is happening. They told me that they are afraid to speak their mind and that the Lula government is complicit in creating this climate of fear.

Brazil belongs to the Brazilians. It is not my country. As such, there are limits to what I am capable of doing.

But I can say things that many Brazilians do not feel safe saying: Alexandre de Moraes is a tyrant. And the only way to deal with tyrants is to confront them. It is up to Brazil’s senators to confront the tyrant. And it is up to the people of Brazil to demand that their senators do so.”

Patrick Bet-David And Charlie Kirk Offer To Host Candace Owens vs Ben Shapiro Debate On ‘Israel And The *Current* Definition Of Antisemitism.’

Ben Shapiro vs Candace Owens Antisemitism Debate
“Israeli Media Company” – Andrew Schulz SHREDS Ben Shapiro For Firing Candace Owens
Candace Owen Vs Ben Shapiro Antisemitism Debate
Ben Shapiro Weighs In On Candace Owens, Daily Wire DEBACLE
Charlie Kirk Offers To Host Owens vs Shapiro Debate

‘J6 Praying Grandma’ From Colorado Found GUILTY For Spending 10 Minutes In The Capitol Building On Jan.6: ‘I Went There To Pray For My Country’

In a courtroom decision that reverberated across the nation, Rebecca Lavrenz, the 71-year-old described as the “J6 Praying Grandma” from El Paso County, faced the judgment of the Biden Department of Justice, finding herself convicted on Thursday. Lavrenz, a great grandmother and proprietor of a bed and breakfast in Colorado, now grapples with the prospect of up to a year behind bars along with a substantial fine for her actions during the events of January 6 at the U.S. Capitol.

The trial, which saw nearly 26 hours of deliberation, culminated in Lavrenz being found guilty on four misdemeanor counts, as delineated by FBI officials. Among these charges were entering and remaining in a restricted building, disorderly and disruptive conduct both within a restricted building and the Capitol premises, and participating in a parade or demonstration within a restricted building.

Lavrenz, addressing the media, expressed her initial intent behind being present in Washington, D.C., on that fateful day. “I went there to pray,” Lavrenz stated in a conversation with Bannon, underscoring her profound faith and deep-seated concerns about the integrity of the 2020 election. Her motivation, she articulated, stemmed not only from a love for God but also a profound patriotism and familial devotion.

“I love God, my country, and my family, and I knew that something wasn’t right in that 2020 election,” Lavrenz emphasized, echoing sentiments of many individuals who participated in the events of January 6.

Reflecting on her journey into political activism, Lavrenz highlighted the tumultuous period of the COVID-19 pandemic, which catalyzed her concerns about the erosion of civil liberties. “Our country is going down with all the liberties that felt like they were stripped away from us in 2020,” she lamented. Lavrenz’s support for President Trump, whom she perceived as a bulwark against encroachments on freedom, impelled her to campaign vigorously for his reelection.

Her entrance into the Capitol, she contends, was solely for the purpose of offering prayers for the nation’s future. Lavrenz asserts that she spent a mere 10 minutes inside the building, maintaining that her actions were nonviolent and driven by a desire for spiritual intervention.

Prior to her conviction, Lavrenz maintained a public presence, updating supporters through a fundraiser on GiveSendGo, a Christian platform. Her resolve remained unyielding as she faced the legal proceedings, symbolizing her defiance against what she perceived as unjust persecution.

Former President Donald Trump took to his social media platform, Truth Social, to vehemently condemn Lavrenz’s conviction, saying it is an act of unjust targeting by the Biden administration. Trump asserted that Lavrenz, dubbed the “J6 Praying Grandma,” had been unfairly treated by “Crooked Joe Biden’s DOJ.” He lambasted the administration for prioritizing the prosecution of individuals like Lavrenz and himself over more pressing issues such as tackling violent criminals, thugs, murderers, and illegal immigrants.

“Rebecca Lavrez, also known as the ‘J6 Praying Grandma,’ has been unfairly targeted by Crooked Joe Biden’s DOJ, and now faces up to 1 YEAR in prison for peacefully walking around the Capitol, and praying for our Failing Nation on January 6th!” railed Trump. “Rebecca is a 72-year-old Grandmother and Small Business Owner from Colorado, and now she is one of Joe Biden’s J6 HOSTAGES!!! Crooked Joe Biden spends more time prosecuting Patriots like Rebecca, AND ME, than Violent Criminals, Thugs, Murderers, and ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS who are destroying our Country. THIS IS WHAT WE ARE UP AGAINST. MAGA2024!”

The Biden administration has relentlessly pursued individuals like Lavrenz, who went to peaceful protest on Jan.6 at the Capitol — over 1,265 arrests have been made since January and the prospect of more citizens facing charges this year. #TRUMP2024

Dr. Michael Nehls Says The Covid Vaccine Wasn’t About Money But ‘Conquering The Human Mind’

The Tucker Carlson Encounter: The Indoctrinated Brain How the Government Uses Fear-Mongering to Alter Your Brain

Why did the medical establishment push the Covid vax on the world even when they knew it didn’t work? Dr. Michael Nehls says it wasn’t about money. It was about conquering the human mind.

The CDC released 148-page study on Myocarditis linked to the Vaccine and EVERY WORD is redacted

The CDC released 148-page study on Myocarditis linked to the Vaccine

“That page is not blank because we messed up. That’s on purpose.”

Dr. McCullough described this move by the CDC as “gross malfeasance.”

His conclusion: “This manuscript almost certainly shows serious myocarditis as a result of the vaccines.”

“The CDC, because they’re still pushing the vaccines, they don’t wanna show this to Americans. So now the CDC is intentionally deceiving the public on an emerging public health crisis. That is, myocarditis after the vaccines.”

Related Stories:

Dr. McCullough Reveals More Bad News About the COVID ShotsVirologist Predicts Imminent ‘Tsunami of Death’ Among COVID VaccinatedThis Is What Happens When You Don’t Jab Kids: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Data

Follow @VigilantFox 🦊

Top Colombian Gang Lord Of “The Satans” ARRESTED Seeking Asylum In Texas!

Colombian Gang Leader Arrested In Texas Where He Was Seeking Asylum. He is One Of The 7 Most Wanted Murderers In Colombia’s Capital

Meet Aderbiss Pirela, the second-in-command of Colombian gang called “The Satans” and one of the seven most wanted murderers in Bogotá. He was just arrested outside of San Antonio, Texas on Tuesday SEEKING ASYLUM in the US.

Los Satanás assassins shot dead a butcher shop owner and an employee and are linked to wide-ranging drug trafficking, murder, and extortion operations in the country.

Fleeing arrest warrants, Pirela illegally crossed into Panamá via the Darien Gap and trekked through Central America.

Aderbiss Pirela of the Colombian gang called “The Satans” Arrested in Texas seeking asylum

Gualdrón crossed the US-Mexico border on January 2 and requested political asylum on January 7.

As early as January 27 authorities learned he and his associates were operating Los Satanás gang activities from a shelter in Texas.

So why was he allowed to cross at all when there were warrants for his arrest in Colombia? Why was he allowed to shelter in Texas for so long?

Joe Biden’s open border is an international magnet for the worst kind of traffickers, murderers, and animals imaginable

Biden State Department APPOINTS Zakiya Carr Johnson As Top DEIA Officer: ‘We’ve Got To Be Dismantling That Traditional Structure’

Antony Blinken, the Secretary of State, has recently appointed a new Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer at the State Department, filling a position that had been vacant for 10 months. In an announcement made on Tuesday, Zakiya Carr Johnson was named as the successor to the role.

Zakiya Carr New DEI Officer: “We’ve got to be about dismantling that traditional structure at every juncture.”

“I am appointing Zakiya Carr Johnson as the Department of State’s next Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer (CDIO). Zakiya will lead our Office of Diversity and Inclusion and advance our deep commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) in the Department. I would like to thank Conny Mayer for her leadership as Acting CDIO,” stated Blinken.

Biblical Justice vs. Social Justice | Voddie Baucham: Our mission in justice for Christians is to align ourselves with the law of God. Social justice is inherently incompatible with Biblical justice.

“American diplomacy can only succeed if it fully harnesses all of the talent that our nation has to offer. That is why I created the position of CDIO to elevate DEIA within our organization and give it the dedicated senior-level attention that it deserves,” Blinken said in a statement, referring to the acronym that stands for diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility.

“Over the past three years, the Department of State has made significant progress on this front but there remains work to be done,” he continued. “We will continue to pursue this mission aggressively, because recruiting, nurturing, and promoting the most capable workforce possible is critical to our national security.”

Johnson, who will be replacing acting CDIO Conny Mayer, “brings with her a wealth of experience in influencing gender and racial equity policy. She is the founder of Odara Solutions and a co-founder of the Black Women Disrupt Initiative. Additionally, she has served in various roles such as a senior adviser and director of the Race, Ethnicity and Social Inclusion Unit in the State Department and as a co-chair for the White House Inter-Agency Committee on Gender-Based Violence Monitoring and Evaluation.”

Antony J. Blinken is the 71st U.S. Secretary of State.
He was nominated by President Biden on November 23, 2020; confirmed by the U.S. Senate on January 26, 2021; and sworn in by Vice President Kamala Harris the following day.

“Her previous work promoting entrepreneurship and access to opportunity for underrepresented populations, as well as her commitment to inclusive leadership make us stronger, smarter, and more innovative,” Blinken praised.

However, Johnson’s appointment comes at a time when diversity, equity, and inclusion programs face increased limitations. In March, the House Office of Diversity and Inclusion (ODI) was disbanded as part of a government spending bill. Moreover, Republican lawmakers in more than 30 states have introduced or passed more than 100 bills this legislative session aimed at either restricting or regulating DEI initiatives, according to an NBC News analysis.

Blinken emphasized the importance of commitment to DEI initiatives in the State Department, highlighting their role in creating an inclusive workplace that can attract and retain the nation’s top talent.

“When the people making decisions on behalf of the American people don’t reflect the full diversity of our nation, we all lose, and our national security is weaker,” Blinken emphasized. “Together, we will ensure the United States is best positioned to meet the challenges and opportunities of an increasingly complex world.”

The Biden Administration has pushed ‘racial equity’ in every area of our national life, including in employment,” stated Project 2025, which spans nearly 900 pages.

Project 2025 is a collection of policy proposals to reshape the executive branch of the U.S. federal government in the event of a Republican victory in the 2024 U.S. presidential election.

According to conservatives affiliated with Project 2025, the private sector has been influenced by ideologies such as critical race theory. This theory posits that historical patterns of racism are deeply ingrained in law and other American institutions, leading to harm against Black people and other people of color. These conservatives seek to overturn what they perceive as “the DEI revolution in labor policy” in favor of more “race-neutral” approaches.

“We want to get rid of critical race theory from federal agencies, diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, unconscious bias – we are certainly going to have ideas and proposals ready for a possible new administration,” remarked former Trump administration official Russ Vought, who is advising Project 2025, in a recent interview with USA TODAY.

Dr. Pierre Kory On The Covid-19 Vaccines: ‘Do NOT Get Vaccinated, EVER AGAIN With An mRNA Vaccine’

Dr. Pierre Kory has an critical message for anybody who took the mRNA Covid ‘vaccines’

“Do not get vaccinated, ever again, with an mRNA vaccine. Do not let family members get vaccinated… The farther you are out from your last one, I think your prognosis is much, much better.”

Dr. Pierre Kory

The CDC released 148-page study on Myocarditis linked to the Vaccine and EVERY WORD is redacted

The CDC released 148-page study on Myocarditis linked to the Vaccine

“The CDC, because they’re still pushing the vaccines, they don’t wanna show this to Americans. So now the CDC is intentionally deceiving the public on an emerging public health crisis. That is, myocarditis after the vaccines.”

Dr. Peter Mccullough

Trump On Joe Biden Declaring Easter “Trans Visibility Day”

“November 5th is going to be called something else. You know what it’s going to be called? Christian Visibility Day when Christians turn out in numbers that nobody has ever seen before.”

Trump
BREAKING: Easter is cancelled…also, Happy Easter ❤️😂 Tom Macdonald

Patrick Bet-David SCHOOLS Bill Maher On The Difference Between Trump And Biden’s Presidency

“Two Things Libtards Cannot Handle… Facts And Truth.”

What’s So Awful?”- Bill Maher Argues why Biden Has Done a Good Job then Patrick Bet-David schools him on facts.

“Afganistan is a BullSh*t Argument” – Bill Maher Argues why Biden Has Done a Good Job

Glen Greenwald EXPOSES Ben Shapiro’s Elaborate, Hypocritical Justification For Candace Owen’s Daily Wire’s Departure

“These people, if I’m being totally honest, they make me sick. They cannot think in any form of principle whatsoever.”

Glen Greenwald
Candace Owens BREAKS SILENCE 🔥 Goes SCORCHED Earth in First Interview Since Daily Wire Firing, WOW

Jesus Is Risen

Now after the Sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to look at the tomb. And behold, a severe earthquake had occurred, for an angel of the Lord descended from heaven and came and rolled away the stone, and sat upon it. And his appearance was like lightning, and his clothing as white as snow. The guards shook from fear of him and became like dead men. And the angel said to the women, “[a]Do not be afraid; for I know that you are looking for Jesus who has been crucified. He is not here, for He has risen, just as He said. Come, see the place where He was lying. And go quickly and tell His disciples that He has risen from the dead; and behold, He is going ahead of you to Galilee. There you will see Him; behold, I have told you.”

And they left the tomb quickly with fear and great joy, and ran to report to His disciples. And behold, Jesus met them [b]and said, “[c]Rejoice!” And they came up and took hold of His feet, and worshiped Him. 10 Then Jesus *said to them, “[d]Do not be afraid; go, bring word to My brothers to leave for Galilee, and there they will see Me.”

11 Now while they were on their way, some of the men from the guard came into the city and reported to the chief priests all that had happened. 12 And when they had assembled with the elders and consulted together, they gave a large sum of money to the soldiers, 13 and said, “You are to say, ‘His disciples came at night and stole Him while we were asleep.’ 14 And if this comes to the governor’s ears, we will appease him and [e]keep you out of trouble.” 15 And they took the money and did as they had been instructed; and this story was widely spread among the Jews and is to this day.

Matthew 28

Jesus Leaving The 99 For The 1 Seems Pretty Crazy Until You Are That One”

Luke 15 | Parables of Jesus: The Parable of the Lost Sheep | The Bible

In the Bible, the parable of the lost sheep, specifically in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, Jesus shares the poignant tale of the Parable of the Lost Sheep to illustrate a fundamental aspect of God’s nature and the accessibility of His Kingdom. Through this simple yet profound story, Jesus sheds light to the depth of God’s love and His unwavering commitment to seek out and embrace those who have strayed.

Imagine a shepherd, entrusted with a flock of a hundred sheep. Despite his best efforts to keep them safe within the fold, one wanders off, lost and alone. The good shepherd, representing Jesus – God’s boundless compassion and care, doesn’t hesitate. Leaving behind the ninety-nine, he embarks on a relentless search for the one that is missing.

This act of leaving behind the majority to pursue the one lost sheep might seem irrational to some. After all, wouldn’t it be more practical to safeguard the larger group? Yet, herein lies the essence of the parable – the profound value that God places on each individual soul. The lost sheep is not forgotten or dismissed; its absence deeply concerns the shepherd.

Similarly, in our own lives, we may sometimes feel lost, disconnected, or estranged from God’s presence. We might perceive ourselves as insignificant, our struggles overshadowed by the seemingly righteous. Yet, the Parable of the Lost Sheep assures us that God’s love extends to the fringes, embracing those you have gone a stray

And so He told them this parable, saying, “What man among you, if he has a hundred sheep and has lost one of them, does not leave the other ninety-nine in the [c]open pasture and go after the one that is lost, until he finds it? And when he has found it, he puts it on his shoulders, rejoicing. And when he comes home, he calls together his friends and his neighbors, saying to them, ‘Rejoice with me, because I have found my sheep that was lost!’ I tell you that in the same way, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous people who have no need of repentance.

Luke 15

As the shepherd diligently searches for the lost sheep, so does God pursue each of us with relentless love and grace. His pursuit is not driven by obligation or duty but by an earnest desire for reconciliation. When the lost sheep is finally found, there is rejoicing – not condemnation or reproach. The shepherd’s joy knows no bounds, for the one who was lost has been restored to the fold.

The Parable Of The Lost Sheep

In the same vein, Jesus emphasizes that when a sinner repents and returns to God, there is jubilation in heaven. The extravagant celebration over the repentant sinner underscores the immeasurable joy that permeates the heart of God when one of His children comes home.

Moreover, the Parable of the Lost Sheep challenges us to reconsider our attitudes towards those who have strayed. It beckons us to emulate the shepherd’s compassion and commitment, extending grace and mercy to those who are lost and in need of redemption. Just as the shepherd prioritized the lost sheep over the ninety-nine, so should we prioritize reaching out to those who are spiritually adrift, offering them the hope and restoration found in Jesus Christ.

Ultimately, the Parable of the Lost Sheep reveals the depth of God’s love – a love that knows no bounds, transcending barriers of sin, shame, and distance. It beckons us to embrace the lost, to seek out the wandering souls, and to rejoice in their return. For in the Kingdom of God, every lost sheep is valued, cherished, and welcomed home with open arms.

“Jesus leaving the 99 for the 1 seems pretty crazy until you are that one”

Good Friday: Non Stop Beautiful Easter Songs (With Lyrics) 2024

New Easter Songs 2024 🕊️ Non Stop of Beautiful Easter Hymns (with lyrics) 🕊️ Good Friday 2024

Understanding the Significance of Good Friday in Christian Faith

Good Friday holds profound significance in the Christian calendar, commemorating what believers in consider the pivotal moment in human history. This sacred day marks the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, a pivotal event that is central to Christian theology.

He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken.

Isaiah 53:8

Christians regard Good Friday as a solemn day of reflection and remembrance. It is a time to contemplate the profound sacrifice made by Jesus Christ for the redemption of humanity. According to our Christian teachings, Jesus willingly endured the agony of crucifixion, bearing the weight of humanity’s sins upon himself. This act of selflessness is seen as the ultimate expression of God’s love for humanity (John 3:16).

Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. And they parted his raiment, and cast lots.

Luke 23:34

The narrative of Good Friday unfolds within the broader context of the Easter story. It is intricately linked to the events leading up to Jesus’ crucifixion, including his betrayal, trial, and subsequent condemnation by Pontius Pilate. The crucifixion itself symbolizes the fulfillment of divine prophecy and the culmination of Jesus’ earthly mission to reconcile humanity with God.

Come to Me, all who are weary and heavy-laden, and I will give you rest. 

To the world: “It is finished.”

To God: “Father, into your hands I commend my spirit.”

The bible recounts several remarkable occurrences that transpired during the crucifixion of Jesus:

At noon, darkness enveloped the entire region, an extraordinary phenomenon considering the time of day. Following Jesus’ death, an earthquake shook the land, accompanied by an astonishing event: the resurrection of people from the dead. This resurrection served as a potent symbol, signifying that all who put their faith in Jesus would receive forgiveness and the promise of new life.

Additionally, a significant symbolic act occurred within the temple: the tearing of the curtain in the Holy of Holies, the sacred space where God’s presence dwelled. This curtain, torn from top to bottom, symbolized the removal of barriers between humanity and God. The tearing, seemingly initiated by God himself, signified that through Jesus’ sacrifice, the way to God was now open to all. The barrier that once separated humanity from God had been abolished, granting access to divine grace and a relationship with God through faith in Jesus Christ.

For Christians, Good Friday serves as a poignant reminder of the depth of God’s grace and the extent of Jesus’ sacrifice. It is a day of solemn observance, marked by prayer, fasting, and contemplation of Jesus’ suffering on the cross. Many churches hold special services on Good Friday, where believers gather to reflect on the significance of Christ’s death and to offer gratitude for the gift of salvation.

Despite the somber tone of Good Friday, it is also viewed as a day of hope and redemption. The crucifixion is not the end of the story; it is followed by Easter Sunday, which commemorates Jesus’ resurrection and victory over death. The events of Good Friday pave the way for the triumph of Easter, symbolizing the promise of new life and eternal salvation for all who believe.

In essence, Good Friday is a sacred day that encapsulates the core faith of the Christianity – love, sacrifice, redemption, and hope. It invites believers to reflect on the profound meaning of Jesus’ death and to embrace the promise of new beginnings that Easter brings. Ultimately, Good Friday stands as a testament to the transformative power of God’s love and the enduring significance of Jesus’ sacrifice in the lives of believers around the world.

LIVE: Legal Drama Escalates As Fani Willis Saga Returns To Court! Judge Tackles Fresh Arguments On Free Speech In Georgia Trump Case

The Constitutional Right of Free Speech In Our Republic: Amidst the fervent legal debate, one fundamental question looms large: the constitutional right of free speech in Trump vs Willis case. As lawyers meticulously dissect the intricacies of the law, it becomes evident that the heart of the matter lies in preserving the bedrock principle of freedom of expression. The courtroom serves as a battleground where the clash between legal precedent and contemporary challenges unfolds.

🚨LIVE BREAKING🚨Fani Willis Saga RETURNS to Court! Judge Hears New Arguments on Georgia Trump Case

In a riveting courtroom drama, the Fani Willis saga returns to court, reigniting the contentious battle surrounding the case involving President Trump in Georgia. Lawyers and legal experts convene for a live session, armed with new arguments on free speech and a fervent determination to unravel the complexities at hand

At its core, the case underscores the delicate balance between protecting democratic discourse and upholding the rule of law. While the First Amendment safeguards individuals’ rights to express their views without fear of government reprisal.

Fani Willis Trial LIVE | Team Donald Trump Tears Into Fani Willis LIVE | Trump Vs Fani Willis LIVE

As the legal saga continues to unfold, it serves as a poignant reminder of the enduring importance of defending constitutional rights. The outcome of this courtroom drama will not only shape the trajectory of this particular case but also reverberate far beyond the confines of the courtroom, influencing the broader landscape of legal jurisprudence and democratic governance. In this crucible of legal scrutiny, the constitutional right of free speech stands as a beacon of liberty, guiding the path towards justice and democracy.

First Amendment Challenges

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irYn2Nh1q8g
BREAKING🔥 Fani Willis DISQUALIFICATION Saga – FANI’s fate in LIMBO !!!

The discourse begins with an in-depth examination of First Amendment protections within the context of the case. Counselors meticulously analyze how the principles of free speech intersect with the specific allegations, probing the boundaries of legal interpretation. One participant is heard stating, “to that it almost makes it sound like you should not be considering First Amendment challenges as applied,” underscoring the nuanced nature of the legal argument.

Implications of False Statements in Political Discourse

As the debate progresses, tensions mount over the portrayal and implications of false statements in political discourse. Attorneys grapple with the fundamental question of whether falsehoods uttered within the realm of politics should warrant legal repercussions. A poignant exchange ensues, with one speaker expressing, “if it’s false, it’s a violation of the law, and I’m saying as applied to political speech, that can’t be constitutional,” encapsulating the essence of the contentious discussion.

Constitutionality of Prosecuting Political Speech

Central to the deliberation is the constitutional validity of prosecuting political speech based on alleged falsehoods. Lawyers on both sides present compelling arguments, citing legal precedents and constitutional principles. The courtroom reverberates with impassioned statements, as legal minds clash over the delicate balance between safeguarding free speech and combating misinformation.

TRANSCRIPT

Fulton County Hearing in Trump GA Election Case. Aired 10:30- 11a ET

Aired March 28, 2024 – 10:30   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

[10:30:00]

STEVE SADOW, ATTORNEY FOR FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: — conduct or speech. We have false statements alleged in overt acts, and again, all of which are political core value, political discourse, you have false statements in overt acts 1, 5, 7, 8, 17, 93, 97, 108, 113, 133, 135, and 157.

The only allegations there are falsity. There’s no allegation beyond the fact that those statements are made, and I’m suggesting that heightened political speech has to be looked at differently.

When it comes to tweets, which is at least the way the state sets it forth, is also political speech, and here certainly by the then- president of the United States, you have tweets in 22, 26, 27, 32, 75, 100, 101, 106, 114, 128, 138, and 139. So, the majority of the overt acts involve false statements or tweets, which are clearly political speech.

How best to deal with that under the circumstances, to prosecute those under a broad RICO charge supposedly with contesting an election by, I guess, illegitimate speech or expressive conduct, or is the way that we are set up as a country is that the First Amendment plays through this by others, by those that are complaining that it’s false, proving it’s false, bringing forth the truth. That’s the essence of what Alvarez has said. That’s the essence of what a case called Brown versus Hartlage, which is cited in Alvarez. It’s 456 U.S. 45 at 61, a 1982 decision.

All of those speak in terms of when you’re dealing with that speech, that political speech, you’re best to deal with it through the pushing forth a counterview of truth, not prosecuting the speech maker or the person that is articulating his political views.

Here we’ve done just the opposite. We have decided that because of those views were unpopular and in state’s opinion false, we must prosecute them to stop them from happening again, which is, again, the essence of why it’s unconstitutional as applied because that’s not what the law says.

Finally, the rest of the overt acts, either telephone calls or meetings or requests, no false statements. They’re just acts, expressive acts, and they’re in there as well. Those are political acts. And for the court’s benefit, because I know there’s a lot of overt acts, those are 9, 14, 19, 28, 30, 31, 40, 42, 43, 44, 90, 95, 112, what was in the old indictment is 123, number two is now I think is 125. 130, 131, 140, and 156.

There is nothing alleged factually against President Trump that is not political speech. What this court has to decide is, is the state’s position that fraud or false statements under these circumstances, which I suggest really is alone, is that enough to get it by an as applied challenge? Our position is it’s not. Is there another way to look at this? They’re going to argue at the same time that it’s integral to criminal conduct, but it’s the speech that’s being punished. That is the criminal conduct. If it’s not the criminal conduct, there would never be an indictment for the RICO against President Trump or any of these other counts.

Take out the political speech, no criminal charges. Political speech disagreed with basis for all charges. I think that is the best way for me to sum up where our position is.

JUDGE SCOTT MCAFEE, SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA: All right. Thank you, Mr. Sadow. All right. Mr. Wakeford or Mr. Floyd, if there are any points that you wanted to address or respond to?

Well, I’ll start — maybe I’ll start you off with this. It certainly seems that the primary case driving Mr. Sadow’s argument would be Alvarez and — you know, because that’s a fractured kind of plurality opinion. I’m wondering if you have any thoughts on just how much that can drive this and — I know the state back in December was also citing Alvarez as the primary case. I wonder if that’s even the best one for your arguments?

[10:35:00]

DONALD WAKEFORD, CHIEF SENIOR DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FULTON COUNTY: Well, I think to address the first, I think, elephant in this courtroom is that Judge Chutkan in D.C. has evaluated all of these arguments under Supreme Court precedent already.

So, I would refer, Your Honor, to that court’s analysis because I’m hardly going to improve upon the findings of the federal judge. However, speaking specifically to Alvarez, it is a plurality opinion with several different concurring — several different opinions written by other justices. What they all agree on, though, is that Alvarez doesn’t change the law, that speech integral to criminal conduct is not protected under the First Amendment, and that that’s not what Alvarez was about. It was about punishing falsity for its own sake.

So, the question is, is that what the state is doing here? And by fundamentally rewriting the indictment, the defendant is suggesting today that that is somehow what the state is doing, when actually what the state is saying is that these statements made by the defendant were all employed as part of criminal activity, various conspiracies, frauds, intentions with deceit, and violations of the law.

It’s not just that they were false. It’s not that the defendant has been hauled into a courtroom because the prosecution doesn’t like what he said. He is free to say — to make statements and to file lawsuits and to make other legitimate protests. What he is not allowed to do is employ his speech and his expression and his statements as part of a criminal conspiracy to violate George’s RICO statute, to impersonate public officers, to file false documents, and to make false statements to the government. That’s what he’s alleged to do.

It’s never — he’s not charged under 16-10-20 because he told some lies, although it is very interesting to hear counsel for Mr. Trump tell us about the usefulness of lies. He’s not being prosecuted for lying. He’s being prosecuted for lying to the government, an act which is illegal because it does harm to the government. That’s the reason that it’s illegal. That’s why it’s different from the statute evaluated in Alvarez.

Same thing with filing a false document. It’s not just that you’ve made a false statement, it’s that you swore to it in a court document and submitted it to the court. That does harm to the judicial system. That’s obviously different from just falsity being punished for its own sake. And that is what each and every charge in the indictment is. demonstrates, is that these statements are part of criminal conduct that is larger than just the false statement on its own.

Especially with the RICO charge, where what we see is that this is a criminal organization whose members and associates engaged in various criminal activities, including but not limited to false statements and writings, impersonating a public officer, forgery, filing false documents, influencing witnesses, computer theft, computer trespass, and on and on and on.

What the defendant is suggesting to Your Honor is trying to get around to the fact that because — it’s almost saying that because these statements are false, that these charges should be dismissed, it’s like, well, you can’t punish falsity on its own, and yet each time you look at the charge, the government’s saying, the state is saying that he lied. So, that must be the end of the inquiry. But that’s not the end of the inquiry at all. That’s not what the indictment says.

It’s not just that he lied over and over and over again, as counsel for the defendant points out by listing all of the instances in the indictment, it’s that each of those was employed as part of criminal activity with criminal intentions. And we finally get to a place where it’s — where I knew we would end up, which is saying, I believe Your Honor was requested to think about it as, not as lies, but as legitimate concern about election issues.

Well, that sounds like a trial argument to me, but this is why I began by talking about intent with Your Honor because I knew we were going to end up in this exact place where he said, sure, you can look at him as lies because they weren’t true, or you could think this is just well-intentioned concerns from an American citizen speaking his mind. And that, of course, would probably be a pretty good argument to put before a jury. And I expect we will see it, but it’s not a basis for dismissing the indictment.

The whole question of intent is no doubt going to be brought up. It can only be determined by a jury. But what we have heard here today is an attempt to rewrite the indictment, to take out the parts that are inconvenient and only say, well, it’s all speech, it’s all talking, and he was just a guy asking questions and not someone who was part of an overarching criminal conspiracy trying to overturn election results for an election he did not win, by violating the RICO statute, by making false statements to the government, by filing for false documents, by impersonating officers and doing a whole host of other activity, which is harmful, in addition to the falsity of the statements employed to make them happen.

[10:40:00]

So, I think there’s been a suggestion that Your Honor can sort of reframe what you’re looking at. But Alvarez does nothing to shift the basis that the court should stand upon when evaluating the indictment. And that is to say, is this speech being punished solely because it’s false, solely because of its viewpoint or is the speech that’s being demonstrated as integral to a pattern of criminal activity?

And finally, the fact that it speaks to political concerns or core political speech, and this is something that the court in D.C. thoroughly addressed, does not change the fact that it can be employed as part of criminal conduct. The mere fact that you’re talking about issues of public concern or core political speech, which may be completely fine and protected in certain — in most contexts does not mean that you cannot be indicted if you use that kind of speech to pursue illegal activities. That’s the whole nature of the question.

So, it’s very circular, and I would direct Your Honor to page six to seven of the post hearing brief filed by defendant Trump, which says, the speech integral to criminal conduct exception of the First Amendment does not apply here because all the charged conduct constitutes First Amendment protected speech. That is a very neat circle.

The First Amendment protects us because all the speech is protected by the First Amendment. And in the end, no matter how much we hear about the — obviously the noble protections afforded by the First Amendment, all of this is an effort to get Your Honor not to look at the basic fact that this speech, this expression, all this activity is employed as part of a pattern of criminal conduct in a host of ways.

And because Your Honor is bound by the indictment and has to look at the indictment and can’t look beyond it, if we’re going to get into this at this stage, then there’s nowhere to go, as I said at the beginning, because this is all alleged as part of a pattern of criminal conduct and not protected by the First Amendment.

Any argument to the other, otherwise, is just to try to pretend like that’s not true.

MCAFEE: All right. Thank you, Mr. Wakeford.

WAKEFORD: Thank you, Your Honor.

JOHN FLOYD, FULTON COUNTY SPECIAL PROSECUTOR: Your Honor, may I add one point briefly?

MCAFEE: Sure. FLOYD: Thank you.

SADOW: Wait a second. We’re being doubled up on here?

MCAFEE: This is not a trial. I think you can handle it, Mr. Sadow.

FLOYD: And I’m just going to be on one specific point, not duplicate the argument made before.

I believe defendant Trump fundamentally misunderstands the role of an overt act in a conspiracy case. As we’ve discussed many times previously, this is a RICO conspiracy case. And so, we heard Mr. Sadow discuss various overt acts and say, well, but this is just a tweet. This is just a phone call. This was just acts. The unspoken underlying and incorrect premise then is that every overt act must be a crime.

As we’ve discussed a number of times and as the state has said forth extensively in multiple briefs, that’s not true. The purpose of an overt act is to show that the conspiracy is in operation. It is not a separate crime. It doesn’t have to satisfy the elements. It doesn’t have to be pled with that level of detail, as Your Honor acknowledges in an order, I think, that’s all of two weeks old.

And so, to say we can’t mention this particular act or this particular conduct because it’s not a crime or it’s protected by the First Amendment, the answer to that is actually so what? Because it could be First — it could legal conduct, it could be First Amendment protected conduct, that also shows there’s a conspiracy in operation. And that’s — as long as it serves that purpose, it’s fine.

And so, overt acts should not be examined by a standard that has no application to them. They are not separate freestanding offenses. And there is federal case law that — and maybe we can cite it to you, that has said an overt act can involve First Amendment activity. Its purpose is not to be something that is separately charged here or separately — subject to a separate sentence, its purpose is to show that there is a conspiracy and it’s in operation.

Georgia requires for RICO because one overt act by any one defendant. So, of course, the RICO would stand if anything, any of the 161 overt acts alleged constituted an overt act. It would only take one. It doesn’t take any by Mr. Trump.

But the point is we have an abundance of them by Mr. Trump. And for purposes of the RICO statute in the manner in which it functions, it doesn’t matter whether that’s First Amendment conduct or not. I mean, we’ve — my colleague has fully explained why much of this conduct is not shielded under any circumstance by the First Amendment, and I don’t mean to contradict that in any respect. But it’s important not to lose sight of the function the overt act plays, the role it plays in a conspiracy case here because it is not the role being suggested by defendant Trump.

[10:45:00]

MCAFEE: All right. Thank you, Mr. Floyd. All right. Mr. Sadow, I’ll give you a couple minutes, final word.

SADOW: Thank you, sir. If I heard what Mr. Floyd just said that if everything President Trump said was assumed true and included in the RICO indictment and therefore, now, we’re talking about true political speech not alleged false, he could still be prosecuted for the violation of RICO.

MCAFEE: But the overt acts, as alleged — let’s say even the overt acts ran afoul of the First Amendment. He’s saying that wouldn’t be fatal to count one.

SADOW: Because at that point, if they —

MCAFEE: There could be some other thing they prove that’s not alleged as an overt act.

SADOW: OK. That may —

MCAFEE: As I understand it.

SADOW: As I understood it as well. But what I’m suggesting is if all of the overt acts are nothing more than core political speech or expressive conduct and nothing else is alleged which is not protected by the First Amendment then you have an insufficient basis for which he has been indicted because he’s being indicted for First Amendment speech and not for unprotected speech.

And therefore, the statement that was made about, if it were true, we could still use it as an overt act suggests that they can prosecute true speech, which is what we’re trying to get to here. It’s the nature of the speech, the political speech, the heightened value of such which gives this situation different than others and the fact that it comes from then-president of the United States.

Going back to what was said in addition by the state, what the state claims is criminal here is lying to the government. That’s what it said. That’s the exact reason why in several of the Supreme Court cases it’s been found to be protected speech because it deals with the government and falsity in the sense of communication with or to the government is best dealt with through true speech not through prosecutions, because prosecutions chill speech. And when it comes to political core speech what you don’t want is chilled.

I use — fortunately I have a co-counsel that is able to pull things up and help me inform the court — until the computer shuts down. And looking at what Haley says, just to give you an idea of how the Georgia court — the Supreme Court might look at this. There’s a quote from Haley, and it says, while there is no constitutional value in false statements of fact, such erroneous statements are nevertheless inevitable in free debate, and punishment of error runs the risk of inducing a cautious and restrictive exercise of the constitutionally guaranteed freedoms of speech and press.

Accordingly, the First Amendment requires that we protect some falsehood in order to protect speech that matters. And I think that’s what we’re talking about here. To end this, and again, we’re focusing on President Trump’s conduct at the time that he, in fact, is the head of the executive branch. There is references to this in Brown v. Hartlage, and I cited that earlier. A well-publicized, yet bogus complaint on election eve raises the concerns that is — raises the concerns that you may have some impact that would affect an election.

But the preferred First Amendment remedy of more speech, not enforced silence, has special force. Underlying our dependence upon more speech is the presupposition, the right conclusions are more likely to be gathered out of a multitude of tongues than through any kind of authoritative selection. To many, this is and always will be folly, but we have staked upon it all. And for speech concerning public affairs is more than self-expression, it is the essence of self- government, and that comes from Garrison v. Louisiana, which is cited also in Alvarez.

[10:50:00]

Bottom line here is this. But for protected First Amendment speech President Trump would not be charged in RICO or the other counts. Take out the protected speech and you don’t have an underlying basis for which to charge him. And since that violates constitution as applied to the charges here and his speech here and his position here, this is ripe for a constitutional challenge.

One step further, if it’s not ripe now and we get into intent, when does the court determine that? Do you determine that after we have a trial?

MCAFEE: I think it would be the directed verdict stage, right?

SADOW: Would it?

MCAFEE: Even with all the —

SADOW: That’s a sufficiency of evidence.

MCAFEE: With all inferences, yes, in favor of —

SADOW: That’s a whole question. I mean, do we go through the whole trial? God forbid there should be a conviction and then we go back to try and determine as applied? I’m suggesting the reason it’s ripe now and the reason why we don’t even get to a trial is because it’s unconstitutional to force and accused, be it the president of the United States — former president or anyone else to stand trial on protected speech. And I think that’s what Alvarez and the progeny previous to that and after say.

MCAFEE: All right. Thank you, Mr. Sadow. All right. Mr. Gillen, do you need a minute before we dive in or can we get started? OK.

CRAIG GILLEN, ATTORNEY FOR EX-GA REPUBLICAN PARTY CHAIRMAN DAVID SHAFER: We’re free to go.

MCAFEE: OK. So, just teeing this one up. I know there’s a good bit of your motion —

LAURA COATES, CNN ANCHOR: We have been listening to this oral argument before the judge in this hearing today that’s trying to lay out reasons that he — that the Trump team and another defendant believe that this should be dismissed on First Amendment grounds.

I want to go to our panel here who is champion at the bit to weigh in. There’s a lot to unpack here on what we have seen. The primary point, of course, being that they believe that the First Amendment — the Trump council believe the First Amendment and protected speech should not should not be overturned or not be by the indictment.

Let’s go to Elie Honig first. Elie, tell me what you are seeing here and hearing through these arguments today.

ELIE HONIG, FORMER ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK: So, Laura, the core argument that we just heard from Donald Trump’s lawyers is that everything he’s being prosecuted for here is protected First Amendment political speech. And you heard the lawyer argue that even if the speech is false, even if it’s unpopular, it’s still protected.

Now, the response from the prosecutors, from the D.A.’s here, is that no, he crossed the line to where his speech became part of the charged criminal acts. Now, there’s a sort of separate dispute here about whether the court has to accept the indictments as — the allegations as they are in the indictment. Donald Trump’s team says, why do we just have to take it as a given that this was illegal because that’s what it says in the indictment, don’t we get to contest that?

And, Laura, that led to sort of the last point that we heard there, which is the question of when does this First Amendment issue get decided? And you heard the judge sort of say, well, why don’t we — isn’t the way we decide this as we put it in front of the jury and we let the jury decide at trial? Donald Trump’s lawyer objected to that. He said, no, we’d like you to throw it out now. Why go through with the whole exercise of a trial if this indictment ultimately is going to be no good?

Really important one other thing to note, Laura, this same argument was made by Donald Trump in his federal case in Washington, D.C., relating to election subversion. And the federal judge there, and you heard reference to this, Judge Chutkan, she rejected that First Amendment argument. She said, no, I find this is not protected speech. It crossed the line into criminality and we’ll leave it for the jury.

So, Trump’s team is fighting an uphill battle here legally, but the judge is willing to hear them out.

COATES: I mean, they are fighting. I want to go to our table as well. It wasn’t just that Judge Chutkan said she rejected it, she was saying, look, if it turns out that you cannot prove it was a false statement or a knowing false statement, then he hasn’t been convicted. It doesn’t mean the indictment itself is problematic.

Sara, let me go to you here. You’ve been covering this story really since the beginning of it all. You’re hearing arguments being made that suggest that all of this was just political speech. It’s what’s done, Sara, and everyone else is naive if you think this is not how the game is played.

SARA MURRAY, CNN POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT: Yes. I mean, I think you hear Steve Sadow, Trump’s attorney there, saying, look, these are tweets. These are phone calls. And, you know, even if he is providing false statements, even if he’s making false statements, that the way to handle this is to rebut them with truthful statements, not to prosecute the former president for the way he made these false statements.

And I do think it was telling that we saw, you know, Donald Wakeford, one of the prosecutors on the D.A.’s team, come up and say, this is not just about Donald Trump showing up, going in front of America and lying. That’s not what this is. This is about making sworn statements that you knew were false in documents and submitting those to the government. This is about using those lies in furtherance of a criminal conspiracy, in furtherance of a scheme that violates George’s RICO law.

And again, we saw another one of the prosecutors stand up and point out that not every one of these things that he did has to be a crime in and of itself. That’s the way George’s law works. The phone call itself doesn’t have to be a crime. The Tweet itself doesn’t have to be a crime. It’s about how this all builds together to the broader racketeering conspiracy here.

And so, again, I do think that it is an uphill battle. We’ll see, though.

[10:55:00]

COATES: Well, we’ll see. I mean, certainly, it’s uphill when you have them only talking in legal terms. I mean, at — I mean, quarter words are fine. Why the $10 stuff, lawyers take note.

Anyways, Kristen, when you’re looking at this politically, he’s saying, and that’s been his party line the entire time, this is just me talking and my campaigning. What am I to do? I’m a campaigning person, I believe the laws have been violated by not saying that I won, so I’m doing.

KRISTEN HOLMES, CNN CORRESPONDENT: And he continues to do that today. I mean, this wasn’t just in 2020, this is his entire line of argument all the time. But I will say this, you know, I’m talking to Donald Trump s team, this isn’t an argument that they’re banking on. They are not expecting this 100 percent to work.

This is, as they continue to remind me, that they are paying lawyers in all of these cases a lot of money, and they should be exhausting every single avenue and spending as much time as they possibly can to draw this out. And if they aren’t, then they aren’t doing their job. And remember, the main tactic here, as we have said over and over again, is to delay this beyond the November election. And that is the point of why they continue to file separate motions, all of these pre- trial hearings.

You’re not going to see it stop, because what they’re trying to do is push — you know, we heard Fani Willis saying she still wants that August court date, they were trying push beyond November.

COATES: And, Paula, real quick, what do you think in terms of the main takeaways here? You’ve been covering this from all angles and their whole tactic is delay, in this case, dismiss.

PAUL REID, CNN CHIEF LEGAL AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENT: And there’s a long game here, right? Because the delay game could run out at some point. So, I am told they are playing the long-game, even if this won’t win, of course they’re going to file every actionable item on behalf of their client, as they should.

They also have to files some of these things so they don’t wave them on appeal. And their strategy for appeal is they hope that over the course of — if there is a trial, of the trial in this entire case, there’ll be enough mistakes that add up that they can perhaps get this tossed sort of death by a thousand cuts. So, they are playing the long game.

COATES: Really quick. Paula, tell me this. Who is Shafer? Remind the audience because this is — his attorney getting ready to talk. We’re about to actually go to the hearing. Quick answer about who he is.

REID: He’s one of the alleged fake electors.

COATES: Let’s hear him.

CRAIG GILLEN, ATTORNEY FOR EX-GA REPUBLICAN PARTY CHAIRMAN DAVID SHAFER: — as — after it was filed, it talks about how other case law in Georgia, when it talks, about first of all 16-10-23, doesn’t define public officer. So, we start from that, so we’ve got that out there, does not defining the public officer.

Now — but the still pleading does say that the issue of what — who is and is not a public officer is addressed in other contexts in Georgia law, usually in the “merit proceedings” where somebody is trying to find out the legitimacy of somebody having or holding a particular office.

And in that context, there are cases citing in this still pleading that address this very matter. They cite Brown v. Scott and — as a case in which the Brown v. Scott case, you know, whether or not an individual has designation or title given to him by law or exercises functions concerning the public assigned to them by the law, they cite Brown, that doesn’t — the inquiry doesn’t really end there.

The George Supreme Court has termed — noted the term public officer involves the idea of tenure, duration, fees, emoluments, and powers as well as that of duty. And so that’s a McDuffie v. Ferguson and that has to do really with grand jurors.

So, when someone says, well, it is a grand juror, a public author, and the court, you know, breaks down an analysis talking about that saying, not really because grand jurors may only meet for a few days. You know, they’re not essentially — you know, they’re not there for some sort of duration or tenure. They don’t take the same oath of office as prescribed for public officers. And they lack the element of tenure and duration, which must exist to qualify as a public officer.

Well —

MCAFEE: So, how would that apply, again, to like a purely fictional task force?

GILLEN: Well, I mean, let’s forget the purely fiction taskforce. It would — let us have it — that — the case law from our Supreme Court, how it applies to our case and how it applies to our cases, the presidential electors are not people who have a lengthy tenure duration, which it must exist. Frankly, their job is to meet for one day.

MCAFEE: I see your framework there, but if the framework is actually in this — whereas Metro Atlantic human trafficking, of course it doesn’t even exist.

GILLEN: Well, it doesn’t. But someone is pertaining to be an agent —

[11:00:00]

Legal Battles And Constitutional Questions: Key Points In The Fani Willis Disqualification Case

Attorneys for Donald Trump were inside the Fulton County courthouse today asking the judge to dismiss the charges against the former president. When you look at the allegations against President Trump, all of the allegations involved expressive conduct or speech. Mr. Trump’s defense attorney, Steve Sow, argued Thursday that the former president’s allegedly criminal conduct was actually political speech related to the 2020 election. That speech, he said, was protected by the First Amendment.

https://youtu.be/irYn2Nh1q8g?si=5-6hKjEOKfAxGSD8
BREAKING🔥 Fani Willis DISQUALIFICATION Saga – FANI’s fate in LIMBO !!!

[Reporter:] Now we are following the latest in the Fulton County District Attorney disqualification saga. It is the first hearing since the judge decided to leave left-leaning, anti-Trump District Attorney Fani Willis on the case. Of course, there was a catch. Fani Willis had to ditch her former lover and lead prosecutor Nathan Wade. She called him a Southern gentleman, and he was cheating on his wife with Fani. Anyway, with Wade gone, the case moves on.

A judge in Georgia heard arguments over whether former President Donald Trump’s speech was protected by his First Amendment rights. The hearing is part of the former president’s election interference case. Trump’s lawyers argued that the charges against him are an effort to criminalize political speech. Arguments are underway on motions to dismiss the case from Trump’s attorneys and one of the codefendants. Trump wants to throw the case out entirely. His attorneys cite the First Amendment and argue since he served as president, Trump’s speech is political speech, the most protected type of speech under the Constitution.

Judge Hears Pre-Trial Motion In Trump Fulton Country Case

One of Trump’s codefendants’ attorneys said, “We’ve got the freedom to associate, the freedom to petition the government, the freedom to speak. So all of this conduct that’s part of this indictment is really covered by the First Amendment. And if you think about it, it makes sense that a judge should be the one that protects that right because you shouldn’t have to go in front of a jury to protect your constitutional rights.”

Fulton County DA Disqualification Saga: The saga involved Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis facing a potential disqualification from a case. The judge ultimately allowed her to remain on the case, but under the condition that her former lover and lead prosecutor, Nathan Wade, be removed due to ethical concerns. This decision came after significant deliberation and likely impacted the dynamics of the case, potentially raising questions about impartiality and procedural integrity.

First Amendment Protections for Trump’s Speech: Central to the proceedings was the debate over whether former President Donald Trump’s speech, particularly concerning the 2020 election, was protected by the First Amendment. Trump’s legal team argued that the charges against him amounted to an attempt to criminalize political speech, which enjoys the highest level of protection under the Constitution. This argument underscores the complex intersection between free speech rights and legal accountability, especially in the context of contentious political issues.

Challenges with Indictment Wording: Defense attorneys raised concerns about the language used in the indictment, highlighting phrases such as “fake electors” and “fraudulent,” which they argued were legal conclusions rather than factual allegations. They contended that such language should be stricken from the indictment, as it could prejudice the case and potentially infringe upon the defendant’s rights. This aspect of the proceedings sheds light on the nuances of legal language and the importance of precision in drafting legal documents.

Criticism of Judge’s Ruling and Planned Appeal: The judge’s decision to allow Fani Willis to remain on the case drew criticism from defense attorneys, who questioned the procedural aspects of the ruling and expressed skepticism about the judge’s confidence in the decision. As a result, the defense indicated their intention to appeal the ruling, signaling a continued legal battle over the handling of the case and potentially raising broader questions about judicial oversight and discretion.

Defense Argument for Dismissal Based on First Amendment: Trump’s defense team reiterated their argument that all allegations against him were rooted in expressive conduct or speech, which they asserted was political speech protected by the First Amendment. They urged the judge to either dismiss the charges outright or revise the indictment to reflect the protected nature of political speech. This aspect of the proceedings highlights the complex legal arguments surrounding the interpretation and application of constitutional rights in the context of criminal proceedings.

Steve Bannon On Baltimore Bridge Collapse: ‘I’m NOT Buying That”

“How the ship turned directly into that and the pilot didn’t drop the anchor? Dropping the anchor might’ve ripped the front of the ship apart but it wouldn’t have taken out the bridge.”

Steven Bannon On The War Room

General Flynn Says The TRUTH Is Coming Out In The Baltimore Bridge Collapse: ‘It Is A BLACK SWAN Event’

In the aftermath of a devastating traffic incident, General Flynn weighed in, asserting that the cargo ship collision involving the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore was a ‘BLACK SWAN event’, event, and it’s much bigger then we know.

“The TRUTH is coming out in the Baltimore bridge collapse” General Mike Flynn | Redacted News

“This is a BLACK SWAN event.

Black swans normally come out of the world of finance (not military). The standard operating procedures for all U.S. ports, harbors, and bays that transit commerce and military activities are supposed to maintain an incredible level of discipline, rigor and awareness for these very type events to not occur (ever!), yet here we are.

There are harbor masters for every single one of these transit points in America that are in charge of assuring the safety of navigation…start there.”

General Mike Flynn

The tragedy unfolded on March 26, 2024, when Baltimore’s Key Bridge collapsed following a collision with a 984-foot cargo ship, leaving six individuals presumed dead, including members of a road construction crew.

In the video footage captured the dramatic moment when the entire bridge structure plummeted into the water upon impact with the ship’s pillar. Governor Wes Moore noted that a distress call, or “mayday,” from the ship’s crew enabled authorities to halt incoming traffic, potentially averting further casualties.

Francis Scott Key Bridge, Baltimore

Click Here: Remote Controlled Robot Hybrid Pro Lawn Mower

Farm, Lawn, Garden and Home Orchard: Yamaha Engine

Dive teams from various state and local agencies were swiftly mobilized to aid in search-and-rescue operations. Initially comprising 50 personnel, the mission expanded over time. However, the Coast Guard announced Tuesday evening the suspension of its active search-and-rescue operation, transitioning to a different phase.

Eight individuals were present on the bridge at the time of its collapse. While at least two were rescued, one of whom was subsequently discharged from the hospital, the fate of the others remains uncertain.

Francis Scott Key Bridge, Baltimore

Authorities are diligently working to ascertain the exact circumstances leading to the crash. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) will conduct a thorough investigation into the bridge’s construction and structural integrity. NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy emphasized that determining any prior safety concerns regarding the bridge will require meticulous examination.

In the midst of the crisis, Senator Chris Van Hollen recognized the formidable and expensive task ahead in rebuilding the bridge. Senior White House adviser Tom Perez urged caution, emphasizing that it’s too early to speculate on the timeline for reconstruction.

Francis Scott Key Bridge, Baltimore

In a surprising revelation, President Joe Biden claimed to have traveled over the Baltimore bridge by train “many times,” despite its lack of any rail track. As he continued reading from his script, he underscored the government’s resolute commitment to fully finance the bridge’s reconstruction, thus exonerating the owner of the container ship DALI from financial responsibility. Various potential funding sources, such as the Federal Highway Administration and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, are being deliberated, with Congress actively exploring additional options for funding.

Faith Can Move Mountains Mustard Seed Women’s Tee – Christian Faith Bible Verse – Retro T-Shirt

Order Here: Donald Trump USA 2024 Baseball Caps

General Mike Flynn

Faith Can Move Mountains Mustard Seed Women’s Tee – Christian Faith Bible Verse – Retro T-Shirt

EU Diplomat On Russia-Ukraine War Says It’s Not “Because We Love Ukrainian People. It’s a Matter Of Our Own Interest.”

EU’s top diplomat, Borrell discussed the Russia-Ukraine war on CNN: “We cannot afford for Russia to win the war, otherwise the US and European interests would be damaged.

It’s not a matter of generosity, supporting Ukraine because we love Ukrainian people. It’s a matter of our own interest.”

Trump 2024 Caps

Baltimore’s Francis Key Bridge COLLAPSES After Ship Collision: A Catastrophic Incident Unfolds

One X user, going by the name of cackenbooldU/G-t, posted a chilling video : “Alternative angle on Francis Scott Key bridge shows a large explosion.” However, it’s crucial to clarify that X added a disclaimer on this video saying that it “depicts an attack on the Kerch Strait bridge in Crimea, not the Francis Scott Key bridge.”

The bustling city of Baltimore was struck by a calamity of monumental proportions when the Francis Scott Key Bridge succumbed to a devastating collapse following a collision with a cargo ship. Amidst the chaos and urgency of rescue efforts, the city found itself grappling with a disaster that plunged lives into jeopardy, sparking a flurry of activity along the Patapsco River.

The latest update on the video reveals that One X user, identified as cackenbooldU/G-t, shared a chilling observation on a post: “Alternative angle on Francis Scott Key bridge shows a large explosion.” However, it’s crucial to clarify that the video depicts an attack on the Kerch Strait bridge in Crimea, not the Francis Scott Key bridge.

Initial reports painted a harrowing picture of the scene, with dozens of vehicles careening into the frigid waters of the Patapsco River as the bridge gave way. Construction workers, diligently toiling on the bridge at the time of impact, found themselves amidst the wreckage, adding to the urgency of the rescue mission.

Francis Scott Key Bridge Collapse

Eyewitness accounts described a scene of chaos and destruction, punctuated by a thunderous explosion emanating from the container ship as it collided with the bridge. The force of the impact sent containers tumbling into the water, mingling with the concrete intended for road construction and diesel fuel, further complicating rescue efforts.

Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott took to social media to address the unfolding crisis, acknowledging his awareness of the incident and affirming his communication with Governor Wes Moore and other local authorities. He swiftly announced his departure to the scene to assess the situation firsthand.

“Emergency responders are actively engaged on-site, and comprehensive efforts are underway,” Mayor Scott stated on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

The vessel involved in the collision, identified as the Dali, a Singaporean-flagged container ship stretching 948 feet in length, found itself ensnared beneath the bridge following the crash. Despite the magnitude of the collision, the ship’s owners reassured that all crew members were safe and unharmed, with no reports of pollution stemming from the incident.

The Francis Scott Key Bridge, inaugurated in 1977 following an extensive five-year construction period at an estimated cost of $110 million, pays homage to the author of “The Star-Spangled Banner.” Among the trio of toll crossings gracing Baltimore’s harbor, it stands as a vital artery for the city’s transportation network.

As emergency responders swarmed the area, marked by the ominous silhouette of the collapsed bridge, the magnitude of the catastrophe became painfully apparent. With the bridge’s collapse disrupting a vital artery of Baltimore’s transportation network, the urgency to rescue and recover those affected intensified.

Francis Scott Key Bridge Collapse

In a report released by the Maryland state government in November of 2023, it was revealed that the Key Bridge facilitated the passage of over 12.4 million commercial and passenger vehicles throughout the preceding year, underscoring its significance in the region’s infrastructure landscape.

Kevin Cartwright, director of communications for the Baltimore Fire Department, characterized the situation as “a dire emergency,” emphasizing the paramount importance of swift and decisive action in the face of adversity.

The aftermath of the collapse raised questions and concerns about the structural integrity of the bridge. Ian Firth, a seasoned structural engineer and bridge designer, speculated that the ship had deviated from its course, striking a critical support structure of the bridge with devastating consequences. The precarious state of the bridge further complicated rescue efforts, necessitating caution and precision in the face of looming dangers.

Francis Scott Key Bridge Collapse

Amidst the chaos and devastation, the unwavering dedication of first responders and emergency personnel shone through. With each passing moment, they labored tirelessly to rescue and aid those caught in the turmoil, demonstrating courage and resilience in the face of adversity.

As the city of Baltimore grapples with the aftermath of this tragic incident, solidarity and support pour in from all corners. Elected officials, including Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott and Maryland authorities, mobilize resources and coordinate relief efforts to address the unfolding crisis.

American Patriots Durable And High Quality 3×5, 4×6, 5×8, 6x10ft – 3D Stars- Sewn Stripes and Brass Grommets – USA Embroidered Flag

American Patriots Durable And High Quality 3×5, 4×6, 5×8, 6x10ft – 3D Stars- Sewn Stripes and Brass Grommets – USA Embroidered Flag

Candace Owens Triggers People For ‘Christ is King’ Tweet: Accused Of Anti-Semitism As Daily Wire Faces Backlash

“The reason why some people believe that with enough insistence they can convince American Christians that the basic truth, “Christ is King” is actually antisemitic, is because they have been successfully spiking the ball on Christianity for the past 60 years.

Inch by inch, by pretending to be our friends and making us fearful of having the media project us as overzealous is how they have scored so many wins. It’s how mocking Christ has become commonplace in Hollywood.

The reality is that they accuse us of what they are guilty of: they hold contempt for Christianity.

The reality is that Christ consciousness is rising throughout the world and any person who is attempting to use methods of psychology to make people pause before they profess their faith is not on the side of Goodness.”

Candace Owens
Jesus Saved My Life T-Shirt

Trial Begins for Arizona Rancher, 75, Accused of Fatally Shooting Migrant On His Property

The trial of an Arizona rancher for the fatal shooting of a migrant on his property near the Mexican border commenced on Friday. George Alan Kelly, 75, faces charges of second-degree murder in connection with the killing of a man he encountered on his property outside Nogales, Arizona. The trial, taking place in Santa Cruz County Superior Court, is anticipated to extend for up to a month. Kelly’s defense maintains his innocence amidst a backdrop of heightened national debate over border security, particularly in light of the upcoming presidential election..

WATCH LIVE: Killing On The Ranch Trial — AZ v. George Kelly — Day 1

Kelly stands accused of second-degree murder in the killing of a man he encountered on his property outside Nogales, Arizona. The trial is anticipated to last up to a month, with proceedings scheduled four days a week until around April 19. Kelly’s defense attorney, Brenna Larkin, asserts his innocence, emphasizing concerns about biased investigation procedures and incomplete evidence.

The tragic event unfolded on January 30, 2023, when Kelly, spotting a group of unarmed migrants traversing his cattle ranch, allegedly fired his weapon, resulting in the death of 48-year-old Gabriel Cuen-Buitimea from neighboring Nogales, Mexico. Larkin argues that Kelly, fearing for his safety and that of his property, discharged his firearm into the air, aiming to deter potential threats posed by the migrants. According to Larkin, Kelly’s ranch had experienced escalating encounters with individuals crossing the property, including drug and human smugglers, prompting him to arm himself as a precautionary measure.

Contrary to the defense’s claims, prosecutors contend that Kelly ‘recklessly’ fired his AK-47 rifle toward the migrants, situated approximately 100 yards away, with a handgun also in his possession. Santa Cruz County Chief Deputy Attorney Kim Hunley urged jurors to view Cuen-Buitimea as a human being rather than as described by Kelly, emphasizing the gravity of the situation.

Moreover, Kelly faces additional charges of aggravated assault against another individual within the migrant group, further complicating the legal proceedings. The prosecution maintains that the group, including Daniel Ramirez, a Honduran seeking work in the U.S., had scattered in response to Border Patrol activity and was en route back to Mexico when the fatal shooting occurred. Ramirez is slated to testify during the trial.

The case has garnered attention from the Mexican consulate in Nogales, Arizona, which has been in contact with the victim’s family, underscoring its significance amid heightened concerns about border security. This incident adds to a string of similar tragedies, including a 2022 shooting in West Texas involving twin brothers Michael and Mark Sheppard, highlighting the complex and contentious nature of border enforcement policies.

As the trial unfolds, it intersects with broader political discourse surrounding border security, a central theme in the upcoming presidential election. The debate intensifies against the backdrop of recent visits by both Donald Trump and Joe Biden to the Texas-Mexico border, underscoring the significance of this issue on the national stage.

Statistics on Illegal Immigration under the Biden Administration

Under President Biden’s administration, the number of illegal immigrants in the United States has surged dramatically contributing to ongoing concerns regarding border security. In 2020, the country counted approximately 10.2 million immigrants, and since Biden assumed office, an additional 10 million have entered unlawfully. If we were to aggregate these 20 million illegal immigrants into a single state, their population would equate to that of New York, placing it among the top states in terms of population.

In his latest post on Saturday, President Donald Trump heightened his critique of Joe Biden’s border policies. Taking to Truth Social, Trump lambasted Biden’s administration, declaring, “Four years ago we had the strongest and safest Border in U.S. history. Now we have the worst Border anywhere in the World, EVER!!! OUR BORDERS HAVE COMPLETELY COLLAPSED, AND MANY CRIMINALS ARE POURING INTO OUR COUNTRY. MAGA2024!”

Trump’s scathing remarks underscored the contentious nature of immigration, which has emerged as a pivotal issue ahead of the 2024 presidential election. Recent statistics paint a stark picture of the challenges at the border, with migrant encounters skyrocketing in the current fiscal year. In October, there were 309,114 encounters, followed by 308,669 in November and a staggering 371,036 in December.

Of particular concern is the influx of migrants arriving through Mexico, with approximately 300,000 individuals, averaging nearly 10,000 per day, entering the United States in December alone. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data revealed that roughly 250,000 of these arrivals occurred between ports of entry.

The surge in migrant encounters has strained federal resources, with border agents grappling with a record-breaking influx of approximately 2.5 million migrants throughout the previous year, surpassing the already staggering figures from the year before.

Despite the escalating crisis, bipartisan efforts to address border security have faltered in Congress. A proposed bill aimed at bolstering enforcement measures and granting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) authority to temporarily shut down the border during surges of crossing attempts failed to gain GOP support earlier this year.

As the presumptive GOP nominee in the 2024 presidential race, Trump has repeatedly pledged to prioritize border security if reelected in November. His vocal criticism of Biden’s handling of immigration underscores the deep ideological divide surrounding this pressing issue.

Elderly Couple’s Home Stolen, Husband Arrested In DeKalb County Fraud Case

In a heartbreaking turn of events, a 77-year-old man finds himself handcuffed, his home stolen, and his world shattered. A Stone Mountain couple’s tranquil existence turned tumultuous when they were suddenly evicted from the place they had called home for over two decades, victimized by a shocking case of fraud.

Charmaine Allman, recounting the ordeal to Channel 2’s Investigative Reporter Ashli Lincoln, described the devastating moment when they discovered their belongings scattered across their yard. The reason? Their home had been sold without their knowledge, leaving them branded as trespassers by the DeKalb County Marshal’s Office.

Thrown into chaos, the couple felt the weight of injustice as their sanctuary was usurped by a stranger armed with fraudulent documents. Allen, Allman’s husband, expressed his disbelief at the treatment they received, with their possessions callously discarded like rubbish.

The situation took a dire turn when Allen was arrested for his refusal to vacate the premises, leaving Allman distraught at the sight of her elderly husband in handcuffs. “How does this happen, period?” she questioned, grappling with the cruel reality of their situation. “He has nowhere to go. No family.”

Their ordeal began with suspicious letters alleging a phantom second mortgage, a claim vehemently denied by the couple. Yet, by Tuesday, their worst fears materialized as an unknown individual laid claim to their home, citing a foreclosure purchase.

Investigating the matter, Lincoln confronted the alleged perpetrator, who evaded questions and retreated indoors upon spotting the probing cameras. The lack of accountability underscored the vulnerability of homeowners in the face of such fraudulent schemes.

Legal expert Richard Alembik shed light on the prevalence of such fraud, citing the ease with which deceitful deeds are recorded. Notaries, tasked with verification, often falter, leaving homeowners exposed to exploitation.

With her husband incarcerated, Allman grapples with the injustice that has befallen them. Despite the potential for exoneration, the road to reclaiming their home appears daunting, highlighting the flaws within the system.

The stolen home saga serves as a sobering reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in property ownership and the pressing need for systemic reforms to protect homeowners from predatory practices. As the Allmans navigate the wreckage of their shattered lives, their plight stands as a poignant call to action, urging vigilance and advocacy to prevent others from enduring a similar fate.

In a Heartfelt Video Message, The Princess Of Wales, Kate Middleton Revealed That She Has Been Diagnosed With Cancer

In a poignant video message released on Friday, Kate Middleton, the Princess of Wales, shared the news that she has been diagnosed with cancer. Presented here is her statement in its entirety.

“I wanted to take this opportunity to say thank you, personally, for all the wonderful messages of support and for your understanding whilst I have been recovering from surgery.

It has been an incredibly tough couple of months for our entire family, but I’ve had a fantastic medical team who have taken great care of me, for which I am so grateful.

In January, I underwent major abdominal surgery in London and at the time, it was thought that my condition was non-cancerous. The surgery was successful. However, tests after the operation found cancer had been present. My medical team therefore advised that I should undergo a course of preventative chemotherapy and I am now in the early stages of that treatment.

This of course came as a huge shock, and William and I have been doing everything we can to process and manage this privately for the sake of our young family.

As you can imagine, this has taken time. It has taken me time to recover from major surgery in order to start my treatment.

But, most importantly, it has taken us time to explain everything to George, Charlotte and Louis in a way that is appropriate for them, and to reassure them that I am going to be ok.

As I have said to them; I am well and getting stronger every day by focusing on the things that will help me heal; in my mind, body and spirits.

Having William by my side is a great source of comfort and reassurance too. As is the love, support and kindness that has been shown by so many of you. It means so much to us both.

We hope that you will understand that, as a family, we now need some time, space and privacy while I complete my treatment. My work has always brought me a deep sense of joy and I look forward to being back when I am able, but for now I must focus on making a full recovery.

At this time, I am also thinking of all those whose lives have been affected by cancer. For everyone facing this disease, in whatever form, please do not lose faith or hope. You are not alone.”

Michigan Lawyer ARRESTED For Submitting ‘Evidence Of Numerous Crimes’ Of Election Fraud Including Emails From Dominion Voting Systems

“They’re now arresting the people exposing election fraud instead of those committing it.”

Judge Jeffrey S. Matis from the Oakland County Circuit Court issued a warrant for Lambert Junttila concerning a case involving “evidence of numerous crimes” including internal emails from Dominion voting machines from 2020. The warrant was granted upon the prosecution’s request as Lambert Junttila repeatedly failed to comply with the legal requirement of providing fingerprints and a DNA sample. Stefanie Lambert, a Michigan attorney known for her claims of election fraud, surrendered herself on Thursday morning to address the bench warrant issued by Judge Matis two weeks prior.

Tucker Carlson: The 2020 Election Was ‘100% STOLEN’ From Trump
Michigan Lawyer Stefanie Lambert

Accompanied by her attorney Dan Hartman, Lambert appeared before Judge Matis three days after being arrested by the U.S. Marshals Service in Washington, D.C., due to the bench warrant issued on March 7 when she failed to appear for a court hearing.

Lambert faces four felony charges in Michigan related to acquire and improperly access voting machines used in the 2020 presidential election. Magistrate Heide Herrmann released Lambert from custody in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, instructing her to surrender to Michigan authorities promptly, which Lambert did on Thursday morning.

Carlson: “It was 100 percent stolen. Are you joking?”

FRIDMAN: “Like, it was rigged to that large of a scale?”

Carlson: “Yeah. They completely changed the way people vote right before the election on the basis of Covid, which had nothing to do —“

FRIDMAN: “So, in that way it was rigged? Meaning, like —“

Carlson: “100 percent. And then —“

FRIDMAN: “— manipulated?”

PLANNED PARENTHOOD

IF PLANNED PARENTHOOD WAS KILLING PUPPIES INSTEAD OF BABIES, AMERICA WOULD HAVE SHUT THEM DOWN BY NOW!

🎙Reporter to Matt Gaetz: “Is it safe to say that, based off your comments, you’re suggesting that these women at these abortion rallies are ugly and overweight?:

Gaetz: “Yes. Be Offended”

✝️ Divine Intervention In Real-Time

When A Pro-Abortion Man Tries To Kick Over A Church’s Pro-Life Sign!

Trump Launches Defamation Lawsuit Against ABC News and Stephanopoulos Over Rape Claim in Nancy Mace Interview

In a federal court filing lodged in Miami, former President Donald Trump has initiated legal action against ABC News and George Stephanopoulos, demanding unspecified damages for alleged defamation. The lawsuit stems from Stephanopoulos’ line of questioning directed at Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) during a widely-publicized interview on the network’s “This Week” program on March 10.

Nancy Mace Interview With George Stephanopoulos

The interview drew widespread attention as Mace, herself a survivor of sexual assault, accused Stephanopoulos of employing tactics intended to “shame” her for her endorsement of Trump, despite recent legal developments in lawsuits brought by E. Jean Carroll. These suits saw Trump held ‘liable for sexual abuse’ under New York law, though he was not found guilty of rape—a fact that Stephanopoulos repeatedly emphasized during the interview.

Trump has indeed pursued legal action against numerous media outlets in the past, including CNN, The Washington Post, and The New York Times. Despite his persistent efforts, these lawsuits have generally been unsuccessful. Additionally, President Trump sought to countersue Carroll after she persisted in accusing him of rape on cable news following the jury’s verdict. However, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan, appointed by former President Clinton, dismissed Trump’s counterclaims.

TRANSCRIPT: Rabbi Says Candace Owens Is An ‘Anti-Semite’: “This Is Crazy! Rabbi Barclay Attacks Me For Things I Never Said.”

“I hold no hatred in my heart against Jews I just don’t believe any group is exceptional, I don’t believe any group Black, White, Spanish, you watch my show you’re going to get offended and I am always going to call out wrongness when I see it and to the extent that we are using anti-Semitism as a tool to bar people from critiquing certain individuals”

Candace Owens

WATCH FULL INTERVIEW

This Is Crazy! Rabbi Barclay Attacks Me For Things I Never Said.

AUTO – TRANSCRIPT

00:00

all right everybody let’s jump right into this a very exciting episode for you today here in my hands I am holding an article that was published by PJ media the title is let’s be honest Candace Owens is a Jew hating bigot it was written by a rabbi Rabbi Michael barklay so I read this article and honestly there are only two options here either this Rabbi is genuinely ignorant of everything that I have ever said in which case I’m happy to clarify it because he will be joining us on today’s episode episode or the other option is

00:32

he’s completely aware of the things that I have said and he is just a monster I’m excited to find out when we sit down here with Rabbi arlay that’s what we have coming up on cace [Music] Owens all right guys we’re going to jump right into this as I stated at the top of the show we have Rabbi Michael barklay he is by the way joining us really last second so if the shot is not perfect really appreciate him coming on such short notice um Rabbi Michael barklay welcome to the show thank you thank you for having me Candace and

01:12

Candace I I really want to tell you you know I’ve written certain things and it and it gives me great optimism um that you’re gracious and reached out yesterday and and wanted to get together actually makes me very optimistic yes so I am the ultimate defender of free speech and I believe that we need more more speech not less of it when we see things and we believe them not to to be true rather than censoring that individual we should actually give that person a platform because people will walk away and be

01:40

able to assess whether or not the statements they heard was true and so just to give a little bit of background to people listening to this you appeared on Charlie Kirk’s show and you referred to me as anti-semitic is that correct okay not only that not only that Candace I’ve actually written a couple of Articles one in November and one last week about your anti-Semitism yeah correct um and referring to that article that you wrote last week published on March 9th it the heading reads let’s be honest

02:11

Candice Owens is a Jew hating bigot so that’s very Punchy very strong language and I want to actually go through this article Point by point so that you can defend your position and say why you wrote this Candace I think before that and as I said I’m very optimistic that you would have dialog about something I think before that there are some some real steps which is I have called you and I’m not alone in this many Jews have called you an anti-semite also talk to people who say you have a really sweethart just so you

Why Does Everyone Think I Am Going To Be Killed?

02:46

know you and I have a number of mutual friends uh in the world but I think it’s important to first identify what anti-Semitism is it is a different type of hate than any other type of hate in the world and if you and I are speaking Crossways because we have a different understanding and definition yeah that’s not going to lead to any dialogue that’s not going to Le look I I said to scholar I’d love to walk out of here and say you know what I was wrong and write an article I apologize and I was wrong but

03:16

the first piece is to have a mutual and understanding of what is anti-Semitism I think that would help a tremendous amount totally agree with you on that that is a perfect place to start could you provide for us a definition of anti-Semitism I absolutely I really appreciate that because I think that is the break if we’re not speaking the same language what can we go right so there’s a man um a blessed memory man named Lord Jonathan uh saxs he was the chief Rabbi of England he had a great line he really

03:47

defined anti-Semitism um that that anti-Semitism is Jews have no right to exist collectively as Jews with the same rights as other human beings it’s kind of weird statement we just track back a to understand the history of anti-Semitism 2,000 years ago Jews don’t accept Jesus as Messiah for people who do not have faith as the early Christians as some of them have faith some of them accept Jesus but they don’t really in their heart and you and I know both know people like Rob McCoy who accepts it fully in their heart other

04:19

people who are doing it without faith and they’re they there those who have less Faith the fact that a Jew exists let alone thrives is a threat to their faith because how can the Jew not accept Jesus as God and still Thrive unless he’s associated with the devil so you start having these these myths that are created of the Jew being identified with the opposite of God this really codifies in 1144 in Norwich England What’s called the bloodline this is really important to understand especially today in 2024 in 1144 a young

04:56

boy is killed and the local priest says that’s because the Jews need to make their mozah with Christian blood it’s called The Blood life let blame blame the problems of other people on the Jew just so you know that’s that’s so ridiculous not only just on its face but we’re forbidden from even having meat that has any blood in it this is a Torah law you can’t have that’s why you know we can’t have Stak tar okay so this gets perpetuated in combination with a fourth Century what’s called The Vulgate I’m

05:28

sorry did you say in 1140 this happened 1144 in Norwich England okay this is after in the 4th Century you have something called The Vulgate The Vulgate is the official translation of the Bible in Hebrew there’s no vows and and the person who translates St who translates The Vulgate knows what he’s doing is translating wrong he puts down that when Moses comes down from Mount Si he has horns okay Karen when actually the word was Karan meaning that light Shone from his head so now by 11:44 you have the

06:01

anti-semitic myth of Jews have horns and they drink blood and I know people who’ve been asked when they went into the army and other places can I see your hor so this still exists today in 2024 throughout America and I don’t mean just in little rural areas it exists today these myths that Vulgate Bible is the official Catholic Bible all the way through the 1970 so it is you need to understand that that’s a piece of it okay that that that they’re equated with with this kind of hate in because it’s about Jews not having

06:38

the right to exist collectively when they live in their little communities in the Middle Ages anti-Semitism is a hate against their religion by the time you get to the 18th and 20th centuries when so many Jews have assimilated they are in culture they are in arts they’re in science it’s no longer against them for their religion it’s against them for their race this anti-Semitism is the oldest hate in the world and the hate that mutates in 1948 because remember as Lord sax I just want to pause it you said

07:12

it’s a hate that mutates correct so your belief then is that the definition of anti-semitism can necessarily change is that correct it’s not just my belief it is the commonly accepted understanding in both the Jewish and academic worlds okay this isn’t okay as I said that’s why I quoted this is a quote it’s a great thing from Lord saak uh you know Jonathan Sachs it’s a great thing from Nia this this is just accepted as understanding of you know a cult I would just say off the bat I do

07:45

not accept that definitions can just mutate that is something that I could debate that on like the definition of a woman I mean and I’m saying not just about Jewish people I think that we have to have a concrete definition to work with because then you can just update and say actually I’ve changed that and now is what constitutes anti-Semitism but Candace that is the horror of anti-Semitism so what you are saying to me is that anti-Semitism is this and does not change what I am saying to you is that the entire world and Scholars

08:18

about anti-Semitism recognize that it is a unique hate that if you define it as the the the that that you should not be able to exist collectively okay as a collective they shouldn’t have that right that changes from the Middle Ages with religion the 18th through 20th centuries about race and then after Israel is created it’s a hatred based on the nation and until that’s ex until that is understood that that that it is this isn’t something that’s really questioned about among academics theologians Jewish

08:59

Scholars I’m not presenting it this is why I thought I’m so optimistic about a dialogue but I think part of it is you view that the hate can’t mutate and what I’m trying to tell you is that we have 2000s years of history that demonstrate the exact opposite so I’m GNA just push back very just gently here for me personally if I thought that racism could just be an Ever shifting uh definition based on the experience of black people it would be a remarkable power and I would be able to create

09:32

something like BLM which could say that everything was racist so I am not going to be able to agree that definition should be able to transform according to what’s happening during the day but here’s what I will say if you could just because I think it’s really important um for us to get to going through this article because then you might be able to explain why you vo as anti-Semitism if you could just give us what you are saying the current definition of anti-semitism is today that would be very helpful current definition of

10:04

anti-semitism today has to do with What feelings are it has to do with anti- Zionism number one that is a definition anti-zionism anti-israel is anti-Semitism okay this is so you believe that Jewish people can be anti-semitic absolutely okay so so when you see a gathering of Jewish people who say you know I’m Jewish but I don’t support Israel or BB Netanyahu you say that person’s that person can be anti-semitic you just did two different things and was very uh you just did two thing two different things that were totally unrelated cany

10:45

okay you said that you said that Jews that do not support Israel yes and you said Jews that do not support BB netan I’m just saying that because he’s the current prime minister so I’m saying like if they if they say I don’t support this is this is where you’re missing the point so I’m going to go under the following premise okay I’m going to go under the premise that you care about people you and I don’t know each other but I’m going to go under that premise I’m going to go under the premise that

11:11

you have no desire to ever hurt anyone okay that’s the premise I’m coming into this dialogue with you have been devastatingly hurtful and I and and I think that that that I’m going to go from that you don’t understand what means to the Jewish world there’s a great teaching that that comes out of every sociologist every person in in academics is that I don’t get to tell a black man if he’s experiencing racism he knows I don’t get to tell you if you’re experiencing misogyny you know if I make a comment

11:51

and it’s misogynistic and you say Rabbi you know that was really misogynistic my job is to say wow I didn’t mean that I apologize that’s not what I meant and you you and do not get the right to say what is anti-Semitic or Jew hatred I’m sorry I’m not trying to to I didn’t I don’t think I said anything about me having the right I just said to you would you then view because I I did host somebody who is Jewish Dave Smith on my show I’m sure you’re familiar with him he’s a comedian he’s a Libertarian

12:23

he is not pro Zionist so I’m just asking you for clarity because you’re saying that you can’t dismiss a Jewish person but aren’t you thereby missing Jewish people who say that I don’t support Israel as a state I’m just trying to to have you answer that question I will ask you back the same question are there blacks who are do not support blacks are there pick the cause or the minority who do not support or not or or actually even better you and I both sit on the conservative side politic we share that right um and we

12:56

Face the same way when it comes to that and we both I think are disappointed in those who Republicans the name over correct yes okay does that mean they’re not Republicans well I wouldn’t describe a race as a political IDE like a political party that’s very different so to say that you can’t be a race like you’re not black if you don’t support this is different than like you’re basically saying that a Jewish person can be anti-semitic so that would be like saying a black person can in fact

13:27

be racist um towards or or or they’re not black look I’m not going to comment on black com Community I will say there are plenty of self-hating Jews okay so you do believe that’s all I was trying to get you to say is that Jewish people who don’t support Israel you are saying they are anti-semitic I just want to understand that I’m saying it very clearly they are self-hating Jews let’s use that term very specifically and you need to understand why they are self-hating Jews and you need to

13:53

understand as as numerous people have talked about I’ve written about Greer’s talked about gorka’s talked Lin’s talked about a number of people have talked about um Shapiro’s talked about as I say I’ve written about is that a a people want to assimilate for 2,000 years J been persecuted and so they want to assimilate and so many have converted from Judaism not to another religion but to leftist politics that becomes their religion and they lose their identity that is a reality so you need to

14:27

understand or I shouldn’t say you need to that’s not fair apologize I hope I would hope that you understand a history and an understanding that we Define what anti-Semitism is and what happened on October 7th what happened on October 7th and I wrote an article about you on no in November I don’t know if you read it or not I was told you have but I don’t know if you did or not I did not okay I wish you had had and I I really wish we had because we might be in a very different place you want to talk with

15:07

Carlson after this is November and okay go ahead I’m gonna say I want to talk about that because you put that in your you put that in this article which was published just last week so so I wrote a very specific article and you can you can find it right now and it was an imp personal invitation to you and for you that everything else I had read or seen or heard that my belief and my hope is that your your comment of wanting to have an academics discussion about October 7th came from a place of not really realizing what October 7th was October

15:50

7th is unique and recorded human history as the ugliest day of humanity what was done on October 7th taking a young woman taking her phone to videotape her being raped on the corpse of her dead boyfriend and then shot on it and sending that video to her parents beheading a man with a garden ho kicking a woman until her body parts follow is is unique in terms of the intention to attack civilians and so in November after you made the comment on Tucker Carlson about wanting an academic discussion about how you know those kind

16:34

of comments that you made and the onway that you that you demonstrate I wrot an article saying that I would arrange for you there’s a a film 47 minute film by the IDF it is based it is not basic it is all the footage done by Hamas terrorists of what they were doing so proudly what they wanted to do and that my belief was I don’t think that you quite realize that and I would arrange for private screening you and your friends and that I would arrange that and then have the discussion about how you feel about October 7 okay so I just

17:08

really would like to get to your article because I think it’s important I want to acknowledge your pain about October 7th uh you are that’s not an opinion that’s not an opin no I didn’t say opinion I said I want to acknowledge your pain about I apologize I apologize I op I apologize I didn’t say that I said I want to acknowledge your pain about October 7th and I want to get to that because you are yeah you’re mischaracterizing I said on Tucker Carlson but I do have the clip and we’re going to be able to to watch

17:32

it I definitely did not say I wanted to have an academic debate about October 7th that’s not what I all um but I like I said I have the clip uh and I do also want I think it’s it’s best for us to dive into what what you actually wrote about me because there are several mischaracterizations I believe of what I said but both of us are going to be able to watch it um so again this this is the article and and by the way you did say in this article that you heard that I received your invitation that is false I

18:05

think it’s important to just maybe name the people who told you that I received your invitation no I’d rather not do that especially since you’re saying that it’s incorrect and in which case I apologize no you can apologize I just think that like a lot of the reason that things happen is because there is this sort of back channeling and discussion and nobody told me that I got an invitation and now you’ve written that I refused an invitation and so that adds to people believing so Candace I’m going

18:30

to ask you a question right now I’m inviting you forget about the article because I have no issue and would love to write an article saying I was wrong Candace Owens does not feel that way I would love that so I’m inviting you right now I will set up a screening for you will you come if you set up a screening for me after we go through this I just I just I want to also be able to estimate your character by going through some of the things that you wrote you did write some things that I believe wait wait wait I’m asking a yes

18:58

or no question and just said to you I I’m going to give you an answer to that but I want to First go through your article because I want to be able to estimate wa what I’m asking you a question I will take the entire article I am I am not I’m not saying I’m not going to answer your question I am just saying that I would like to go through this see how you you said you haden’t had an invitation I’m asking you I don’t have to be there I’ll set it up for you okay sure if you want to set it up for me to

19:24

have a screening of that here without you there that’s fine what I’m saying is that I would not i i i based on what you wrote about me I wouldn’t take an in I wouldn’t take an invitation from you anywhere I think that’s fair given what’s in this article I think that’s a normal human response that if somebody has written somebody something that is utterly liess about you it mischaracterizes what you said but if you want to set it up separately and you want to send it to the Daily wire and

19:49

you want us to have a private screening I absolutely will watch the events of October 7th I that’s you know what God bless you and had I ever heard you say that I wouldn’t have written an article well I think you still would have because you made a lot of points in here um no no I wouldn’t have no I wouldn’t have because I believe in the idea that it’s about what we act and learn and and we have a concept called shba introduce them no actually honestly had you said there had at any point what you just now

20:16

said to me that you would watch a screening I don’t need to be there that you would watch a screening um if I set it up I would not have written that article okay well I do still want to go through points though because you you do you hear that please yes I hear that and thank you for saying that but a lot of what you wrote in this article is a lot of what I’m assuming you have a friendly relationship with Rabbi Shuli has been saying about me so it’s really important to go through these points because when you write

20:42

something like is a Jew hating bigot that’s very strong language and we we need to go through these points so so we go through all of them sure yes thank you okay just let’s just speak in here so you you basically make the argument that I’m that I’m drunk on Fame and that that is the reason why I have let out the truth about who I am which makes me a Jew hater first thing you say is that this is a woman who is such an anti-s semi and so ignorant of history that in 2018 she publicly said that Hitler was

21:14

okay do you actually believe that I publicly said that Hitler was okay so from the recording that I heard including the Congressional testimony which I think was taken out of context and from the comments that you said okay if I and you correct if I’m wrong but my understanding from your comments is you were asked a question about nationalism and you responded about nationalism using the example that nationalism was good and that what Hitler did Hitler was nationalistic in Germany and that was okay you have said

21:50

specifically you think Hitler is a horrible etc etc etc and you have condemned Hitler thank god without question and you also brought him up in that discussion about nationalist is that all accurate so when you just write she publicly said Hitler was okay that is dishonest because what I actually was saying was answering a question as you brought up where we were not even talking about Jews not talking about the Holocaust a woman was asking about whether or not it’s okay for people today to say that they’re nationalist

22:23

when it’s often Associated as a dirty word and what I was saying was that it’s wrongly assoc with Hitler I don’t believe that Hitler was a nationalist because obviously Hitler invaded Poland he obviously had Ambitions outside of so what we have the clip we have the clip so we’re gonna play it so again the question that’s being asked of me is whether or not nationalism is nationalism is an okay word to embrace let’s play the clip so we can hear me and what I actually said absolutely yeah I agree I I actually

22:54

don’t have any problems at all with the word nationalism I think that it gets uh the definition gets poisoned um by elitist that actually want globalism globalism is what I what I don’t want so when you think about whenever we say nationalism the first thing people think about in at least in America is Hitler you know he was a national socialist but if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well okay fine the problem is is that he wanted he had dreams outside of Germany he wanted to

23:21

globalize he wanted everybody to be German everybody to be speaking German everybody to look a different way that’s not to me that’s not nationalism so again we’re trying there to Define nationalism does your statement she publicly said that Hitler was okay is that an honest statement yeah so let’s let’s talk about this for a moment is that okay yeah um you were asked a question about nationalism you responded with an example of Adolf Hitler yes I said because Americans associate the reason

23:56

why they think it’s a dirty word is because of Adolf Hitler you resp and you have subsequently and I’ve seen you subsequently and I think you even said it in the Congressional appearing you have obviously condemned him for who he was um but you brought Hitler’s name into a discussion correct and you justifi that this is how America feels or how people feel and that’s your take on it it’s not necessarily accurate and in fact it probably isn’t from a from an actual sociological standpoint but

24:33

that’s your opinion fine but Candice you you put in the same sentence what he did if it just had stayed in Germany was okay but more importantly and here’s a piece of the anti-Semitism why bring one of the most evil men of history into the discussion you could just as easily have given any negative examples of nationalism you chose to bring Hitler up not them I did and I I have no I’m I I if I could go backwards in the context of trying to understand why Americans think that nationalism is a bad word it

25:23

was appropriate for me to bring off Adolf Hitler it is totally appropriate in any capacity when you are talking about history and historical sentiments to bring up any relevant character that has created those sentiments so are I just want to again I just want to yes or no after watching that in we I I I want to make sure we don’t run out time here after watching that in context do you think it is fair that you wrote She publicly said that Hitler was okay Hitler was okay yes by bringing me even into the conversation yes I do okay

25:55

great let’s move on here um because I again this discussion we’re having between us but I I I want the public to be able to you know to do what’s fair and what’s not fair you then wrote this statement a mere month after the horrors of babies being beheaded women being raped and the sleo of Horrors from Hamas Owens went on Tucker Carlson’s show to speak about how it really wasn’t that bad and why should she even care after all she seems to think that Hitler was okay so what’s the problem is that true

26:25

that I went on Tucker Carlson’s show and said that October 7th really wasn’t that bad um yeah actually it did and you did it through the implications the words and and I actually do know where some of those clips are because I’ve rewatched it multiple times and you specifically say you want to have an academic discussion you specifically say um I don’t want to misquote you that you have a you have a you believe you have a moderate stance okay because you see the children dying and on both sides and you

26:58

talk about um the pain and I think you do feel pain about Gaza um and this goes back to the anti-Semitism canas what happened October 7th is unique it is to to even make a moral equivalency this is one of the keys in anti-Semitism and in any Prejudice and bigotry is that an inappropriate moral equivalency is cre when someone says that this race these people whomever are like dogs they’ve made a moral equivalency between those people and dogs that is bigotry that is hat so I just I first want to debunk the idea that I first want to debunk the

27:43

idea that I did not like I in any way said it really wasn’t that bad that statement never came out of my mouth and I also want to show that actually contrary to that I I condemned I condemned what Hamas did so let’s just show that clip of what I said and then I want to get to your quotation about academic discussion let’s just show what I said about Hamas I have seen every single person including myself condemn what happened on October 7th I have because who wouldn’t condemn terrorism it’s OB who

28:10

would not condemn innocent Israelis dying but if you then say that it is also sad when an innocent Palestinian child dies suddenly this is pramas or you need to say even when you’re talking about how sad it is that a child dies you need to button that statement by saying but that child was a human shield that’s not going to be my response um first off as a mother as not going to be my response as somebody who is about to do to give birth when I see these images of children involved on both sides of the conflict I’ve pointed to the the

28:37

people that are mocking dead Israeli children and said that they are horrific I am even Keel on this matter and yet people think that you need to be extreme so people that have become more radical and extreme are perceiving a moderate stance as not enough and I was don’t people can disagree with you or agree with you or whatever but you certainly don’t seem radical on this topic and I’m going to hold here before you comment on that because your next sentence as you just said she wanted to talk about the

29:02

depravities of Hamas as an academic discussion and refused to even condemn Hamas so we just saw that I did condemn Hamas um and regarding the academic discussion I’m sorry no you made a moral equivalency between Hamas and Gaza I didn’t do that there is no moral equivalency what Hamas did is evil it is not a tragedy only it is evil I’m sorry Candace but you make an equivalency that does not exist in most people’s mind and certainly in no Jews L okay so I’m glad that you said that so people can hear

29:31

what I actually said and hear what you are saying and how you are taking it I don’t know how you could write this statement she refused to condemn Hamas when I literally said who would not condemn these horri events you don’t condemn them uniquely evil you put them in parap puru relationship you’re saying that you’re saying that even though I did so now you’re admitting that I did condemn Hamas even though she refused to what condemnation is is this where you really want to go is have an English

29:58

discussion you no no no you wrote she refused to condemn Hamas these are your words because when you put that at the moment you say that they have a moral equivalency with anything else that’s not condemnation no matter I said I said it is it’s sad when an innocent it’s not condemnation and just ask you question is it sad is it sad sit there do that I don’t want cut each other off okay because clearly what we are having here is just a disagreement there’s no reason to get angry do you think do you think

30:27

it is sad when an innocent Palestinian child dies Candice I cry every day and it’s not just for Israel and this is one of the things you clearly do not understand the same way most don’t who are anti-em who don’t get it I cry for what’s going on in Israel I cry just as much for what we are forced to do golden Mayer had a great quote she said that one day we may be able to forgive them for killing Israeli children we will never be able to forgive them for making them making us kill their children what about my statement of

31:14

saying that I also cry for Palestinian children is wrong to you if you also admit it is sad when Palestinian children die it’s painful but it is not in any way shape or form morally equivalent to O October 7th that is the anti-semitic bigotry I didn’t say that I just want to be clear people are watching it’s it’s just not what came out of my mouth but I’m not goingon I don’t want I don’t want to get hung up I don’t want to get hung up on that I want to I want to now point to um you said I

31:42

wanted to talk about the depravities I’m going to quote it she wanted to talk about the deivi of Hamas as an academic discussion actually I was talking about NATO and here is the clip of what I said when I use the words academic discussion take a listen I mean you can go back to me even talking about Native expansion before things erupted between Russia and Ukraine and and having a meaningful discussion about how much expansion is too much expansion how would we feel if we had troops on our border these are

32:09

things that should be allowed in an academic discussion you should be able to sit on stage and should be able to debate these ideas without using OD homant attacks you’re using it in the reference Candice in the dialogue about October 7 you’re using your discussions of NATO as an analogy in an analogous way about how we should able to discuss October 7th from a foreign okay so you think that it is fair after listening to that me talking about NATO and me talking about Russia and Ukraine and saying that we should

32:40

always be able to have an academic discussion about foreign policy you think your statement still is fair saying that she wanted to talk about the depravities of Hamas as an academic discussion because you’re using that context and you’re the one taking your own quotes out of context I played it I didn’t take it out of cont I just played it then play the whole paragraph We were talking before that the entire issue I did so the first part was what I just showed you that was actually a split clip the first part the first half

33:06

of that was when you that the one that we just showed you when you said that I said it really wasn’t that bad and why should she even care the first part I say I condemn Hamas and then I said that my I’ve been consistent in always saying that we should have a topic we should be able to discuss foreign policy removed from ad homant attacks because that is the truth and that’s how I feel but to be clear broke out academic discussion because I was referring Candace okay I’m going to ask you I’m going to ask you really

33:34

simple questions okay no no no no I I I want to keep going through this I think it’s important it’s about this so I’m gonna ask you a simple question do you ever mean to hurt people because they race religion or color ever do I ever mean to hurt people say that because of because they’re race religion or color ever I can’t hear the last part I don’t know why I’m I’m not here I’m Sor apologize we know about the techn do you ever intend to hurt or want to hurt anyone based on their race religion

34:06

theology color Etc no never not once all right what you need to hear is your statement I’m not alone in this because it is the whole context of October 7th it’s hurtful to chws okay and I want to give you and I’d like to give you an analogy that I think that might really help our dialogue if that’s okay a number of years ago a movie came out called The Passion of the Christ did you did you see the movie yes it’s a wonderful movie okay and um I saw the movie as well I saw it the opening day

34:47

and saw it twice and I arranged for a screening of priest students Minister students Rabbi students rabbis ministers and Priests loyal La met when I was Professor okay I realized something in watching that movie there are two movies going on if you accept Jesus as your savior then that movie is so brilliant and so painful about his suffering that it it trans it it it transcends everything else and that’s all you see and I think you just said it was a brilliant movie and and as many my friends did Loyola Etc I think it was a

35:25

brilliant movie too was one that if you don’t accept Jesus as your savior you’re not so emotionally attached to all the suffering that gibes and portrays so well and so what you do notice as an example is are all the anti-semitic things so I had a discussion with a woman who’s the senior vice president of lyola when the movie came out she said Rabbi there’s no anti-Semitism and so actually I’ll give you an example of one scene there’s a scene of little Jewish kids who chase Jews Judas and they morph into demons

36:00

and they’re wearing modern 20th century yamakas and they have classic Jewish AR stereotypical faces they morph to demons and with modern Yus it’s that that Trope of Jews as demons and Lany said to me I don’t remember that scene and I realized in that moment she was so emotionally involved in the suffering of Jesus she didn’t notice the anti-Semitism but both are true in the movie you may not have the desire to have that pain in your heart but what I’m trying to tell you is by having a conversation with Tucker

36:40

Carlson Under the Umbrella of October 7 which is what that segment was about and saying that you have a moderate stance that there should be able to be discussion like just like there is in about Native it validates the reality of the absolute evil that is unique to October 7 had you asked me on October 6th what to do with Hamas despite that in their Covenant of 1988 their Charter which I don’t if you read despite the fact that in article 71 and 13 they call for the destruction of all Jews M if you’d ask me on October 6

37:17

I would say we should do whatever we should do for peace what they did on o October 7th was surrender their human Souls they became AMC if you’re familiar with the character the Bible and what they did is so evil it cannot be compared to anything else just like what Hitler did is so evil no one should compare I don’t care if it’s Trump or Obama no one should compare any political leader today to him you did it under a guys whether you meant to or not it was anti-semitic against okay so I just don’t I’m just going to be honest

37:52

with you I don’t accept that characterization so what I’m doing now is I’m allowing you to say what you believe and showing the clips not removed from their context and we have to just allow you know people to take from this discussion what they can if you’re like most Americans you’re struggling to make ends meet everything is more expensive these days by the time you pay the bills fill up your car and go grocery shopping there’s almost nothing left you’re laying out your credit card for all non-essentials or

38:16

maybe even some Essentials last I checked the average credit card interest rate for Americans is sitting at 24% that is insane how are you supposed to dig yourself out of all that debt if you own home I want you to call my friends at American financing right now interest rates have finally dropped into the fives which is the lowest they’ve been in a long time call American Finance and to talk about their refinance options they save their customers on average $854 a month by tapping into their home equity and wiping out High interest

38:46

credit card debt think about it $854 a month is like a $10,000 raise what a relief that could be for you and your family don’t wait to take control of your finances these rates might not last long act today call American financing at 800 795121 0 and if you call today you may not have to make next month’s mortgage payment that’s 800 795121 0 or visit American financing.

39:15

net nmls 182 334 nmls consumer access.org APR for rates in the five start at 6.79% for well-qualified borrowers call 800 7951 1210 for details about credit costs and terms now I do want to move on though because then the next sentence almost appears to me to be the inversion of what actually happened you write she castigated Ben Shapiro for being passionately pro-israel I couldn’t find a clip on that uh so I just wanted to ask you what you were referring to because actually what happened was Ben insulted me publicly I have not insulted

39:51

Ben publicly so I’m just wondering where that sentence where we can look for castigating Ben sh being I try find that’s number one number two just of your head where where where I was when I castigated him what where I was when I disrespected him Candace I I will be happy to go try and find you things about I’m sure Ben can find him as well I’m sure other people can I want to make something real clear about this though I don’t think that there is a place for any of the kind of dialogue especially between people who are the

40:25

same conservatives who are on the same side I don’t think there’s a place to personally insult anyone and that comes from both sides I don’t think it’s okay for anyone to insult you or your family I don’t think it’s okay for you to insult anyone or their fam I call you an anti-semite because I that is how I judge what the way you act and what you said okay I’m very pleased I’m very pleased that you’ve agreed to watch the documentary makes me very happy and you can comment on it after you’ve watched it makes me

40:58

really happy honestly and I think that and hope that after you see that you have a whole different understanding but I don’t think it’s okay for anyone to say make personal attacks now when Ben Shapiro calls you an anti-semite I call you an anti-semite I only wish goodness on your soul but that is how you act okay that’s very different than calling you a Fillin the blank prority okay but you did write she castigated Ben Shapiro for being pro-israel so I’m just asking you happy to find happy to

41:35

find the exact quotes for happy to find I because never it just never happened I would never okay you’re saying that I’m happy to find okay but he did he did insult me but I did not insult Ben so that that was very interesting because I was like that’s almost an inversion of what happened here well okay Candace he says something differently I think but I will I will find and give you I’m happy to let Skyler know a a place in that and only in that specific interview by the way in oh in that interview we’re

42:04

talking about that interview that’s why I was asking you what interview tuck me and Tucker talking about Ben you’re say that I C him for being pro Israel K I’m happy I’ll say it again I’m happy to find those spaces where you castigated him and send them to Skyler and and you can decide to share them with your audience or not put it in right right in here if there’s a example of a clip of me doing that um because actually I abstained from doing that and told Tucker that it’s not something that

42:35

I would do um okay then you go on to talk about me attacking Rabbi schi my audience has already seen him attacking me over the last two years um and I’m just going to ask you a basic question does a black person or any person have a right to defend themselves absolutely okay because that is Rob sh and his daughter have attacked me and made videos of me for two years straight I have responded once and you have now you’re basically saying that I’m anti-semitic for responding so I’m just I want your your perception of when

43:10

it is that a black person is allowed to respond so first of all I know schie peripherally we’ve probably met a half a dozen times okay he is an incredibly knowledgeable man he formed L Society in Oxford incredibly knowledgeable man um and with nine kids right and we have something in Judaism preas Christianity but it’s also Christianity as well to an extent called L the evil tongue that to gossip to uh to say certain things like that are are is is really a huge AA it’s a huge sin I don’t know all the things that he

43:50

has said about you I do know he’s called you an anti-semite and so have I that’s not a personal attack on you and your family for you to call a man who is extremely knowledgeable an Unholy Rabbi and his hag daughter forgetting about what he may or may not have done if he’s attacked you personally if he’s said whatever horrific things about you personally that you are a blankly blankly blankly blankly blank he’s wrong of of if he’s attacked you or your children or your family you’re mother

44:29

um for you to rather than comment on whatever he’s done to call him an Unholy Rabbi that is way out of line you don’t even know what a rabbi is supposed to do so let me ask you question do you view that as anti-semitic for me to respond so it’s anti okay so he can attack me for two years is he a racist just to be clear I don’t know he he attacks you so I can’t so what if I say that the definition of racism changes and if you attack a black person uh you’re a racist cace you don’t

45:00

get to get away with that depends howang because at the beginning of this discussion you did say that you can’t tell a black it’s been I two years consistently of him him and his daughter attacking me tell saying that I wasn’t there I’m asking you I’m asking all okay but if you’re saying that you weren’t there why would you put this into rri is isn’t it coming upon you to research what’s happened before you you start saying to me that defending myself is anti-Semitic cand cand

45:28

if he attacked you personally if he said you were a black filling the blame then he should be reprimanded that but it doesn’t justify what you did you don’t know what a rabbi does you don’t know our theology how dare you call him an Unholy Rabbi how dare you go into the misogynistic excuse me the the the anti-semitic Trope of his had daughter something used throughout the late 18th and and early uh through the early 20th century sorry sorry hag is now anti-semitic that is a term of his hag daughter that goes back into the witches

46:04

of of of Eastern Europe why did you have to call her a hag daughter to be clear because she’s a witch I think she’s a witch that’s not because she’s Jewish I would call I would call someone a hag of any color I think she’s a witch what they have done over the last two years I believe his daughter is a hag I said that because that’s what I believe you may disagree with me on that but to to say that that’s anti-semitic is ridiculous I would call any a Candace Candace um I’m gon to be very clear without trying to be

46:36

insulting so please forgive me if it comes off wrong okay it’s not meal it’s fine you can insult me I don’t want to I’ve dealt with two years of a rabbi insulting me so I’m I’m I’m totally with this yeah I have no desire to insult anybody okay but do you understand are you familiar with the history of the fairy tales and the folk tales of Eastern Europe I I know that we can I know that we can go back and we can also say no no no no no I’m asking a specific question that the which archetype of those fairy

47:10

tales were specifically modeled and called the Jews that the Jews of that part of the world were called hags and witches specifically because they didn’t eat the same food they had different practices and they were excluded that way as part of the bloodline so you are saying that we by calling a rabbi’s daughter her a witch a had daughter you have tapped into an anti-semitic Trope that goes about hundreds of years whether you mean to or not okay now now that I told you that yeah okay do you think maybe there are better words to

47:41

call her than a hag daughter I’m actually not going to edit my language for two people that have been attacking me for two years and so what I’m going to say is is that what I’m going to say is that and I’m I want to be very strong on this I am not going to be told whether you want to dress it up as anti-Semitism you want to dress it up this or that that I cannot respond and defend myself I’m certainly not going to be told that I need to be contained in how I respond after two years of consistent attacks from two individuals

48:10

so I I want to just say on that point you and I will never come to an agreement I stand by everything that I said about him and I’m not going to have that everything that I say including yesterday when he says that me finding his the products and stuff that he sells and promotes as a Rabbi to be Unholy to say that I am only saying that because it’s made in Israel it’s poly ridiculous but what it looks like to a lot of people and I’m going to tell you this and I’m expressing this in case you are

48:37

an individual as I’m sure you are that is concerned about the rise of anti-Semitism but my suspicion is that people that are watching this are going to think that now we are using the word anti-Semitism like BLM began using racism right which is to say that you cannot let me finish my statement I’m just telling you what I am going this is my suspicion I have tons of Jewish listeners but given what you’ve said about Dave Smith who is a Libertarian he is not a far-left liberal he just does not support what Israel is doing so in

49:05

this you have said that Jewish people you you’ve made comments about a lot of Jewish people who maybe don’t agree with what’s happening in Israel you are now saying that a person who’s being attacked for two years still needs to be careful on how they approach a Jewish person that’s been doing the attacking no one is going to accept that that’s that’s ridiculous and then to say this particular word it sounds like everything that anybody says needs to First need to weigh against the

49:29

feelings of somebody and their history you I could find examples of black people being called witches I can’t then say that nobody can ever call a black person a witch you know even if it has what happened in Salem you could you could go on and on right but the point is that if you are a black person you’ve been attacking two years I don’t care if person calls him a rabbi in fact I would question what it means to be a rabbi maybe you can explain if you have been consistently attacking and threatening

49:53

somebody literally he gave a quote to the Jerusalem Post which actually I like the Jerusalem Post they report on things very accurately in which he says that he wants to bankrupt Candace Owens that is a direct threat to somebody’s livelihood it is Despicable and because you call yourself a rabbi it does not mean that people cannot say but it is poly ridiculous that you are using finances as a mode of threat against people because you don’t like their speech it is ridiculous and let me tell you what that leans into an anti-semitic Trope

50:22

about Jewish people and money for a rabbi to stand up and say let’s bankrupt her all day you can scream I’ve let you talk a lot that’s not that’s not fair I’ve let you talk a lot kace it’s your show you’re going to edit and say what you want I’m not gonna edit this whatsoever I promise you okay great terrific I appreciate that no one has if someone is attacking you you can defend yourself and and if someone is saying a bad thing about you I would even go and defend you as well

50:53

for them saying that she’s a black such and such she’s a female such and such she’s whatever may be if he’s attacking you and again I’m not privy to those two years of of attacks that you’ve had but the moment you start saying things like an Unholy Rabbi when you do not know a rabbi’s job and you don’t know Judaism you don’t know what is considered kadosh what is considered holy or not holy Jews when the moment you make those kind of comments you’ve crossed a line and

51:24

you didn’t need to make them I get you’re angry I get you feel violated by I get you feel he that he attacks you unjustifiably I haven’t been part of the discussions so I he may have but that doesn’t ever give you then the right to say what you said and it demonstrates again a pattern of behavior of a of an unawareness that you have about Jewish theology a lack of awareness you have about Jewish history and about anti-Semitism the fact that you can’t accept what all academics what the I shouldn’t say all because

52:01

everything all but what academics what Lord sacks with theologians all accept about that anti-Semitism is the unique ha that mutates what Prager has done at Prager you video on the fact that you can’t even accept that is in itself problematic I I just I I think that it’s to understand that you have discern you have decided that you Candace Owens are more knowledgeable wise and you made brilliant in a lot of feeli that’s not that’s not what I’ve said that’s not I’ve never said these

52:35

things I didn’t say I was more wife I just said call his daughter a hag and I meant it I’m not taking the words back that’s what I’ve said the fact that you can’t accept that the definition of anti-semitism that you think you know the definition better than Scholars academics Jewish theologians better than rabbis is a level of humous as I say you may know all sorts of things about all sorts of topics but you’re now dancing in a field where Shiro dances I dance where uh Rabbi schi you know and and and I’m

53:13

trying to tell you that you were repeatedly doing anti-semitic Behavior but your underlying premise that you said at the beginning of our dialogue was that you don’t accept that definition of anti-semitism what I said is I don’t accept the definitions mutate is what I said to you beginning of this dialogue and I’m telling that’s the definition of anti-semitism you have now said that you know more than Lord Jonathan sax so I believe I’m gonna guess actually knew your father-in-law because it’s not that big of a world

53:39

there and you can ask anyone about Lord sex you are now saying that you don’t accept the definition well okay what I’m saying to you is that there’s debate even amongst Jewish people about the definition of anti-semitism as I pointed to you no that’s a pretty much accepted one if you’re saying the definition mutates and you’re saying it has no definition right it has definition comes from the word Define if it has definition it has a shape right you can’t say the shape can mutate the

54:06

square can become a circle can become a triangle it that means that it has no shape you’re talking about an amoeba say it again it mutates because the definition again I’m using I’m quoting Lord sax directly quoted him where he says that Jews have this is his definition it’s pretty much accepted Jews have no right to exist collectively as Jews with the same rights as other human beings sounds like a definition and the reason that it mutates how that becomes manifest is because in the Middle Ages it’s about

54:37

religion when they come out of the Shettles when they go into the Cosmopolitan areas and in the 18th through 27th or 20th century excuse me that hate M has now manifested and mutated so it’s not about religion it’s about race just so I’m clear did more sa say it mutates or are you saying it mutates I’m sorry I couldn’t hear AP did Lord saxs say it mutates or are he says it mutates correct can you can you just resay the quotation his direct quotation that it is a hate that mutates it is a hate that mut virus he

55:11

calls it that mutates and that he’s not alone in that and then by the time you get to the 20th century it now has mutated to be anti- the nation so the hate manifests as first religion then as race and now as Nation so would you say say that anybody who takes issue with anything that Israel does is an anti-semite of course not that’s less okay because a ludicrous State okay because then why are that’s a ludicrous okay I’m glad you said that because earlier when we were talking about Dave Smith and I said that

55:46

some Jewish people don’t agree with what Israel is doing as a nation you suggested that they were self-hating Jews that’s not what I suggested what I said is there’s a very difference between supporting Israel and supporting bb or the government there’s a huge difference support of Israel is to understand and and I think again this is a place Eugene Bishop who was one of the heads of the central Conference of American Bishops great Catholic leader um said a number of things and monor mon Senor Royal

56:17

Vatican of blessed memory I actually heard him say this uh Royal said he was one of the first people to do Interfaith dialogue after Vatican 2 and Royal said the following he said that no non-jew can ever fully understand the relationship between the Jewish people and the land of Israel in the same way that no Jew can understand how a bunch of old Bishops excuse me old Cardinals go into a building white smoke comes out and some of one suddenly one of them is inal it’s a quote from Royal Vatican blessed Member One of the founders of

56:47

interfaith dialogue the 6070s what I’m trying to explain to you is our tie to Israel that one when you make an anti-zionist not just you when anyone makes a com an anti-zionist comment that is anti-Semitism well when you say anti- Zionist when you say anti-zionist you don’t mean criticizing Israel’s government just no you can criticize govern okay so I’m just not but criticize it okay but there’s let’s go can we follow that path for a moment because I think this might get us somewhere as I said from the beginning

57:23

I’m optimistic I’d like to get somewhere to criticize Israel’s government is one thing I want to do that great um that’s you want to especially you want to criticize America’s involvement relationship with Israel You’re an American citizen support that but understanding have you ever read the Covenant of 1988 for Hamas no I have not read the Covenant of 1988 for Hamas so let me tell you about Hamas in their Charter which you can find easily online the Covenant of 1988 um they claim that they are a the

58:03

the subsidiary for the region of the Muslim brother which I’m sure you know a lot about or you learn a lot and they call for the obliteration of all Jews they um say in article 7 that the Muslim day of judgment will not come until every Jew is killed and those few who still live Hide between exp this is a quote between the Rocks behind excuse me behind the rocks and the trees and the trees call out o Abdullah Muslim there’s a Jew hiding behind me come kill me the definition of a Palestine which there is no historical

58:42

Palestine the definition of a Palestine from the river to the sea from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea means no Israel it is as lord saxs said it is that don’t have a right to live collectively in a nation and so when to it’s one thing to say I don’t agree with what the government’s doing it’s an entire other thing to create a moral equivalency which you keep doing inappropriate a moral equivalency between anything Israel does and what happened October 7th there is no equivalency Israel’s not going out to go

59:24

out and try to to take go into to Arab homes and to take and torture a child in front of the parents and then kill the child and kill the parents Israel doesn’t do that Israel is most ethical Army in the na I I think we might be having a fundamental disagreement on what moral equivalency is and I tend to agree with Dave Smith that actually what moral equivalency is is saying that irrespective of anything we are going to judge these people the same that would be morally equivalent right but we don’t need to go into that

59:56

because I didn’t do any of that and I I just totally disagree with how you’ve characterized my discussion with Su Carlson at all because like I said I clearly said I didn’t end what Hamas did and then I said that it’s sad when a Palestinian child dies and then you agreed that it’s sad when a Palestinian child dies so I don’t understand why these two statements seem to you to be trying to morally equate anything I just making two stat minutes and 20 seconds into your video you make the comment

1:00:20

about of being I believe that’s the time place you make the comment that you have moderate stance and everything else is extremist and what I’m trying to explain to you is that once and I hope once you see the idea of film we can have another dialogue well no I’m I’m just saying that I do think that when anything you know horrific happens it turns a lot of people into extremists overnight and they become very extreme in their language you have you have judged you you have you you not you’ve not you’ve

1:00:48

not let me finish my statement okay I’ve let you talk very much what I have said is that when anything happens what tends to H what tends to happen after that is people become very extreme in their rhetoric and actually there is a really good example is it Joel over at breart who wrote something very extreme following October 7th online and then a couple days later he wrote a long paragraph apologizing and saying why he was emotional why his rhetoric was extreme and what he actually wants to accomplish he recognized his own emotion

1:01:15

and people get very extreme when they’re emotional it’s understandable but when they are in that emotion they start to perceive other people who are actually saying what they’ve always said as somehow a attacking them or saying something that’s wrong and then usually you know the scales fall from their eyes the more distance there is from the actual event that took place and they’re able to hear things more rationally again that is all that I was saying with Tucker is I haven’t really moved any of

1:01:41

my stances whatsoever and that is why people are bothered whether you think that’s understandable or not is not going to change things I do want to get to this though because like I said we’re not going to agree on Rabbi schmi we’re not going to agree on his daughter we’re I’m not going to agree on your interpretation that my defense of myself is somehow anti-Semitism I intend to keep defending myself against somebody that I uh you know view to be absolutely despicable and actually what I will say

1:02:05

is that in terms of anti-Semitism I think a lot of it uh stems from what I what I would say is individuals feeling that amidst their own communities let’s remove let’s remove dues from this if a black person does something wrong I immediately call it out on my show I’ve said tons of things about black people acting like thugs I’ve stood up against black people they were using racism um basically just to absolve themselves from any critique but when it comes to the Jewish Community it’s very odd I think to watch

1:02:36

the indefensible get defended right the indefensible get defended like what Rabbi schi what rabbi schy did over the last two years I would expect people to come out and say it’s obviously wrong instead what we have is you coming out and saying well what canace is saying in defense of herself is actually what’s wrong rather than saying maybe both maybe saying what rab did was absolutely wrong but you you can’t take you can’t take the time to look into what he said for the last two years is what you’re

1:03:01

saying but you wrote this article in defense of him C Candace this is not about Shi and it was not in defense of him and I said to you earlier in this talk if he was saying inappropriate things he should be reprimanded for that that’s not what you said here in your article though this is about you and your pattern of behavior and your pattern of words and and I I have no issue and maybe you should do a little bit more reading of what I’ve written you wrote like any father schie defends his children when attacks wait I have

1:03:37

taken on un the the unethical behavior of Jewish leaders and Jewish organizations publicly to the detriment of my own life I’ve taken on Jonathan greenl for five years of what he’s done to the ADL I got the receipts to prove it you can read articles okay I’ve exposed him for what he’s done that was not right so when you make a comment like when someone does something wrong in the Jewish Community the Jewish Community doesn’t say anything I’m you and I are talking and I have a history of both calling out

1:04:12

people who are unethical within my own tradition and standing up for other groups that are not in my tradition that are being persecuted okay last year about wait wait about a year you’re and you didn’t do the research about that because about a year year and a half ago Catholics were being so disrespected I’m not Catholic by the LA judgers wanting to um honor the sisters of Perpetual Indulgence a trans group that dresses up like nuns and to honoring Dodger Stadium I not only wrote articles my articles

1:04:45

helped promote General Flynn to help promote Catholics for Catholics to do a demonstration at Dodger Stadium that I spoke at but that had nothing to do with Jewish people wait and I’ve called out Jewish people why don’t you Google my name in Jonathan greenl great I’m I’m glad I think that all all together everybody glad I’m glad what I’m just trying to I am trying to communicate to you that when people can go and as they have seen as I showed on my show all of the attacks on Rabbi schi which were

1:05:15

were available to you when you wrote this article and then they see you write something please let me finish my statement please they they see you write something Rabbi schie is an author of 31 books was a rabbi at Oxford for 11 years has a 30-year career of writing speaking preaching and guiding people in Jewish beliefs he has also been an activist in many causes and most importantly is a most importantly is a loving father of nine children and like any father he defends his children when attacked and is proud of their accomplishments hold

1:05:42

hold because I never attacked them first they’ve been attacking me consistently for two years and then you go on hold on hold on Candace you’re smarter than this I know but just let me finish let me finish then you go on and you talk about me the people might say this might be a racist Troke but here we go she dropped out of college because of a quote unquote issue with a student loan never even voted in elections until she had successfully created her unique brand a pretty black woman who’s politically

1:06:07

conservative when anyone confronts her about her lack of knowledge or wisdom she retreats to the position of counterattacking them for not appreciating a strong black woman who goes against every goes against The Stereotype when you read something like that and you see that comparison in how you are presenting people despite the fact that factually speaking Rabbi Shi and his daughter were the ones attacking me for two years straight I didn’t even know who they were when you talk about when you speak about me like that and

1:06:32

make it seem like I’m I’m sorry let me use your words here lack of knowledge or lack of wisdom how do you think the public perceives that when I’m the one that’s being I’m not concerned about how the public perceives it or not what I’m concerned about is if you believe and I cannot judge this because I’m not con I’m not aware of two years I don’t follow you okay just my life is too busy I got a congregation and and teenagers and also sorts of things if you believe that shi and his his daughter are doing

1:07:03

things that are attacking you on a personal level not attacking your persona not attacking what you do am I calling you as anti-semite is attacking you for how you act not attacking you as a human being please understand there is a difference of who we are and how we are she dropped out of college is attacking you if he is attack attacking you on any personal way that doesn’t mean it’s okay for you to attack him you know better than that you teach your children all that better than that no I I actually F like

1:07:37

everything I’m saying about I’m like if this is Holy like you know selling butt plugs with your daughter I I don’t know maybe you’re right I think it’s gross I think it’s disgusting and I do not it’s not the definition of holy in the Christian faith is what I would say it’s weird to me it’s very and this could be a difference in our religions but by the way your Rel does not Trump My Religion so I think that you should respect the fact when I say something as Unholy I am

1:08:00

referring to my religion every his relationship between him and his daughter is very creepy to me the sex podcast is very creepy to me the idea of sitting down and talking to your father about you know topics of sex in any regard is creepy to me him promoting butt plugs that are sold by his daughter is creepy to me I have a right to say that I find this to be utterly Unholy and that any faith leader at least in the Christian Community would agree that all of this is giving us very weird Vibes between the father and daughter

1:08:29

relationship I can say that all I want and I and I I do think that part of it and this is where we get to the topic of where people perceive this and they say is this a form of Jew Supremacy to say suspend your Christianity because my my Judaism matters more is the feeling that I get when you say you don’t get to say it’s an Unholy Rabbi Rabbi pornography pornography is is Unholy in my view you might have disagree with that it is Unholy to to to Christians the topic of pornography pedaling pornography selling

1:08:58

butt plugs you know the commercialization of pornography is Unholy and I’m going to continue to call him Unholy because that is what I deem him to be and I say that as a Christian okay so Candace if you made the comment right and you said that this man Rabbi or not Rabbi because it doesn’t matter if he’s a rabbi or not from what you’re telling me you’re understanding of your theology is okay um your understanding of your Christian theology I don’t know what denomination or SE part of is that what he’s doing is

1:09:31

Unholy then for you to say that from my Christian Perspective what this man is doing is Unholy I absolutely respect for you to say my position as a mother as a woman I find what this is what is going on here is creepy I don’t find that anti-semetic in the slightest either of those comments I I really don’t But but so please hear that because I don’t if You’ said this guy is creepy okay that’s not anti-semitic that’s your opinion on on the relationship of what he’s doing if you said the what his what

1:10:08

his um what this business that he and his his daughter I don’t know if it’s he and his daughter or just his daughter I don’t know if they’re combined in the business I have no idea but that this business is um from my Christian perspective is very Unholy that’s not anti-Semitic it’s not I mean here if you had said that I wouldn’t be talking about have to say as a Christian I am a Christian and it’s Unholy okay no you said you determine you who are not a theologian who who does not know Jewish

1:10:42

theology at all and I’m pretty sure doesn’t know what gamar or mishta are or how they’re used or the dialogues about marital intimacy you decided he’s Unholy yeah now if you said from my Christian Perspective he’s an Unholy man or he’s doing Unholy things God bless you and I’m fine with it but you didn’t you said it’s an Unholy Rabbi and his had dog and and again what I was really hoping to hear which I haven’t heard from you once in this very long talk is the realization of saying you know what

1:11:16

Rabbi I hadn’t thought about that you’re right I understand how that would be considered anti-semitic and that wasn’t my intention I have a problem with this man I have a problem with I’ve seen zero so far other than the fact that you say you’re willing to watch a documentary film by the IDF I’ve seen zero self-responsibility of saying you know what I didn’t mean that I didn’t say that or excuse me I didn’t mean that that’s not my intention and I’m sorry well I just want to I heard

1:11:45

that from you yeah once what I what I made clear to that shows me a very that’s really disappointing to well I don’t want you to be disappointed and as I always say to people I no I’m serious I don’t want you to be disappointed I understand that human beings have a lot of feelings right everybody has you can say I watch this and this is how I felt about it for me the reality of what I have actually said and the way that it is being interpreted I don’t think is fair like I that’s why I wanted to go

1:12:12

through the clips of what you said what you wrote that I said versus what I actually said I I when I did condemn hamash you’re saying I didn’t condemn Hamas you’re saying I attacked Ben Shapiro you don’t have the clip available I I I I feel that actually Happening Here is you want me to apologize for things that I never said on the basis of how you felt and that’s not I have a suggestion okay I have a suggestion okay you and I are both politically conservative right I mean I am and I know you are and I would hope

1:12:43

that we’re all faced in the same direct way I’d like to ask you some specific questions about the things in that article and and you just tell me okay and and so if I misinterpreted something if I misread something I Mard something you feel I misunderstood something you know communication happens especially when we’re doing writing miscommunication happens so I’m going to ask you simple questions that that would define anti-Semitism with the vast majority of rabbis Jews and theologians do you believe October 7th

1:13:17

was uniquely evil and on a whole other level that anything going on especially anything going on in God or anything else right now from the moral ethical your point of view as a Christian I am asking you point blank do you feel that October 7th what happened is uniquely at a whole little level and depth of evil yes or no I believe that what happened on October 7th is evil we’ve seen you believe it is a whole other level than anything else especially what is going on in gopel I think that there have been things that have happened historically

1:13:54

like the Holocaust like what the buik did to Christians the Christian Holocaust that I not answering trying to answer your question I guess I would like you to explain to me in your own context Holocaust versus what happened on October 7th why is October 7th uniquely evil compared to the Holocaust maybe you can educate in October 7th there was you don’t know your history about the Holocaust then in October the Holocaust was a machine that was made and cost Germany the war so You’ say October 7 October 7th was a specific intention

1:14:29

remember that on the Holocaust the first attacks are are war attacks it is all about a war effort and world domination October 7th is about to torture and do such horrific things to civilians to the weakly innocent the so I’m asking you a very simple question I I I’m you asked it I’m I’m ready to answer it I think it was evil and you know if you if you feel it’s uniquely bombed a million Iraqi civilians you’re talking about just like if you’re weighing against civilian cost and again I think

1:15:07

what how you said about when you read the you know you watch The Passion of the Christ and you have you know your eyes when you watch and I have my Christian eyes very difficult for me to say when the greatest Holocaust that ever happened was against Christians and what the bulvik did to us drowning Us in barges I cannot like I I cannot discount the things that have happened to Christians we are actually the most persecuted religion in the world and it’s never described as uniquely evil and so what happened October 7th is evil

1:15:32

full stop what has happened in the past to Christians what is happening currently to Christians in Armenia it’s evil so I I I you’re feeling that it’s Unique is probably you know is is I want to recognize it but I don’t I don’t want to sit here and pretend I make a simpler question minimize what what I’ve been through I mean unique evils slavery I’m a black woman I mean there’s tons of things that have happened and I don’t want I don’t want to pretend that I think that what when it happens to Jews

1:15:58

it’s somehow more evil or more unique than it happens to other groups all around the world I’m ask you I’m going to ask you a specific simpler question do you believe there is a qualitative difference between what was done on October 7th and the horrible tragedies that are going on in Gaza with children being used to suon Shields and dying with with and being killed with all of that there are tragedies going on in Gaza we both agree on do you believe that there is a a radical difference between what happened October 7th and

1:16:30

what is going on there or do you believe that there is really not a moral and huge qualitative difference it’s one of how it’s happening is different how it’s happening is different there’s no question different it’s evil just the same way children innocent children dying if the consequence of children is dying of course it is it is an evil thing for innocent children to be dying I Me Do You Believe okay so so I want to make sure hearing okay I don’t want to misinterpret you I’m asking for specific

1:16:59

answers always an evil and I again say this as a Christian it is always an evil when innocent children are killed always an evil so do you believe that October 7th is more evil than what’s happening when the innocent children I didn’t pardon I’m asking you what I’m asking you the simple question do you believe there’s a greater depth of evil in what happened October 7th than any of the tragedies that are happening in actually let me let me let me actually toss this back to you because this is this is a

1:17:25

great no no no no no no no no this is a great question I’m glad you asked this but I want to toss this to you because one of the things that was also radically misinterpreted actually I was talking about Brian mass in his language when he said uh that you know there’s no such thing as an innocent Palestinian life I thought that was horrifically genocidal to say that and that has been a huge conflict of whether or not what’s happening is genocidal over not genocidal and something that I don’t think that we have a clear definition on

1:17:54

uh is genocide and this is obviously the word was created post Holocaust and so I would just like to get from you because that we’re running because we are running out of time I I so so I’m not I’m I’m just I’m not trying to d i don’t use the word you don’t use the word genocide nope so you wouldn’t describe the Holocaust as a genocide um I would describe it in other ways it’s just not the language I use so for me to say that this is a definition would be arrogant and inappropriate

1:18:21

because what percentage of a certain group of people have to that would a genocide because think that’s part of back listen if we can just say amount of people percentage of people dying of the same cand ethnic group Candace you don’t I’m telling you point to blank you’re asking me to define a term that I don’t go around utilizing okay so I so I don’t you’re T you’re saying Define this and what I’m saying is I I don’t use that term I am asking you a simple question which you

1:18:56

have avoided a yes or no on I haven’t avoided a yes or no on anything I’ve been answering you this entire time I am just saying that if the consequence for me I I cannot like what happened on October 7th to me was so horrific and was so evil and it partially the reason why I believed it was so horrific and so evil was there was no military Target you were just targeting civilians and civilians are innocent right and so for you to then tell me is it more or less evil when now innocent civilians what what is the number at can you tell

1:19:28

me what the number is at of of Palestinian children that I can’t becauseas stories AR I’m asking you I’m not asking himas I’m asking you I’m asking I’m ask I’m gonna try make when you’re asking me to compare compare you’re actually asking me to do is to compare is is to State whether or not I believe please let me finish I feel that that question okay is you trying to stat question I believe I believe that what happened in October 7 is a uniquely dark form of evil on a whole other level on a whole other level

1:20:05

in every way shape or form of evil than anything that is happening in God do you agree with my statement or disagree I don’t need explanations do you agree with me or disagree I’m I’m I I have said to you a thousand times I feel like what you are asking me to do right now I’m I’m looking at the cost of life this is how I analyze things you can’t agree you’re not going to agree with I am uncomfortable with the amount of innocent life that is lost right now in Goda you’re not I am not let’s move on

1:20:35

let’s move on because there’s other stuff because there’s another piece in that part of it feels like you want me to weigh like is Jewish is Jewish innocent life worth more than Palestinian innocent life and I’m not comfortable with that you already made that you made that clear that that you don’t do it the same or You’ be able to say that would happen I you innocent life as innocent life like I’m I’m saying I just innocent life lost cand you’ve made it clear you weren’t able to

1:20:57

answer yes to that question fine let’s move on to something else that is but I want to again St yourself clear I don’t need more no you made clear you’re good I’m good please stop because it’s important for listeners to understand when you ask a question like that okay different than you’re saying do you think it is Justified for people to defend themselves you are basically asking me a question is more Israeli life is that more of an evil when when it’s lost than when more Israeli than

1:21:24

more innocent life and I am not comfortable with that question chandice that’s not what I said I no I made a statement of my beliefs and only asked you if you could agree or disagree you couldn’t take a stand I’d like to move to something else in that article that we have not discussed because I am conscious of time which is you make a comment in in again and I think you do want to discuss this as well I’m going to guess and I want to be conscious of your time because I think it’s important

1:21:54

you said we stand on October 7th that’s fine um it’s you stand where you stand uh you make a comment in your comments back toot about and again you make an equivalency where you talk about the Hollywood Jewish gangs that Kanye West believes that and that shouldn’t we be able to talk about them and you make the analogy with Crips and blood Bloods MH and I make the comment how anti-semitic this is because it’s a Trope that goes back almost 100 years there was a and how how Jews control Hollywood in the 20s the

1:22:39

Hollywood entertainment industry was started by majority of them people studos were Jews they couldn’t get jobs in anything any other business when they came to this country many of them were sons of rabbis and there’s a truth and there’s a great book called Empire of their own how the entertainment industry was started by Jews and how they did control Hollywood in the early days they employed other Jews who were unemployable that stops by the 60s and 70s and it’s totally gone by the 80s and 90s okay and and it and it is gone it is

1:23:09

a Trope that people saying understand that when go back remember we talked about the blood the blood liel blood liel has become a term that understood by academics anthropologists socialist not political but social social Anthropologist the blood light is when you blaming Jews for the problems of people that other people that you’re radically blaming them for because of the anti-Semitism as a form of anti-Semitism for many decades you were told oh the Jews control Hollywood this secret cabal and they control

1:23:44

Hollywood you perpetuated that again I understand you defending against smly B I understand that you’ve explained yourself about Rabbi but you made the specific comments about this Jewish group I think you call them gangs or thugs as opposed to saying that there are people who are who run Hollywood who are bad people do bad things I’m not going to question whether there are or are not but you identify the noun to their adjectively acting badly as a Jew when the reality is that Jews don’t control Hood there may be

1:24:26

many Executives who are Jews but that doesn’t mean that they are anything other than Jew and name only they go to Temple tce a year you and I both know Christians like that right yes uh so I just know like that right I wouldn’t chisti I would not judge Christians based on the idea that some of those guys who don’t really practice Christianity as my friends who are pastors Define it I’m not Christian that people call themselves Christians but don’t act in a Christian way I would never use the noun of

1:24:56

Christians whether these people their mothers were Jewish or not you perpetuated an anti-semitic Trope that is almost a century old and as opposed to saying there are some bad guys who are doing bad things and when they’re called out about it they hide behind a call of anti-Semitism that’s a very different kind of statement that you could have said as opposed to talking about the Hollywood Jews the Jews controlling Hollywood that whole thing well I never said I never said the Jews control Hollywood but Jewish people have said that um we

1:25:32

can share an article off a link here La that was published in the LA Times a couple of years ago where a Jewish man wrote let’s face it we do run Hollywood that was totally fine a couple of years ago maybe he’s anti-emetic though fine it’s not ever been fine okay I’m just saying I’m just saying like this was something this has been said and it’s actually funny because I was reading uh a very old article yesterday uh forgetting the guy’s name I’m blinking on him but he’s he was the

1:25:57

founder of screw magazine he’s a Jewish guy Al Al something I’m blanking on his name anyways he gave a very long interview about how you know the Jews hire the Jews when they get into Hollywood and like I said this was said not a hundred years ago so this was something that many many jewi people have that many Jewish people have said but sure I guess you’re saying now it’s a Trope but I just want to be clear that many Jewish people have said this in many interviews within the last 50 years okay as I said there’s I do want to

1:26:23

press pause on that ask you a question is it possible for Jewish people to form a gang full stop to find gang to to form a gang I I mean let me phrase that because I don’t need to ask I don’t even need to ask that question the answer is of course there is because there were Jewish gangs in New York of course common sense that Jewish people can form a gang black people can form a gang gangs exist will always exist Jewish gangs have existed and will always exist like you know worldwide gangs happen how absurd it is

1:26:52

to say that if you think that they there is a gang that is operating to even suggest that there might be a person in the that is automatically a Trope that would mean it was it would be impossible for us to to illustrate as soon as you say it’s a Trope and magically you can’t talk about it I gave examples of of multiple people in Hollywood okay we’re talking about from Dave Chappelle to Kanye West to Cat Williams to other artists that are Christian that have said that there is some sort of a gang full stop that is

1:27:22

operating in Hollywood I then gave example of a list of exact names that Michael Jackson said were operating as a gang rabie schie was Rabbi schmi was among that list of people so to say that we can’t even Explore that possibility that Rabbi schmi you know and that that this list that somebody is giving or something that artists are saying might be true is somehow anti-semitic I’m not saying all black people or I mean I’m sorry all Jewish people are gang members I am saying that it is of course possible that a gang is operating

1:27:56

anywhere in the world that should just be allowed to be said without being accused of creating a TR Candace C Candace again we’re at the same place of that we start at of when I said to you I don’t get to tell a black man if there’s if he’s feeling racist I don’t get to tell a woman if you’re experiencing misog I keep telling you that things you have said repeatedly are hurtful to a huge number of Jews and are considered anti-semitic and instead of hearing any wow I didn’t realize that all I have heard for the

1:28:37

lengthy time we’ve been on we’ve been on together which I again things very gracious and kind of you but all I have heard from you not one sense of responsibility not one you know I’ve said to you that if something is true or not true I don’t have issues saying I’m wrong I don’t have apologize but I haven’t heard from you one sense of responsibility that you have just use this as the example you have tapped into a thousand year old blood Lial Trope a century old Trope specifically about Hollywood and and you

1:29:15

keep going off well can’t this be intellectually right can’t can’t you do this can’t you’ve heard a bunch of Jews did you want to absolutely absolutely not okay you did you have you continue to yes I understand and what I will say you don’t want to then then then realize that what you’re saying is it Taps into centuries old hate realiz going to tell you that when I am speaking I get what you are saying I get what you are saying but I’m going to tell you what this is reminisent to

1:29:49

me of this is reminition sorry listen please just let me finish my statement this this is reminition to me of when I got interested about BLM and I thought that there was corruption in BLM and black people all over America were crying insisting on the BLM narrative and I thought that there was corruption and that this was operating like a gang and they were taking money and there was money laundering there were tons of people Al sharpened among them and it sounds a little you know you can’t possibly say this canace you can’t it

1:30:14

leans into this it leans into that but my instincts are my instincts and I have a right to pursue those instincts and to the extent that any black person was harmed in the making of my documentary and then I ended up being proven right that there was corruption that was happening I’m very sorry that they felt that way so I will say to the extent that any person who is finding my interest in what is happening in Hollywood feels that is leaning into some Trope and that I shouldn’t you know keep going I am sorry that you feel that

1:30:38

way but I am also going to follow sorry that is just disingenuous that’s not but I’m telling you that I understand that people have feelings but I would like to follow and pursue the facts and the facts are that many people in Hollywood are saying that there is some sort of a gang that is operating I am not blaming Jewish people an okay well I’m not blaming Jewish people for that at all so I just want to be very clear that is an anti-semitic Trope that has led to all sorts of of of of horrible things what let

1:31:10

whatw I’m telling you as someone who knows this that and by the way again maybe you should read what I was writing about BLM because you and I were on the same page okay and did you get also get called racist and people calling you all sorts of names that maybe weren’t true because you thought BLM was just actually corrupt I actually took them on about the fact that all lives matter my house was band like four times and that was considered racist at that time so would you have been right to revoke that and

1:31:38

apologize to black people because they said that that was racist or so no one but here’s the thing no one sat there and said you’re a racist about it they said racist they said all sorts of things and I got death threats and as I say my house was vandalized four times m i called for a strike I called for a strike of MLB on PJ media of Major League Baseball the day that they decided to put BLM on Major League Bas and if someone said to me you know what you’re playing into a stereotype that goes back centuries old of fill in the

1:32:11

blank I would have Rewritten something I would have said I’m sorry okay I am telling you with absolute Authority that what you are saying about hwood is anti-Semitic there’s not a this is what theologians this this is constant and it is an expression of a blood liel going back to 11:44 you’re saying well I don’t mean to hurt someone okay if I apologize to you my apology would be gee I apologize I’m sorry for what I did I’m sorry not I’m sorry for how you feel well no I’m genuinely am sorry if you interpreted my

1:32:58

susp I no I genuinely am sorry if you interpreted that like my suspicion about a gang operating Hollywood to be some sort of a condemnation of all Jews it’s actually the exact opposite which is why specifically named I’m telling you that that you that are you going to let me let me speak what that that is the reason why I specifically named Rabbi schmi who was listed at by Michael Jackson who has been listed multiple times and who I believe operates like a gang member by his threats that he’s been saying against me that he’s going

1:33:26

to bankrupt me I’m not going to pretend that I don’t think that Rabbi schmi operates like a thug and I’m going to withhold my me stating that clearly because you’re saying well that leans into an trob him being Jewish doesn’t mean anything to me him AC acting like a thug and making threats against my life and livelihood is something wait I say RAB I did say Rabbi schi time out because you just said something okay that that is really beautiful if you walked if you walked that talk you just

1:33:59

said him being Jewish him being a rabbi doesn’t have anything to do with him being a thug I said that on my episode too about the bugs and the Crips wa wait wait wait wait wait I I don’t watch your episodes can is forgive well how can you write these articles and then say I’m sorry I didn’t watch it that’s that is that is that completely ridiculous so you get to write articles and and liable me but then say I didn’t watch the episode you wrote a whole section on the episode I watched the clip that you do

1:34:25

but that’s ridiculous you literally said you wrote an entire paragraph saying that I attacked him as a thug a monster all of this stuff and you bring up the Bloods and the Crips which is from that episode but fail to mention that I said they’re using I watch your blood Crips wait wait Candace I watched your blood CPS part and I read your comments on Twitter about calling the specifically in that episode of Bloods and Crips said that being Jewish is being used as seals has nothing to do with the fact that

1:34:51

they’re Jewish whatsoever you kept saying but you kept call I’m a rabbi and the simple reality is if you really believe okay that is doing something wrong he’s operating a thug which I hear you believe if you believe that he is acting in whatever way okay calling him out on that God bless you but when you take it to the place of putting Unholy Rabbi because that’s your definition when you take it to the place of him being a if he’s a jerk to you he’s a jerk to you it doesn’t matter if he’s a rabbi a priest

1:35:31

Jewish or whatever right so why bring up the rabbi and Jewish part well first off that’s he goes by Rabbi schmi so that’s just isn’t wa wait wait but wait I’m not but why bring up if if if someone’s being a jerk to you it doesn’t matter if they’re white black purple Jewish Catholic or anything else they’re being a jerk okay so all we ever need to do is call them out for being a jerk I didn’t say Rabbi Rabbi schmi is being a jerk to me because he’s Jewish I just called him Rabbi schi

1:36:01

because that’s what he goes by we are we are we are running out of time so I do I do want to give you just a full minute here to wrap up and to express to people how you feel about this issue because I think that’s really important look I I first of all I appreciate that you wanted to have a dialogue in any form what I extremely um I’m extremely sad I’m a little bit optimistic I am optimistic that maybe you and I can have a dialogue after you watch October 7th this film if you actually do see it and I will arrange

1:36:27

for it just have your I can do with scy your producer um and put them in the right contact to arrange it for and if you really watch it very interested in your reaction that’s I’m a little bit optimistic about that I am severely disappointed that we have spent however long and I do appreciate the time however long together I think over an hour probably right um and I do appreciate that um I am extremely disappointed that I did not once hear I like to we have a concept called chuba and Judaism chuba means that when you’ve

1:37:08

done something wrong you recognize you did it wrong you apologize for doing trying to fixing up to again makes for a healthy society and I am extremely extremely disappointed that not once in our conversation I hear you take responsibility for what you said you have taken responsibility I’m sorry if that made you feel that way I’m extremely disappointed that you have decided you have a clearer definition of anti-semitism than or saxs myself Ben Shapiro Etc going back Scholars academics whomever I’m extremely

1:37:45

disappointed that not once have I heard you say wow I messed up Rabbi I realize what you’re saying understand what I did wrong you know what I’m not going to phrase it that way again using shm’s the example you could just say you know what you’re right I don’t need to attack him and his daughter being rabbis I don’t they’re just bad people to me I don’t need to make a comment about a Hollywood gang of Jews they’re just bad guys who running Hollywood that may have whatever

1:38:15

relationships you’ve tapped into ancient tropes of an anti-semite tropes you have repeatedly repeatedly uh demonstrated a hate for Judaism and Jews now I’m hoping that will change but it takes a certain level of self-awareness to be willing to say I did wrong I’m sorry I’m going to do it different I pray and hope that you will I believe um I do trust when people say you have a nice heart niess and and I really would hope that ultimately um we can we’re both conservatives there are a lot of Jewish

1:38:56

conservatives a lot of black conservatives and we can all be on the same side pointing in the same direction as opposed to being split because of these kind of repeated comments it wasn’t just one repeated that you made and again I hope that that will change after you watch the documentary which you committed to me you will do so thank you for allowing me be here it’s your show so thank you very much for being here and like I said we are not going to edit you in any uh way we will definitely give you the ability to send

1:39:20

that video that you said of of me attacking Ben which I am very sure doesn’t exist thank you for reminding me that so I and then uh last I want to say is I have faith in one question Candace I actually this went very long and I have to get to a temple meeting and then I have lunch with a mutual friend of ours actually um uh so I don’t know when I can get that to does it matter if I don’t get it to till late this afternoon um that should be okay okay I I just I just I just want to be you know I want to be respectful

1:39:54

and I also I wanted to this has gone for both of us this has gone on much longer and I appreciate yeah no worries and I would have you back we should always want more speech not less of it nobody should ever be calling for the censorship of any person I uh believe in free speech even the speech I disagree with what I’ll say is what I always say I have faith in my audience they know who I am they know what I have said and what in what context I have said it I have a huge Jewish following and I am confident in their their belief in me

1:40:25

stems from the fact that they’ve been listening to the show and they know that I hold no hatred in my heart against Jews I just don’t believe any group is exceptional I don’t believe any group black white Spanish you watch my show you’re going to get offended and I am always going to call out wrongness when I see it and to the extent that we are using anti-Semitism as a tool to Bar people from critiquing certain individuals Allah RAB Shuli it is going to make an enemy of me but I will never be AG of the Jewish people so ladies and

1:40:55

gentlemen thank you so much for watching the show today I cannot wait to see your comments stick around because as usual tomorrow will be back with a brand new episode all right guys I’m just picking this up really quickly because as you heard throughout that discussion uh the rabbi said that after the conversation he would send to us evidence within the Tucker Carlson interview of my having attacked Ben chapiro for being pro- Israel he was unable to produce a part of that discussion with Tucker as evidence what he sent us instead was a

1:41:27

tweet that I wrote and just to contextualize this in response to a tweet that Ben had written obviously everyone’s aware of this public Feud Ben told me to quit and I responded with this I wrote in response you have been acting unprofessional and emotionally unhinged for weeks now and we have all had to sit back and allow it and have all tried to exercise exceeding understanding for your raw emotion but you cross a certain line when you come for scripture and read yourself into it I will not tolerate it I wrote that in

1:41:59

response to Ben writing Candace if you feel that taking money from a daily wire somehow comes between you and God by all means quit he was writing that in response to Biblical scripture I had tweeted blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the children of God blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness sake for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven blessed when men shall revile you and persecute you and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely for my sake no one can serve two masters either you will hate the one and

1:42:28

love the other or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other you cannot serve both God and money scripture from Matthews so again this is just in the interest of being an honest person and giving him an opportunity to produce his evidence that is what the rabbi sent us over was my tweet in response to Ben I would not interpret that as me being on the attack but that is how the rabbi read it so there you have [Music] it

Film Director Michael Moore Blatant Warning To Democrats: ‘Trump Is ‘Smarter Than Us … We Don’t Want To Say This Out Loud, But I’m Going To Say It’

Michael Moore has issued a blatant warning about the 2024 election, saying that Donald Trump is “smarter than” Democrats. During the latest episode of his Rumble podcast on Sunday, the director called a victory for Trump in 2024’s general election a “legitimate fear.” Michael Moore dialed up the urgency of a possible Joe Biden defeat ― and he did it by offering backhanded praise to Biden’s criminally indicted GOP adversary, Donald Trump.

“We don’t want to say this out loud, but I’m going to say it, and the reason why we need to be concerned is that Trump is smarter than us,” the Oscar-winning documentarian said on the latest episode of his “Rumble” podcast, which was released Sunday. “I’ll just let that sink in for a second. I know, I know, you’re calling the people to come to find me — the guys in the white uniforms with the big net — and take me away. Are you crazy? What do you mean he’s smarter than us?”

Michael Moore Rumble Podcast

Moore characterized the Trump as someone who has “been able to pull s*** off and get away with it” throughout his life, remarking, “It is an impressive track record.”

“I’m talking about the way throughout his entire life he’s been able to pull shit off and get away with it,” the “Bowling for Columbine” director said. “It is an amazing record. You know the record. I’m not going to run through the whole litany of it … You know the whole list, and he’s gotten away with it. You must marvel at how somebody that stupid is that smart when it comes to the performance of his evil and his ability to never have to pay for it.”

Moore, who famously predicted Trump’s victory in 2016, has also forecasted that Trump will be able to resolve his legal problems before the big day in November.

The filmmaker accused Trump of attempting to postpone his impending trials until after the November election. Trump faces a total of 91 criminal charges across four jurisdictions, with some related to the 2020 election.

Should Trump secure another term as president, a Supreme Court dominated by Republicans will most likely pardon his convictions.

“The only thing that can save us is ourselves,” he said. “We are going to have to mobilize.”

TRANSCRIPT: Bad News For Fani Willis | Nathan Wade Resigns | Trump Georgia Case

  1. Allegations Against Fani Willis: The transcript discusses allegations against Fani Willis, the Fulton County DA, regarding her romantic relationship with prosecutor Nathan Wade, which led to accusations of conflict of interest and potential financial benefits.
  2. Resignation of Nathan Wade: Nathan Wade’s resignation from the case is highlighted, prompting discussions about its impact on the legal proceedings and the decision-making within the DA’s office.
  3. Criticism of the Legal Situation: Various speakers criticize the legal situation, expressing concerns about selective prosecution, distractions from key facts, and the potential politicization of the case against Donald Trump.
  4. Calls for Accountability and Integrity: There are calls for accountability and integrity in the judicial system, emphasizing the need to uncover misconduct, ensure fairness, and uphold the Constitution, irrespective of political affiliations.
  5. Discussion on Legal Proceedings and Future Actions: The transcript also includes discussions on legal proceedings, potential appeals, the role of the judge, and the political implications of the case, indicating uncertainty about its outcome and future developments.

WATCH: FANI WILLIS CASE UPDATE

https://youtu.be/84xzKuIk19g?si=fZ1wEFqQVMjUy6nr

🚨 More Shocking 🚨 This is bad news for Fani Willis | Nathan Wade resigns | Trump Georgia case Nathan Wade, a special prosecutor working with the Fulton County District Attorney’s Office, resigned his post after a judge ruled Friday that District Attorney Fani Willis and her office may remain on the 2020 election case involving former President Donald Trump and his allies if Wade stepped aside. Wade’s resignation as special prosecutor came hours after Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee laid out two options that would allow for the continued prosecution of the racketeering case against Trump and his co-defendants stemming from an alleged scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election in Georgia.

TRANSCRIPT

00:00

um effectively as quickly as possible I should say I’m proud of the work that our team has accomplished in investigating indicting and litigating this case Seeking Justice for the people of Georgia goal is to have Donald Trump be wearing an or an orange jumpsuit they’re not going to reach that goal see the corruption I’ve seen the destruction I’ve seen to the judicial system it is deep they are coordinating and there is no question that her text with Mr Wade are just the beginning Trump Chief legal

00:28

spokeswoman Alina habba joins me now so Elena how does today impact This legal situation you’re having the legal situation I’m having shouldn’t exist no matter who’s sleeping with who let’s start there Jesse we all know that um I think that the Fanfare and the craziness that Miss Fanny Willis has brought to the table with Mr Wade has been quite honestly entertaining but distracting from the key fact of the case which is that President Trump did not do anything wrong this case was brought clearly by selective prosecution

01:05

persecution and only for election interference we see that now uh what’s more troubling today is that you know this judge we have has as you said punted he allowed and out but that doesn’t mean that the case should still stand we had three counts dismissed against President Trump three counts dismissed against another defendant that was a great start but let’s not deny what’s happened here Jesse this case was brought intentionally this year it’s old as can be just like Stormy Daniels just

01:34

like a lot of these cases that we’ve seen that are witch hunts to stop Trump from campaigning so while I appreciate all of it and it is quite entertaining I’ll give you that I I don’t disagree with you I think that we can’t be distracted from the fact that this case entirely should be thrown out Miss Willis is clearly uh compromised the taxpayers should be outraged in the state of Georgia and they should take action against her when we eventually see these text messages and I believe we will see them

02:05

and they show Fanny and her lover conniving uh maliciously Prosecuting Donald Trump doing it for fame doing it for Fortune doing it without any sort of judicial Integrity what does that tell you not just about the this case what does it tell you about all of the cases first let’s start Miss Willis went into a church a religious house if anybody has any morals or moral compass how dare you go into a religious house and cry racism that to me was the lowest point of all of this I have to be honest with you no matter what those texts say

02:43

and I’m sure we’ll see what they say and they will say what we think how does it relate to all these cases I hope it opens the door Jesse to us looking at all the Das all the AGS Communications between the White House the administration and collusion between all of them in bringing these cases the same year even though some of these cases are years and years and years old had no investigation or investigations for years and then waited until he was the candidate and obvious candidate uh for the Republican party and nominee so I

03:13

would like it to open the door I hope we get those texts but let’s look into everything I fear that we can’t do that until we have a different Administration in place but more importantly it’s time for the American people to see the corruption I’ve seen the destruction I’ve seen to the judicial system it is deep they coordinating and there is no question that her texts with Mr Wade are just the beginning AJC the Atlanta Journal Constitution now giving word what the judge has decided apparently

03:41

fonnie Willis can decide for her own if she wants to stay or leave the case and take Nathan Wade with her so we’re waiting for more information on this welcome to Friday Dana’s got the day off today I’m Bill hmer live here in New York City with my friend and colleague in tow here we go it’s going to be a ride it it certainly is we’re getting some very big news this morning so good morning everybody I’m Martha mcallum and this of course is America’s Newsroom um we understand as you just pointed out

04:08

bill that the that this decision is in judge McAfee said he would give himself a two-e deadline that landed on today so we have all come to know this judge a little bit over the course of the last couple of months his name is Scott McAfee he did decide uh today and he gave himself that twoe deadline as I mentioned and the decision that he has had to make is whether to disqualify The Fulton County DA Vonnie Willis in response to allegations that she was dating her lead prosecutor when she hired him and the accusation is that

04:41

that was part of a motivation for hiring him and that then the two took um some rather fancy vacations together and that they may have benefited financially from this business Arrangement which it was alleged she created for that purpose so Donald Trump’s team and his codefendants say this is all a disqualifying conflict of interests uh the case should be thrown out because of it all these allegations prompting heated testimony we watched it live you’re going to hear now from one of the first Witnesses on

05:11

behalf of Trump’s attorneys she’s a now a former friend and former colleague of fonnie Willis she was emphatic she said she remembered the timeline and she remembered the action when she asked her questions about Nathan Wade senior correspondent Jonathan Siri is reporting live from Atlanta on this part of this story and also what we’re going to hear next uh from fonnie Willis the the uh da in Atlanta yeah uh the the decision is not surprising because the judge really gave fonnie Willis a well probably an

05:46

unpleasant decision but an easy decision because uh if Nathan Wade were to stay on this case as special prosecutor then the da fonnie Willis would have been forced to resign uh from the case along with her entire staff they would have had to stand on the sidelines and so in order for this case to best move forward clearly the DA’s office made the calculation that uh losing this one special prosecutor Nathan Wade would be less damaging than disqualifying the entire office and then having the uh prosecuting attorney’s Council um

06:25

appoint a totally new slate of prosecutors to come in from outside side and handle this case so not a surprising development but a dramatic development Nathan Wade turning in his resignation from the case and the DA’s office accepting that resignation the key here is how to go forward because clearly weight is off but I think that this is such a huge body blow almost a fatal blow toon Willis I think the way forward is she has to voluntarily recuse herself I don’t know that she has it in her but I think she has to say I’m going to

07:03

appoint like a chief assistant who’s going to oversee this case she clearly has no credibility with this judge that could still happen Leslie nobody uh of whom I’ve asked this question thinks that anything in her character points in that direction but you never know I I would feel that the everybody would kind of say you know day late in a dollar short um if that were to happen and if she were to do do that she should have done this um you know prior because of you know the you know just the embarrassment alone not just the delays

07:37

not just a whole new prosecutorial team that has to be caught up to speed um if you will I do agree with Ari there that you know she she should have just appointed you know that I would have appointed you know the toughest person that you can find and the person that’s going to be great with this and and more apt to win but where one area that I disagree with Ari on is when Ari said it should be left up to the voters in November it is going to be left up to the voters voters in November whether Donald Trump will become president again

08:04

or not but it should never be up left up to the voters to decide whether somebody is guilty or not guilty in a criminal court of law that has to be done in the court system in our legal system and that has to be decided uh by a jury uh but going back I don’t think that she would do that but I would agree with Andrew there where you know if if your case is is dirtied if you will um by you um and anything that you’ve done or you’ve said you know better in the interest of democracy if you will um for

08:36

you to put the best team in place to win and if that means you stepping aside uh that’s that’s what you that’s what you do right well let me ask Leslie one more question before I go back to Ari um so the New York case which is the hush money case that’s delayed 30 days because the Department of Justice withheld according to the other side information that they didn’t bring out in Discovery so that that you got a problem there you’ve got the question of immunity on the January 6 case and and

09:00

the documents cases um so those are also running into issues and and waiting for the Supreme Court and you’ve got this Georgia case are you concerned Leslie that these efforts which have been so folsome uh might be coming apart so therefore have we heard the last of this in other words Mr Trump’s side and the other defendants can they come back can they appeal this decision say the kinds of things that you’re suggesting I hope so uh I think that when you refuse to disqualify somebody that should be an

09:31

issue that you can take up to the court right away cuz it’s a final judgment if she’s in the case she’s in the case if they can’t do it now they can certainly do it if they get convicted but if I were Trump’s lawyers I would make every effort to try to bring this case to an appell at court now it’s a good record because he basically finds her lying basically finds that he paid for all of their trips there’s documentation of that then the burden should shift back to her to prove that she paid him back

09:58

she can’t do that no proof no receipts no nothing um you’re still left with this Rico approach this racketeering approach which many people said just does not fit uh what does Alan d say I once had a client um his name was Guido and he was in prison and he called me he say what’s this Rico stuff it’s anti-italian why did they name it Irving why didn’t they name it Rico it’s designed for and it was it was designed to get the mafia it wasn’t designed to get political figures who have a

10:28

reasonable argument argument I disagree with fundamentally that they could have challenged the election through a different slate of electors that’s all legal stuff that’s not Rico stuff and so this case should be dismissed all of the cases against Trump should be dismissed the only one that has any plausible possibility of winning is the Florida case where he waved a document in front of a journalist and said this used to be classified I could have Declassified it but that’s not a Smoking Gun that’s a

10:57

smoking cigarette butt it’s a minor minor could be even smoking hearsay I mean no one knows for sure who said what to whom in those kind no there’s a tape of that but we don’t know whether he actually showed the document to anybody and whether the document actually contained classified material knowing trump it could have been a blank piece of paper he was puffing you think this Georgia case just going to wind up going up in Flames one way or the other I think it will go up in Flames I think it’s never been a strong case at all and

11:25

I think this will delay it probably beyond the election look the goal here was to rush convictions particularly in New York where a jury will convict a ham sandwich named Trump and to try to get a down in dirty conviction knowing they may be reversed on appeal after the election it’s the personification of election interference Professor alen dwoods the best of the best um this such your pleasure to see you on set pleasure to see you talk soon yeah I’m just looking um Jonathan standby at the letter from Nathan J Wade Esquire um he

11:58

writes to D a Willis the furtherance of the rule of law and democracy is and always has been the north star of our combined efforts in the prosecution of those who are alleged to have attempted to overthrow the results of George’s 2020 presidential election our team is dedicated to ensuring that a Fulton County jury in a Fulton County courtroom renders a true and just verdict in this case he goes on to say I’m proud of the work uh he said you know basically according to the judge’s decision um I

12:25

will resign immediately I offer my resignation um effectively as quickly as possible I should say I’m proud of the work that our team has accomplished in investigating indicting and litigating this case Seeking Justice for the people of Georgia and being part of the effort to ensure the rule of law um and he goes on to say that he’s sure that the team will be successful Ari uh your reaction to this news and do you understand it that their relationship began in 2019 and continued until the last time he spoke with

12:57

her yes as relate to having uh the 2022 relationship with district attorney Willis I’m going to say because my marriage was irretrievably broken I was free to have a relationship you’ve been intrusive into people’s personal lives you’re confused you think I’m on trial these people are on trial for trying to steal an election in 2020 I’m not on trial no matter how hard you try to put me on trial I don’t need anything from a man a man is not a plan a man is a companion well uh that is just a slice

13:31

of what we got from uh the da fonnie Willis in Georgia through the course of all of this we’ve got analysis from former Federal prosecutor Andrew chaski but first let’s go to Jonathan Siri who’s been covering this case all along in Atlanta big morning Jonathan yeah very big morning the story is unfolding as we speak the Atlanta Journal Constitution is reporting uh that uh Fulton County district attorney fonnie Willis has been ordered to eat either step aside or she has to cut prose cut ties with her special

14:06

prosecutor in the case Nathan Wade before uh the case can go to trial attorneys for former president Trump and several of his associates had asked the judge to disqualify the da from Prosecuting the case they argue Willis’s romantic relationship with uh prosecutor Wade creates a conflict of interest Willis and Wade have testified under oath the relationship began after Willis hired him but Willis also faces challenges outside the courtroom take a listen the biggest risks that fonnie Willis has are political nature she has

14:44

an election coming up which is now contested both in the primary and in the general election Martha it sickens me to hear him say this as a furtherance of democracy if this was about democracy the Democrats wouldn’t use the courts to indict Donald Trump they’d go to to November and let the American people decide that’s what a democracy would do but in America’s bluest counties fton County Georgia New York County which is Manhattan in New York City The Bluest of bluest counties were the bluest of

15:12

bluest prosecutors who will never lose a reelection unless it’s from the left indict Donald Trump you’ll never see these things brought in a purple County you never see them brought in a red County and it’s not because they have an adherence to democracy in the case of Georgia now with the Nathan Wade it’s because the judge ordered him to break up with his girlfriend it’s the judge ordered his girlfriend to break up with him from a legal point of view that’s why he’s stepping down not in

15:40

furtherance of democracy it’s because what he did was unsavory what the da did was unsavory and at its most UN fundamental level bringing charges against a political opponent is even more unsavory than any of the personal and saavyy behavior they engaged in that’s I I just he wrote that in that letter and it just rubs me the wrong way not about democracy you know uh Leslie there was an event that fonny Willis attended at the White House um she claimed that she had no interaction with the vice president who was speaking at

16:11

that event when she was at the White House but obviously there’s a lot of uh discussion from Republican quarters about the coordination that has potentially happened in this concerted effort to go after former president Trump and we haven’t heard from fonny Willis we have only heard from Nathan Wade at this point I want to play um control room if we can the Andrew Weissman who was part of the uh Russia investigation team um going after former president Trump he he wants fonny Willis to be gone he wants to go the whole way

16:44

and clean the decks of this team and he thinks that would be the best thing for the prosecution let’s watch this again from Andrew Weissman earlier today and as for the case itself judge McAfee struck down six counts against former president Trump and five of his associates saying the prosecution failed to provide enough details on how the defendants allegedly committed the crimes now if Willis remains on this case if she Remains the chief prosecutor she’ll have to decide whether she appeals that decision on the six counts

17:18

whether she seeks a new indictment or whether she goes ahead and prosecutes the case on the remaining 35 charges uh but again according to this reporting by the Atlanta Constitution uh da uh fonny Willis has a uh has has a major decision to make whether uh she uh removes herself from the case or whether she cuts ties with special prosecutor Nathan wade back to you guys okay a couple things here Jonathan do you know when the judge will be in court will that be today or not and based on the reporting I know it’s slim thus far do we know if

17:54

he gave her a deadline to give him an answer meaning the judge yeah we don’t know about a deadline uh this ruling was uh issued by the judge outside of the courtroom entered in the computer system it has just now appeared and uh we are now scouring it along with the rest of you uh trying to figure out the details all right well we’ll give you some some space to get that done Jonathan thank you with the breaking news no and let me tell you why and I know my second with you guys know I’m just honest I’m not like everybody think

18:29

oh Leslie I get on Twitter she has the Democratic talking points yeah this is what I have I I have no Democratic talking points um I have truth and this is my truth um I don’t think even if he is found guilty of all of these he is going to spend one second in jail and if the goal is uh you know and and it’s not going to keep him off the ballot it’s not going to keep people for voting for him it’s actually done quite the opposite and I many others predicted that and you know he could you know

18:55

again uh be president so if if what are you doing this for your democracy would have to do with politics right what are you doing this for if you’re doing it for for legal reasons it’s like impeachment it drives me crazy if you know you’re not going to remove the guy from office and I’m talking democrat or republican maybe it is a waste of taxpayer time and money so with this you you know you got to follow it through you you you know you go to go with the letter of the law but I have never been

19:18

you know a huge cheerleader of these simply because you know my question is a what is your goal and B are you even going to reach it and if the goal is to have Donald Trump be wearing an or an orange jumpsuit they’re not going to going to reach that goal in my humble opinion Trump laer Fanny V is compromised the expresses outrage over AED misconduct by Georgia prosecutor Fanny V accusing her of Malia targeting Donald Trump for prosecution they anticipate incriminating text messages between vas and her lover suggesting

19:50

cusion and a lack of Judiciary Integrity the condemns vs for invoking racism in a church deeming it Moro point they advocate for a thorough investigation into all district attorneys and attorneys gener implying widespread corruption and collusion with the White House they call for transparency urging the American people to see the corruption within the Judiciary System they suggest seizing government phones and sub poing Communications to uncover misconduct they advocate for accountability regardless of political

20:25

affiliation emphasizing the need to cleans the Judiciary system of political influence and upo the Constitution they stress the importance of taking action and holding individuals accountable for genuine crimes rather than political motives the concludes by urging a top down kup of the system

Charlie Kirk: ‘The Bloodbath Hoax Was Pushed By The Same Media’

The Bloodbath Hoax was pushed by the same media who brought you:

Russia Russia Russia!

Jussie Smollet “MAGA Country”

100% Safe and Effective

Hunter’s Laptop was Russian disinfo

COVID came from a wet market

2020 was the most secure US election

Very Fine People

The Border is secure

Boys can be girls

Jim Crow 2.0

Inflation is transitory

Modern Monetary Theory

Zelenskyy is Churchill

Defund the police for safer streets

Defenders of democracy work to remove Trump from democracy

America was founded in 1619

…and much more

The media are professional hoaxers. Your first impulse should be to assume they’re lying, deceiving, or gaslighting.

Charlie Kirk

VIDEO: Rapper Kodak Black Endorses Trump And 20-Year Presidency: ‘We Need Trump In Office Forever, Man. Just Like The Chinese and Russian’

Kodak Black Expresses Gratitude for Trump’s Pardon and Endorses 20-Year Presidency: “Trump the best thing for America”

Black, celebrated for his musical triumphs and philanthropic endeavors, remains deeply grateful to former President Donald Trump for extending him a pardon. In a recent statement, the 26-year-old artist, known as Bill K Kapri, openly expressed his appreciation for Donald Trump

“We need Donald Trump for like 20 years. Like how Russia does it. Four years isn’t enough time for a president,” Kodak Black emphasized, underlining his aspiration for an elongated presidential term, drawing parallels to governance structures in other nations.

Amidst Kodak Black’s legal tribulations, including a nearly four-year sentence for providing false information to purchase a firearm in 2019, his musical career soared. With three No. 1 hits, 24 top 10 hits, and a total of 44 songs to his name, Kodak Black solidified his status as a chart-topping artist.

Trump’s pardon offered a ray of hope during Kodak Black’s challenging times. Despite his incarceration, the rapper remained actively engaged in philanthropy, supporting various charitable causes, including educational initiatives and providing aid for COVID-19-affected businesses.

The White House commended Kodak Black’s altruistic endeavors, recognizing him as not only a prominent artist but also a leader within his community. White House officials highlighted his dedication to providing educational resources, aiding underprivileged communities, and making substantial financial contributions to charitable ventures.

“He has committed to supporting a variety of charitable efforts, such as providing educational resources to students and families of fallen law enforcement officers and the underprivileged,” stated White House officials, acknowledging Kodak Black’s impactful contributions.

In his unwavering endorsement of Trump’s presidency, Kodak Black reiterated his admiration for Trump’s leadership style and policies. “We need Trump in office forever, man. Just like how them Chinese and Russian and Korean motherf—ers have their president. Trump the best thing for America,” Kodak Black affirmed, reaffirming his steadfast support for Trump.

Following his release from prison, Kodak Black commemorated the event with a new song titled “Last Day In,” where he celebrated his freedom and acknowledged Trump’s influence. “Trump just freed me, but my favorite president is on the money,” Kodak Black rapped, signifying his enduring respect for Trump.

American Patriots Durable High Quality 3×5, 4×6, 5×8, 6x10ft Embroidered American Flag

Patriots Durable High Quality 3×5, 4×6, 5×8, 6x10ft Embroidered American Flag

They Tried So Hard To Make Him Look CORRUPT

“They tried so hard to make him look corrupt, but all they have done was show the world just how corrupt and dirty they are”

Anonymous

In the labyrinthine world of politics, where power optics often overshadow principles, accusations serve as currency. Allegations of corruption, dishonesty, and moral depravity are wielded with precision, aimed at tarnishing adversaries and bolstering one’s own standing. However, amidst this cacophony of mudslinging, there exists a profound irony – the accusers often end up revealing more about themselves than their intended targets. At the heart of this paradox lies a simple yet profound quote:

The essence of political warfare, where the lines between truth and deception blur and the pursuit of power often TRUMPS ethical considerations. Let us dissect this quote and unravel the layers of meaning it holds within the context of contemporary politics.

American Patriots Durable High Quality 3×5, 4×6, 5×8, 6x10ft Embroidered American Flag

Patriots Durable High Quality 3×5, 4×6, 5×8, 6x10ft Embroidered American Flag

The relentless determination, a concerted effort to tarnish the reputation of an individual or group. Behind the façade of political rhetoric lies a calculated campaign fueled by ambition, ideology, or personal vendettas. The intensity of the endeavor underscores the stakes involved – the quest for dominance in the political arena.

The accusation of corruption is a potent weapon in the arsenal of political warfare. It carries connotations of moral turpitude, abuse of power, and betrayal of public trust. Accusers seek to tarnish the integrity of their target, casting doubt on their suitability for office or influence. Yet, in leveling such accusations, they unwittingly expose their own moral ambiguity.

“But all they have done was show the world just how corrupt and dirty they are.” – here lies the crux of the paradox. The very act of accusing others of corruption illuminates the accusers’ own moral vulnerability. By projecting their shortcomings onto their adversaries, they lay bare their hypocrisy for all to see. The repetition of “corrupt” underscores the depth of the accusation, while the inclusion of “dirty” adds a layer of moral reprehensibility.

In the arena of politics, where perception is often reality, accusations can shape public opinion and influence electoral outcomes. However, the irony lies in the unintended consequences of such attacks. Instead of diminishing their targets, accusers inadvertently shine a spotlight on their own shortcomings. The more vehemently they accuse, the more their own moral bankruptcy is exposed.

In the pursuit of power, it is easy to succumb to the temptation of smear campaigns and character assassination. Yet, as history has shown time and again, such tactics ultimately erode trust in the political process and undermine the very foundations of our freedom.

Tucker On COVID Vaccine Deaths: ‘Why Is No One In The Public Health Establishment Paying Attention?’

Tucker Carlson interviewed Dr. Pierre Kory On the COVID Vaccine Deaths and said: “Of course, they were neither safe nor effective, and that was obvious right away. As

‘They’re Still Claiming The Covid Vax Is Safe And Effective. Yet Somehow Dr. Pierre Kory Treats Hundreds Of patients Who’ve Been Badly Injured By It. Why Is No One In The Public Health Establishment Paying Attention?’

Tucker Carlson

New RNC Chair Lara Trump Announces A Strategic Move To Bring In Scott Presler To Spearhead The Legal Ballot Harvesting Division

In a significant development within the Republican National Committee (RNC), the announcement made by Lara Trump, the newly appointed chair, has sparked considerable attention and discussion across various platforms. Lara Trump disclosed on Friday the RNC’s strategic collaboration with Scott Presler to spearhead the legal ballot harvesting division in preparation for the pivotal US 2024 Presidential Election scheduled for November.

The appointment of Scott Presler to lead the legal ballot harvesting division underscores the RNC’s commitment to ensuring electoral integrity and maximizing outreach efforts ahead of the upcoming presidential election. Presler, known for his fervent activism and dedication to conservative causes, brings a wealth of experience and expertise to this crucial role.

In an exclusive conversation with Benny Johnson, host of the Benny Johnson Show, Trump shared her high regard for Presler and articulated the RNC’s decision to enlist him for its new ballot harvesting division. Trump emphasized the importance of embracing innovative strategies, stating, “We also have to start thinking about things like legal ballot harvesting, something we’ve never embraced as a party.”

“We’re going to start doing it now,” continued Trump, underlining the party’s readiness to adopt new approaches to bolster its electoral efforts. Trump expressed her admiration for Presler’s accomplishments, highlighting his remarkable contributions to voter registration efforts across the country. “He has registered so many people in this country,” remarked Trump, emphasizing Presler’s effectiveness in mobilizing voters.

American Patriots Durable High Quality 3×5, 4×6, 5×8, 6x10ft Embroidered American Flag

Patriots Durable High Quality 3×5, 4×6, 5×8, 6x10ft Embroidered American Flag

“I think he’s fantastic. I want him on our legal ballot harvesting division,” Trump affirmed, signaling her unequivocal support for Presler’s appointment and the RNC’s commitment to leveraging his expertise in advancing their electoral objectives.

Scott Presler, in a post on social media, elaborated on his dedication to the cause, stating: “So, I’ve spent the last year traveling to each of these states & helping to recruit/train new volunteers. Our voter registration efforts & drives at places like gun shows, places of worship, gas stations, rodeos, farmers markets, country music concerts, & mud sales are making an impact.”

“To show how serious I am, I’m even looking to relocate my life to Pennsylvania — my heart has always had a soft spot for PA. I promise to spend the next 8 months doing everything within my power to elect President Trump & give him a Republican Congress he can work with. My heart is in this, my passion is unbridled and unmatched, & I’m proud to be an American. I look forward to working with each of you to save the country we love.”

The Right View with Lara Trump and ScottPresler

With Lara Trump at the helm of the RNC, the decision to enlist Scott Presler highlights a concerted effort to bolster the party’s organizational infrastructure and mobilization strategies. Presler’s track record of grassroots organizing and community engagement aligns closely with the RNC’s objectives to expand its reach and support base across the nation.

The collaboration between Lara Trump and Scott Presler signifies a proactive approach by the RNC to address potential challenges and opportunities surrounding ballot harvesting, a practice that has increasingly become a focal point in election discussions. By entrusting Presler with this responsibility, the RNC aims to mitigate risks associated with ballot harvesting while leveraging its potential to enhance voter turnout and participation within conservative demographics.

Scott Presler’s prominence within conservative circles and his demonstrated effectiveness in grassroots activism have made him a prominent figure in shaping the Republican Party’s electoral strategies. His appointment to lead the legal ballot harvesting division underscores the RNC’s commitment to adopting innovative tactics and leveraging grassroots efforts to secure electoral victories.

As news of Scott Presler’s appointment trends across various platforms, it has ignited conversations regarding the RNC’s strategic direction and the evolving landscape of electoral politics in the United States. With the US 2024 Presidential Election looming on the horizon, the collaboration between Lara Trump and Scott Presler signals a proactive and determined approach by the Republican Party to navigate the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead

Scott Presler’s Patriot’s Pledge: Mobilizing For Change In Response To Lara Trump’s Announcement Of RNC Collaboration For Legal Ballot Harvesting Division

Following Lara Trump’s announcement and subsequent trending on social media platform X, Scott Presler took to the same platform to address the attention he garnered, delivering a heartfelt tweet outlining his commitment to the Republican cause. In his impassioned message, Presler provided insight into his background, experiences, and unwavering dedication to political activism.

New RNC Chair Lara Trump

“Oh my gosh. Since I’m trending on X, please allow me to introduce myself: My name is Scott Presler,” he began, initiating a personal narrative that highlighted his journey and achievements. Presler emphasized his upbringing as an Eagle Scout and the son of a retired Navy Captain, underscoring his values of service and commitment instilled from an early age. Additionally, he proudly mentioned his academic accomplishments, graduating with honors from George Mason University.

Presler then delved into his diverse work experiences, ranging from humble beginnings as a dog walker and a grocery store employee to his pivotal roles in political campaigns. He recounted his entry into the political arena, starting with his involvement in Governor Greg Abbott’s campaign in Texas and later dedicating two years to support President Donald Trump’s candidacy, including efforts to defeat Hillary Clinton.

Scott Presler

The turning point in Presler’s activism came with President Trump’s attention to the city of Baltimore, Maryland. Motivated by the call to action, Presler mobilized 200 volunteers for a cleanup initiative, which gained national attention as they removed 12 tons of trash within 12 hours. This experience propelled him to embark on a mission of grassroots activism, organizing cleanups in disadvantaged communities across the country.

American Patriots Durable And High Quality 3×5, 4×6, 5×8, 6x10ft – 3D Stars- Sewn Stripes and Brass Grommets – USA Embroidered Flag

American Patriots Durable And High Quality 3×5, 4×6, 5×8, 6x10ft – 3D Stars- Sewn Stripes and Brass Grommets – USA Embroidered Flag

Driven by the desire to effect change at a broader level, Presler redirected his efforts towards voter registration, particularly in key swing states. He recounted successes in flipping counties and contributing to electoral victories, demonstrating his strategic approach to political engagement. Presler’s commitment culminated in the establishment of @EarlyVoteAction in January 2023, aimed at advancing Republican interests through comprehensive voting strategies.

Presler’s dedication to the cause was evident as he detailed his recent endeavors, including traveling to pivotal states, recruiting volunteers, and conducting voter registration drives in diverse settings. His decision to relocate to Pennsylvania underscored his determination to immerse himself fully in the upcoming electoral battle, emphasizing his unwavering resolve to support President Trump and secure a Republican-controlled Congress.

In closing, Presler reaffirmed his patriotism and determination, pledging to devote the next eight months to the mission of electing President Trump and shaping the political landscape of the nation. His impassioned message resonated with his followers, encapsulating the spirit of grassroots activism and the power of individual commitment in shaping the future of the country.